政策執行過程에서의 裁量性

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this thesis is to review the degree of discretion that mandated to the executor in the process of policy-implementation. This thesis consists of five chapters. The introductory chapter reviews the process of policy and the policy-implementation. The. second chapter deals with the notion of discretion, the situation in the emerging of the importance of discretion.
Discretion means authority that the executor can make a decision by himself when the decision maker's policy-instruction is ambiguous. Executor's discretion consists of the competence that he can establish the object of policy, the competence that he can choose the alternatives of policy, and the competence that he can decide the technical contents of implementation.
After 1960, Scholars recognized the importance of of the discretion in the implementation process. When the executor has much less discretion-policy cannot adapt to the implementation situation, and when he has too much discretion there is the possibility of policydistortion.
The third chapter classifies the model-policy implementation model-into three parts as follows. In the technical discretion model, policy-maker decides policy objectives and policy alternatives, and executor decides only technical contents of implementation. In the polical discretion model, policy-maker decides policy objectives, and executor decides policy alternatives and technical contents of implementation. In the executor-directory discretion model, executor decides policy objectives, policy alternatives and technical coutents of implementation, and policymaker only justifies and acknowledges these afterwards.
The fourth and fifth chapters evaluate these three implementation model and review validity boundary of each parts. Technical discretion model fits to the efficient implementation of policy and its validity boundary is the policy that has much uncertainty of implementation. Political discretion model fits to the incremental execution and its validity boundary is the policy that has intricate interest relations in implementation Executor-directory discretion model fits to accomplish the object of national development and its validity boundary is the policy-implementation that the bureaucracy of developing countries.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• I. 序論 = 5
• 1. 硏究目的 및 硏究方法 = 5
• (1) 硏究目的 = 5
• (2) 硏究範圍, 對象, 方法 = 7
• 2. 政策過程과 政策執行 = 8
• (1) 政策過程槪觀 = 8
• (2) 政策執行의 意義 = 11
• II. 政策執行過程에서의 裁量性 = 14
• 1. 政策執行者의 裁量에 對한 認識變化 = 14
• (1) 古典的 行政模型에서의 執行觀 = 15
• (2) 古典的 行政模型에서의 執行觀 批判 = 17
• (3) 政策執行過程에서의 裁量性 = 24
• 2. 執行者의 裁量의 意味와 內容 = 25
• (1) 執行에서의 裁量의 槪念 = 25
• (2) 執行者의 裁量의 內容 = 27
• 3. 執行過程에서 裁量의 重要性 = 34
• (1) 過小裁量의 경우 = 34
• (2) 過大裁量의 경우 = 35
• III. 執行類型과 그 成敗要因 = 37
• 1. 政策執行의 類型 = 37
• 2. 技術的 裁量型의 政策執行 = 40
• (1) 意義 = 40
• (2) 成敗要因과 事例 = 42
• 3. 政治的 裁量型의 政策執行 = 43
• (1) 意義 = 43
• (2) 成敗要因과 事例 = 45
• 4. 執行者 主導 裁量型의 政策執行 = 48
• (1) 意義 = 48
• (2) 成敗要因과 事例 = 51
• IV. 執行類型에 對한 評價와 適切한 執行戰略 = 58
• 1. 세 가지 執行類型에 對한 評價 = 58
• (1) 技術的 裁量型에 對한 評價 = 58
• (2) 政治的 裁量型에 對한 評價 = 60
• (3) 執行者 主導 裁量型에 對한 評價 = 63
• 2. 適切한 執行戰略의 選擇 = 64
• (1) 세 執行類型에 對한 綜合的 評價 = 65
• (2) 세 執行類型의 妥當領域의 檢討 = 66
• V. 結論 = 81
• 參考文獻 = 82
• 英文抄錄 = 85