This study evaluates the economic viability and comparative profitability of maize- based cropping patterns in Laewe Township, Myanmar. The cropping patterns analyzed include Maize–Maize, Maize-Rice-Cauliflower, and Maize-Rice-Chili, which represent...
This study evaluates the economic viability and comparative profitability of maize- based cropping patterns in Laewe Township, Myanmar. The cropping patterns analyzed include Maize–Maize, Maize-Rice-Cauliflower, and Maize-Rice-Chili, which represent common agricultural practices in the region. The main objective is to identify the most economically advantageous cropping system using cost-benefit analysis (CBA) methodologies, providing evidence-based insights to inform smallholder farmers and policymakers on optimizing livelihood sustainability and income generation. Data were collected through structured household surveys targeting farmers practicing the respective cropping patterns. The survey captured information on input utilization, labor allocation, crop yields, market prices, and total production costs over a complete agricultural cycle. Additionally, socioeconomic characteristics such as education level, gender, and age of household heads were recorded to contextualize economic outcomes. Descriptive statistics were applied to summarize household profiles, while inferential statistics, including Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), were used to assess the significance of differences in economic performance across the cropping patterns. The economic analysis employed several indicators: Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR), Payback Period (PBP), and Gross Margin Analysis (GMA). The findings indicate that all three cropping systems are economically feasible within the Laewe context. However, the maize-rice-chili system demonstrated superior economic performance, achieving the highest NPV and gross margin. This system’s profitability is primarily attributed to the high market value of chili as a cash crop, coupled with effective crop diversification, which contributes to greater income stability by spreading production risks. The maize-maize cropping pattern exhibited the highest BCR and the shortest payback period, indicating faster recovery of initial investments - an appealing option for farmers with limited resources seeking quick returns. Nonetheless, this pattern showed comparatively lower profitability, suggesting a trade-off between short-term gains and long-term income maximization. The maize-rice-cauliflower system delivered moderate economic returns, falling between the other two patterns in terms of profitability. The results of the ANOVA confirmed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in economic performance among the cropping systems, with the maize-rice-chili pattern emerging as the most advantageous. Based on these findings, the study recommends promoting the maize-rice-chili cropping system as a viable strategy for improving smallholder incomes in the Laewe region. To facilitate broader adoption, the study highlights the need for strengthened agricultural extension services focusing on integrated crop management and pest control, as well as enhanced market access through better infrastructure, price information, and value chain development. Access to affordable credit and subsidized agricultural inputs is also essential to reduce barriers for small-scale farmers. This research contributes to the limited empirical literature on the economic performance of maize-based cropping systems in Myanmar, providing actionable insights into how crop diversification can support rural livelihoods, enhance income resilience, and promote sustainable agricultural development. Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis, Cropping patterns, Maize, Myanmar