RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    혈류제한을 동반한 넙다리네갈래근 근력강화운동이 펜싱선수의 무릎 각속도, 근력, 균형에 미치는 영향 : 펜싱선수의 운동 능력 향상을 위한 혈류제한훈련의 효과 비교 = Effect of Quadriceps Strengthening Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction on Knee Angular Velocity, Strength, and Balance in Fencer

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17166996

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background: The quadriceps muscles are critical for generating propulsion during the Fente. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training, performed at low loads, has gained attention for its potential to enhance muscle strength and functional performance while minimizing injury risk. This study investigates the effects of low-load BFR training on lower limb kinematics during the Fente, quadriceps strength, and static balance in fencers.

    Methods: Sixteen collegiate sabre and epee fencers were randomly assigned to either a BFR group (30% 1RM leg extension with BFR) or a GLE group (70% 1RM general leg extension without BFR). A 6-week intervention replaced regular fencing training. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included lower limb kinematics during three defined phases of the fente, quadriceps strength, static balance

    Results: There was a significant difference in rear leg hip flexion angular velocity, knee flexion angle, and knee flexion angular velocity during Phase 1 in the BFR group (p<.05), but no significant differences were observed in the GLE group (p>.05). During Phase 2, there was a significant increase in rear leg knee flexion angles in the BFR group (p<.05). Between-group comparisons showed a significant difference in rear leg knee flexion angles (p<.05). In Phase 3, there was a significant increase in rear leg hip flexion angle, hip flexion angular velocity, knee flexion angle, and knee flexion angular velocity in the BFR group (p<.05). Between-group comparisons showed a significant difference in rear leg hip extension angular velocity (p<.05).

    For strength outcomes, there was a significant increase in rear leg isometric quadriceps strength in both the BFR and GLE groups (p<.05), but no significant differences were observed in front leg strength within or between groups (p>.05).

    For static balance assessments, no significant differences were found within either the BFR or GLE groups or between the groups (p > 0.05).

    Conclusion: This study demonstrates that BFR training effectively improves the rear leg angles and angular velocity during the Fente, even at low loads. It offers a safe and practical alternative to high-intensity training, reducing injury risks while enhancing athletic performance in fencers.
    번역하기

    Background: The quadriceps muscles are critical for generating propulsion during the Fente. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training, performed at low loads, has gained attention for its potential to enhance muscle strength and functional performance whi...

    Background: The quadriceps muscles are critical for generating propulsion during the Fente. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training, performed at low loads, has gained attention for its potential to enhance muscle strength and functional performance while minimizing injury risk. This study investigates the effects of low-load BFR training on lower limb kinematics during the Fente, quadriceps strength, and static balance in fencers.

    Methods: Sixteen collegiate sabre and epee fencers were randomly assigned to either a BFR group (30% 1RM leg extension with BFR) or a GLE group (70% 1RM general leg extension without BFR). A 6-week intervention replaced regular fencing training. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included lower limb kinematics during three defined phases of the fente, quadriceps strength, static balance

    Results: There was a significant difference in rear leg hip flexion angular velocity, knee flexion angle, and knee flexion angular velocity during Phase 1 in the BFR group (p<.05), but no significant differences were observed in the GLE group (p>.05). During Phase 2, there was a significant increase in rear leg knee flexion angles in the BFR group (p<.05). Between-group comparisons showed a significant difference in rear leg knee flexion angles (p<.05). In Phase 3, there was a significant increase in rear leg hip flexion angle, hip flexion angular velocity, knee flexion angle, and knee flexion angular velocity in the BFR group (p<.05). Between-group comparisons showed a significant difference in rear leg hip extension angular velocity (p<.05).

    For strength outcomes, there was a significant increase in rear leg isometric quadriceps strength in both the BFR and GLE groups (p<.05), but no significant differences were observed in front leg strength within or between groups (p>.05).

    For static balance assessments, no significant differences were found within either the BFR or GLE groups or between the groups (p > 0.05).

    Conclusion: This study demonstrates that BFR training effectively improves the rear leg angles and angular velocity during the Fente, even at low loads. It offers a safe and practical alternative to high-intensity training, reducing injury risks while enhancing athletic performance in fencers.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목 차 ⅲ
    • 그림목차 ⅳ
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • Ⅱ. 연구 방법 3
    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목 차 ⅲ
    • 그림목차 ⅳ
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • Ⅱ. 연구 방법 3
    • 1. 연구대상자 3
    • 2. 연구 설계 및 절차 4
    • 3. 중재 방법 6
    • 4. 평가도구 및 방법 10
    • 5. 분석 방법 18
    • Ⅲ. 연구 결과 19
    • 1. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성 19
    • 2. 팡트 구간 1에서 무릎 및 엉덩관절의 각도와 각속도 비교 21
    • 3. 팡트 구간 2에서 무릎 및 엉덩관절의 각도와 각속도 비교 24
    • 4. 팡트 구간 3에서 무릎 및 엉덩관절의 각도와 각속도 비교 27
    • 5. 넙다리네갈래근 근력 비교 30
    • 6. 정적 균형 비교 32
    • Ⅳ. 고 찰 34
    • Ⅴ. 결 론 38
    • 참 고 문 헌 39
    • 영 문 초 록 45
    • 감 사 의 글 47
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼