RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    반려견과 공생을 위한 아파트 공간 및 시설계획 연구 = A Study on Apartment Space and Facility Planning for Coexistence with Dogs

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17080839

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, it becomes an rising trend that the increase in the number of households with companion animal prompt the growth of global pet industry both quantitatively and qualitatively. Especially in terms of architecture, a number of places becomes to facilitate the needs of pets and pet owners, and home-building corporations in South Korea are developing merchandising solutions of houses for families with pets. Few recent architectural researches in pet-related domestic spaces were only focused on the perception from pet owners which generally ignores the spatial perception from families without pets. Especially in public housing environment, very few attempts have been made concerning making an harmonious environment for both groups.
    In this respect, this study attempted to resolve issues with certain behavioral patterns and spaces which displeased residents at a chance of pet encounter by field survey and interview and sought to present solutions to improve from both spatial and facility-related perspectives. Thus, this study concluded as the following.
    First of all, with the comparison among South-Korean examples of space design related to apartment space and facilities in the near future it could be easily estimated that shared spaces and facilities between pets and people are one of the most important architectural design elements.
    Secondly, from the field survey the most occupied spaces by pets and their owners were the garden walk or features in the boundary of apartment complexes , while according to the observation at the gardened boundaries pet owners were less likely to encounter other residents without pets at home. In the case of the underground parking lot, it was confirmed that it was difficult to manage some dogs, and it was confirmed that there was inconvenience caused by encounters between pet owners and non-pet owners at the entrance on the first floor of the main building. It was confirmed that dog-related facilities could be used in the idle space and lower part of the piloti within the complex, as well as community facilities and the rooftop of the main building on the lower floors.
    Thirdly, the survey results clearly reveal a common tendency that pet owners and other residents feel uncomfortable at most common spaces in the apartment complexes because of pets’ animal behavior. From the results of the survey over the 10 common spaces about installing pet-friendly facilities, regardless of groups most answered positive perceptions in most item. In addition, the installation plan of pet-friendly facilities at each space appears to move the both groups into the anticipation by relieving frightened residents and meeting expectation of pet owners’ demands.
    The purpose of this study is to provide basic data on space and facility planning to create apartment common spaces that are symbiotic with dogs. It is believed that the dog-related spaces and facilities presented in this study can contribute to the coexistence of pet owners and other residents and to resolve problems caused by pet animals to some extent. In addition, based on the analysis, the plan for installing dog-related facilities was presented as an architectural basis for future apartment complexes.
    However, limitations of the study include the lack of examples of dog-friendly apartment complexes, which prevented us from identifying the effectiveness of the proposed contents, and the survey sample was geographically partial, which hardened generalizing the results.
    In a follow-up study, further verification is needed through expert consultation and perception surveys in related fields, and a variety of sites should be investigated and further analyzed to further improve and explore the applicability of the recommendations.
    번역하기

    Recently, it becomes an rising trend that the increase in the number of households with companion animal prompt the growth of global pet industry both quantitatively and qualitatively. Especially in terms of architecture, a number of places becomes to...

    Recently, it becomes an rising trend that the increase in the number of households with companion animal prompt the growth of global pet industry both quantitatively and qualitatively. Especially in terms of architecture, a number of places becomes to facilitate the needs of pets and pet owners, and home-building corporations in South Korea are developing merchandising solutions of houses for families with pets. Few recent architectural researches in pet-related domestic spaces were only focused on the perception from pet owners which generally ignores the spatial perception from families without pets. Especially in public housing environment, very few attempts have been made concerning making an harmonious environment for both groups.
    In this respect, this study attempted to resolve issues with certain behavioral patterns and spaces which displeased residents at a chance of pet encounter by field survey and interview and sought to present solutions to improve from both spatial and facility-related perspectives. Thus, this study concluded as the following.
    First of all, with the comparison among South-Korean examples of space design related to apartment space and facilities in the near future it could be easily estimated that shared spaces and facilities between pets and people are one of the most important architectural design elements.
    Secondly, from the field survey the most occupied spaces by pets and their owners were the garden walk or features in the boundary of apartment complexes , while according to the observation at the gardened boundaries pet owners were less likely to encounter other residents without pets at home. In the case of the underground parking lot, it was confirmed that it was difficult to manage some dogs, and it was confirmed that there was inconvenience caused by encounters between pet owners and non-pet owners at the entrance on the first floor of the main building. It was confirmed that dog-related facilities could be used in the idle space and lower part of the piloti within the complex, as well as community facilities and the rooftop of the main building on the lower floors.
    Thirdly, the survey results clearly reveal a common tendency that pet owners and other residents feel uncomfortable at most common spaces in the apartment complexes because of pets’ animal behavior. From the results of the survey over the 10 common spaces about installing pet-friendly facilities, regardless of groups most answered positive perceptions in most item. In addition, the installation plan of pet-friendly facilities at each space appears to move the both groups into the anticipation by relieving frightened residents and meeting expectation of pet owners’ demands.
    The purpose of this study is to provide basic data on space and facility planning to create apartment common spaces that are symbiotic with dogs. It is believed that the dog-related spaces and facilities presented in this study can contribute to the coexistence of pet owners and other residents and to resolve problems caused by pet animals to some extent. In addition, based on the analysis, the plan for installing dog-related facilities was presented as an architectural basis for future apartment complexes.
    However, limitations of the study include the lack of examples of dog-friendly apartment complexes, which prevented us from identifying the effectiveness of the proposed contents, and the survey sample was geographically partial, which hardened generalizing the results.
    In a follow-up study, further verification is needed through expert consultation and perception surveys in related fields, and a variety of sites should be investigated and further analyzed to further improve and explore the applicability of the recommendations.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 4
    • II. 문헌 고찰 6
    • 1. 이론적 고찰 6
    • I. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 4
    • II. 문헌 고찰 6
    • 1. 이론적 고찰 6
    • 1) 반려동물의 개념 및 양육현황 6
    • 2) 반려견의 행동 특성 10
    • 3) 반려인과 비반려인의 행태적 특성 12
    • 4) 아파트의 개념 및 공간별 분류 16
    • 5) 반려견 친화적 주거환경 및 시설물 사례분석 18
    • 2. 선행연구 고찰 22
    • 1) 선행연구의 흐름과 최근 동향 22
    • 2) 주제별 선행연구 고찰 23
    • 3. 소결 25
    • III. 현장조사(관찰조사) 및 설문조사 26
    • 1. 조사의 틀 26
    • 2. 현장 조사 27
    • 1) 연구 대상지 개요 27
    • 2) 조사 방법 27
    • 3) 현장 조사 및 분석 28
    • 3. 본 설문을 위한 예비조사(인터뷰) 34
    • 4. 공간별 시설계획 분류 37
    • 5. 설문조사 40
    • IV. 조사 내용 분석 41
    • 1. 설문자료 분석 41
    • 1) 반려인과 비반려인의 생활특성 41
    • 2) 집단 간 인식 비교 46
    • 3) 반려견 시설물과 불편한 사항의 교차분석 67
    • 2. 심층 면담 조사(FGI: Focus Group Interview) 77
    • IV. 결론 78
    • 1. 연구 결과의 종합 78
    • 2. 연구 결과의 활용방안 81
    • 3. 법제도적 및 정책적 개선 방안 94
    • 4. 연구의 한계 및 후속 연구 방향 96
    • 참고문헌 97
    • 부록 100
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼