This thesis aims to analyze the motivators and aspects of South-South Cooperation in Brazil and Colombia, which are major donors in Latin America, where South-South Cooperation is the most actively executed.
In common, Brazil and Colombia still have d...
This thesis aims to analyze the motivators and aspects of South-South Cooperation in Brazil and Colombia, which are major donors in Latin America, where South-South Cooperation is the most actively executed.
In common, Brazil and Colombia still have domestic development challenges, and their GDP(PPP) per capita is most similar in Latin America. However, there is a difference in that Brazil plays a prominent role as a South-South Cooperation provider, and Colombia has a significant proportion of beneficiaries among South-South Cooperation donors.
Therefore, this study focused on these differences and thoroughly examined the patterns and cases of South-South Cooperation used as foreign policy in Brazil and Colombia.
In Brazil and Colombia, South-South Cooperation cannot be interpreted as realist (or structural realist) factors because it is based on no conditionality, non-interference, and solidarity, and is far from pursuing material and relative interests. Therefore, this study used Wendt’s constructivist framework to analyze the differences in South-South Cooperation in each of the two countries.
Through the analysis, it is revealed that Brazil and Colombia accept international development norms in common, but because they form their own identities and interests differently, the states’ action -South-South Cooperation- is also different.
Also, it is derived that the aspect of South-South Cooperation can change if national identity and interest are defined differently depending on the change of regime in a country.