This thesis examines firms’ accountability of conflict. Specifically, I study how the recent geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine affect the demand and supply of SEC issuers’ relevant information. As Russia accumulates an unprecedented...
This thesis examines firms’ accountability of conflict. Specifically, I study how the recent geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine affect the demand and supply of SEC issuers’ relevant information. As Russia accumulates an unprecedented number of troops near the Ukrainian border on March 3, 2021, stakeholders start acquiring filings with information on firm-specific geopolitical risk exposures. Despite the increases in demand for information on firm-specific exposures, most firms supply novel information about their exposures only after Russia invades Ukraine on February 24, 2022. This implies that the geopolitical threat of war increases demand for information, but firms tend to delay the supply of information until the realization of war. Disclosure behavior varies across channels such as current reports, quarterly reports, conference calls, and management guidance. Cross-sectional analyses reveal that managers’ communications take into consideration potential shareholder exits when choosing their disclosure channel. Next, identifying a subsample of firms with revenues in Russia via the country’s tax register, I examine whether historical segment revenue disclosures on Russian exposure led to greater stakeholder responses when Russia invaded Ukraine. Controlling for firms’ proportions of revenues from Russia, I find that firms with the segment revenue disclosures suffer greater negative abnormal returns and analysts’ forecast inaccuracies at the onset of the war, despite incurring fewer impairments as the war unfolds. These findings are both important and timely and add to our understanding of the interplay between geopolitics, corporate disclosures, and capital market consequences in the United States.