RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Denuclearization after Kim Jong-il's Death and the Chicken Game in Northeast Asia 2012-2014

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14225958

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      After the passing of Kim Jong-il in December 2011, the new presidency under his son, Kim Jong-un was under scrutiny. Scholars and practitioners alike debated whether there are chances that he would direct policies of the DPRK in a more cooperative, norm-abiding path that will put an end to the nuclear issue in the Peninsula, or that it would live up to the legacy of “nuclear diplomacy” that has secured the regime survival for three generations thus far. Coinciding with the leadership transitions also taking place in China, Japan and the ROK, this paper seeks to examine the prospect and solution for nuclear talks within the Six Parties in Northeast Asia, specifically on why pursuing the policy to denuclearize the DPRK will not result to progress in negotiations itself, using the framework of Chicken game.

      Keywords: North Korea, denuclearization, Chicken game, game theory, Kim Jong-un, Northeast Asia
      번역하기

      After the passing of Kim Jong-il in December 2011, the new presidency under his son, Kim Jong-un was under scrutiny. Scholars and practitioners alike debated whether there are chances that he would direct policies of the DPRK in a more cooperative, no...

      After the passing of Kim Jong-il in December 2011, the new presidency under his son, Kim Jong-un was under scrutiny. Scholars and practitioners alike debated whether there are chances that he would direct policies of the DPRK in a more cooperative, norm-abiding path that will put an end to the nuclear issue in the Peninsula, or that it would live up to the legacy of “nuclear diplomacy” that has secured the regime survival for three generations thus far. Coinciding with the leadership transitions also taking place in China, Japan and the ROK, this paper seeks to examine the prospect and solution for nuclear talks within the Six Parties in Northeast Asia, specifically on why pursuing the policy to denuclearize the DPRK will not result to progress in negotiations itself, using the framework of Chicken game.

      Keywords: North Korea, denuclearization, Chicken game, game theory, Kim Jong-un, Northeast Asia

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1
      • 1.1 Background 1
      • 1.2 Research Question 7
      • 1.3 Theoretical Framework 7
      • 1.4 Hypothesis 13
      • CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1
      • 1.1 Background 1
      • 1.2 Research Question 7
      • 1.3 Theoretical Framework 7
      • 1.4 Hypothesis 13
      • 1.5 Methodology 13
      • 1.6 Purpose and Significance of Research 15
      • 1.7 List of Contents 16
      • CHAPTER II. DPRK UNDER KIM JONG-UN’S LEADERSHIP 2012-2014 18
      • CHAPTER III. DPRK POLICIES OF THE U.S, CHINA, THE ROK, JAPAN AND RUSSIA 2012-2014 29
      • 3.1 The United States’ Policy towards the DPRK 2012-2014 29
      • 3.2 China’s Policy towards the DPRK 2012-2014 36
      • 3.3 The Republic of Korea’s Policy towards the DPRK 2012-2014 45
      • 3.4 Japan’s Policy towards the DPRK 2012-2014 51
      • 3.5 Russia’s Policy towards the DPRK 2012-2014 55
      • CHAPTER IV. ANALYSIS: CHICKEN GAME AND THE DPRK’S NUCLEAR BRINKMANSHIP 61
      • 4.1 Denuclearization as Policy Aim of the U.S, China, the ROK, Japan and Russia 61
      • 4.2 Denuclearization Viability from the Perspective of Chicken Game 67
      • 4.3 “Swerve-swerve” Condition as Possible Solution? 77
      • CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION 81
      • Bibliography 86
      • Abstract (in Korean) 91
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼