This study examines South Korea's multilateral security cooperation policy under five administrations in Northeast Asia, focusing on its evolution, achievements, and limitations amid the intensifying China-U.S. strategic rivalry. Continuity factors in...
This study examines South Korea's multilateral security cooperation policy under five administrations in Northeast Asia, focusing on its evolution, achievements, and limitations amid the intensifying China-U.S. strategic rivalry. Continuity factors include the U.S.-ROK alliance, prioritization of the North Korean nuclear issue, and engagement with major powers, which have provided a stable framework but constrained flexibility and innovation. Discontinuities reflect each administration's unique responses to shifting geopolitical contexts. The Kim Dae-Jung and Lee Myung-Bak administrations demonstrate how inter-Korean relations directly led to the interruption of multilateral cooperation. The Roh Moo-Hyun administration adopted a mediating role within regional frameworks, the Park Geun-Hye administration prioritized non-traditional security issues, and the Moon Jae-In administration expanded diplomatic outreach to ASEAN and Eurasian countries. This study further evaluates recent trilateral security cooperation among South Korea, the U.S., and Japan as mini-multilateralism, analyzing it through the lens of continuity and discontinuity. While this approach enhances strategic flexibility, it highlights limitations in inclusivity and institutionalization. The study concludes that overcoming these challenges with a more comprehensive and institutionalized strategy is vital for sustainable regional stability and security. Key words Multilateralism, Mini-multilateralism, Multilateral security cooperation, Northeast Asia