RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Maritime security : joint cooperation in the Malacca strait as a model of collective conflict management for the South China Sea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13833052

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The most important safeguard for a nation’s survival is ensuring security of its territory. In the post-Westphalian international system we have delineated boundaries; however, states are constantly seeking to gain more power to secure their place in the international order. One of the most poignant security issues facing the Asia Pacific today involves maritime security. Although the UN Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS) has created a framework for maritime water laws, boundaries are constantly disputed and vague territorial claims are made. This thesis makes a case study of maritime conflict management comparing the Malacca Strait to the South China Sea. In the Malacca Strait, a security crisis of protecting the Strait from piracy became more important than resolving territorial disputes. This research analyzes how Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore were able to negotiate a cooperative management framework amidst territorial disputes to ensure mutual security in the Malacca Strait by forming joint patrols. It then evaluates possibilities for applying this collective conflict management strategy to current disputes in the South China Sea. Ultimately, this thesis shows that cooperative conflict management can be a successful strategy not only in the cases of the Malacca Strait and South China Sea but also can be used as a model for conflict management more broadly in the Asia Pacific region. Although total agreement and resolution is nearly impossible, the international community can still agree to manage conflict in a more organized way. In light of recent rhetoric by China to create a Maritime Silk Road and establish the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), there is a small window of opportunity for the international community to persuade China to act as a responsible stakeholder. Conflict resolution is not likely, but conflict management is achievable.
      번역하기

      The most important safeguard for a nation’s survival is ensuring security of its territory. In the post-Westphalian international system we have delineated boundaries; however, states are constantly seeking to gain more power to secure their place i...

      The most important safeguard for a nation’s survival is ensuring security of its territory. In the post-Westphalian international system we have delineated boundaries; however, states are constantly seeking to gain more power to secure their place in the international order. One of the most poignant security issues facing the Asia Pacific today involves maritime security. Although the UN Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS) has created a framework for maritime water laws, boundaries are constantly disputed and vague territorial claims are made. This thesis makes a case study of maritime conflict management comparing the Malacca Strait to the South China Sea. In the Malacca Strait, a security crisis of protecting the Strait from piracy became more important than resolving territorial disputes. This research analyzes how Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore were able to negotiate a cooperative management framework amidst territorial disputes to ensure mutual security in the Malacca Strait by forming joint patrols. It then evaluates possibilities for applying this collective conflict management strategy to current disputes in the South China Sea. Ultimately, this thesis shows that cooperative conflict management can be a successful strategy not only in the cases of the Malacca Strait and South China Sea but also can be used as a model for conflict management more broadly in the Asia Pacific region. Although total agreement and resolution is nearly impossible, the international community can still agree to manage conflict in a more organized way. In light of recent rhetoric by China to create a Maritime Silk Road and establish the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), there is a small window of opportunity for the international community to persuade China to act as a responsible stakeholder. Conflict resolution is not likely, but conflict management is achievable.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Research Importance 2
      • 1.2 Methodology and Roadmap 5
      • II. Literature Review 9
      • 2.1 Theoretical Framework of State Behavior 9
      • I. Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Research Importance 2
      • 1.2 Methodology and Roadmap 5
      • II. Literature Review 9
      • 2.1 Theoretical Framework of State Behavior 9
      • 2.2 Sovereignty and Legitimacy 13
      • 2.3 Impact of Globalization on State Behavior 16
      • III. Theoretical Framework: Collective Security vs Collective Conflict Management 20
      • 3.1 Applications and Importance 26
      • IV. Maritime Security and Territorial Claims 31
      • 4.1 Water Law and Maritime Security 31
      • 4.1.1 Wilson’s Fourteen Points 33
      • 4.1.2 UN Convention on the Law of the Seas 35
      • 4.2 Maritime Security Frameworks in Southeast Asia 41
      • 4.2.1 ASEAN and the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation 43
      • 4.2.2 Code of Conduct 45
      • V. Case Study: Malacca Strait 51
      • 5.1 Historical Overview of Piracy 51
      • 5.2 Overcoming Territorial Concerns to Combat Piracy 58
      • 5.2.1 Overcoming Piracy: Lloyd’s of London Shipping Premiums 59
      • 5.2.2 Overcoming Piracy: Forming Collective Joint Security Patrols 60
      • VI. Case Study: South China Sea 64
      • 6.1 Strategic Importance 64
      • 6.2 Claimant States 67
      • 6.3 China and the South China Sea 70
      • 6.3.1 China and Multilateralism 74
      • 6.3.2 AIIB, Maritime Silk Road, and Engagement Opportunities 77
      • 6.4 Policy Recommendations 80
      • 6.4.1 United States Policy Perspective 82
      • VII. Conclusion 85
      • 7.1 Future Prospects 86
      • Bibliography 91
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼