There exist major inequalities in regard to access to the available, accessible, affordable, safe, and acceptable water which in particular affects vulnerable groups such as women. Worldwide 2.4 billion people live in water-stressed countries. South S...
There exist major inequalities in regard to access to the available, accessible, affordable, safe, and acceptable water which in particular affects vulnerable groups such as women. Worldwide 2.4 billion people live in water-stressed countries. South Sudan is one of these countries with 59% of the population lacking access to safe water. This, in turn, indicates the importance of an international legal framework regulating access to water and sanitation for everyone without discrimination. However, violations of international law are a recurrent matter, and the efficiency of international law can be disputed. The question is, how effective is the law in providing access to water and sanitation for women. The research objective is to examine the effects of international human rights law on women’s access to water and sanitation in South Sudan. The IRAC method will be applied in order to examine the issue of lack of access to water and sanitation, identifying relevant rules and in turn applying these rules to conclude the status of the rights to water and sanitation in international law. In the interpretation of existing provisions of international law, a legal dogmatic method will be applied to determine the meaning and content of the provisions. A theoretical approach will be employed to examine the relevant principles of availability, quality and safety, accessibility, acceptability, and affordability of water and sanitation. Furthermore, it will consist of a secondary data analysis using existing data on women’s access to water and sanitation in South Sudan. The findings indicate inefficiencies in international human rights law and it is concluded that the effects of existing provisions are limited regarding women’s access to water and sanitation in South Sudan.