RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Motivators of South-South Cooperation : A case of Brazil and Colombia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16080926

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울 : 韓國外國語大學校 國際地域大學院, 2022

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        2022

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 주제어
      • DDC

        918 판사항(22)

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 형태사항

        xii, 99 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        한국외국어대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
        지도교수: 김원호
        참고문헌: p. 85-99

      • UCI식별코드

        I804:11059-200000600805

      • 소장기관
        • 한국외국어대학교 글로벌캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한국외국어대학교 서울캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This thesis aims to analyze the motivators and aspects of South-South Cooperation in Brazil and Colombia, which are major donors in Latin America, where South-South Cooperation is the most actively executed.
      In common, Brazil and Colombia still have domestic development challenges, and their GDP(PPP) per capita is most similar in Latin America. However, there is a difference in that Brazil plays a prominent role as a South-South Cooperation provider, and Colombia has a significant proportion of beneficiaries among South-South Cooperation donors.
      Therefore, this study focused on these differences and thoroughly examined the patterns and cases of South-South Cooperation used as foreign policy in Brazil and Colombia.
      In Brazil and Colombia, South-South Cooperation cannot be interpreted as realist (or structural realist) factors because it is based on no conditionality, non-interference, and solidarity, and is far from pursuing material and relative interests. Therefore, this study used Wendt’s constructivist framework to analyze the differences in South-South Cooperation in each of the two countries.
      Through the analysis, it is revealed that Brazil and Colombia accept international development norms in common, but because they form their own identities and interests differently, the states’ action -South-South Cooperation- is also different.
      Also, it is derived that the aspect of South-South Cooperation can change if national identity and interest are defined differently depending on the change of regime in a country.
      번역하기

      This thesis aims to analyze the motivators and aspects of South-South Cooperation in Brazil and Colombia, which are major donors in Latin America, where South-South Cooperation is the most actively executed. In common, Brazil and Colombia still have d...

      This thesis aims to analyze the motivators and aspects of South-South Cooperation in Brazil and Colombia, which are major donors in Latin America, where South-South Cooperation is the most actively executed.
      In common, Brazil and Colombia still have domestic development challenges, and their GDP(PPP) per capita is most similar in Latin America. However, there is a difference in that Brazil plays a prominent role as a South-South Cooperation provider, and Colombia has a significant proportion of beneficiaries among South-South Cooperation donors.
      Therefore, this study focused on these differences and thoroughly examined the patterns and cases of South-South Cooperation used as foreign policy in Brazil and Colombia.
      In Brazil and Colombia, South-South Cooperation cannot be interpreted as realist (or structural realist) factors because it is based on no conditionality, non-interference, and solidarity, and is far from pursuing material and relative interests. Therefore, this study used Wendt’s constructivist framework to analyze the differences in South-South Cooperation in each of the two countries.
      Through the analysis, it is revealed that Brazil and Colombia accept international development norms in common, but because they form their own identities and interests differently, the states’ action -South-South Cooperation- is also different.
      Also, it is derived that the aspect of South-South Cooperation can change if national identity and interest are defined differently depending on the change of regime in a country.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. Introduction 1
      • 1. Background 1
      • 2. Research Question 7
      • II. Literature Review 8
      • I. Introduction 1
      • 1. Background 1
      • 2. Research Question 7
      • II. Literature Review 8
      • 1. South-South Cooperation 8
      • 1) Historical Background 8
      • 2) The Notion of South-South Cooperation 10
      • 3) Modalities of South-South Cooperation 11
      • 2. Theorical Perspective 13
      • 1) Realism and Structural Realism (Neorealism) 14
      • 2) Constructivism 18
      • 3. Analytical Framework 21
      • III. Methodology and Research Scope 24
      • IV. Brazil in South-South Cooperation 26
      • 1. International and South-South Cooperation in Brazil 26
      • 1) A history and overview 26
      • 2) Current state of South-South Cooperation in Brazil 29
      • 2. Brazilian Foreign Policy 33
      • 3. Brazil’s motivation for South-South Cooperation 37
      • 4. Case of Brazil’s South-South Cooperation 40
      • V. Colombia in South-South Cooperation 47
      • 1. International and South-South Cooperation in Colombia 47
      • 1) A history and overview 47
      • 2) Current state of South-South Cooperation in Colombia 50
      • 2. Colombian Foreign Policy 54
      • 3. Colombia’s motivation for South-South Cooperation 58
      • 4. Case of Colombia’s South-South Cooperation 61
      • VI. Analysis 67
      • 1. Brazilian Case 68
      • 2. Colombian Case 72
      • 3. Comparative analysis 75
      • VII. Conclusion 82
      • Bibliography 85
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼