동북아 해양레짐 연구 : 해양경계획정과 어업협정을 중심으로 = Study on North East Asia Ocean Regime : Focusing on Maritime Boundary Delimitation and Fisheries Agreement

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As the importance of ocean has risen, competitions on ocean territories throughout the international society increase rapidly. Ocean involves unlimited potential regarding fishery and petroleum resources. In the process of securing each countries' management over wider ocean territory, confrontation and conflicts have been provoked severely since the adoption of UNCLOS in 1982.
Particularly, several islands disputes and conflicts on maritime boundaries around Korea, China and Japan have been threatening the security of North East Asia region.
As a way of arbitration and settlement, the role of UNCLOS regime have been expected gradually. Especially, recent decision of ITLOS on Myanmar-Bangladesh maritime boundary delimitation case highlights the function of UNCLOS as an international ocean regime.
In this regard, this study reviews the possibility of adoption of UNCLOS on North East Asia ocean conflicts. The scope of this study is Korea, China and Japan, particularly seas embracing Korea peninsula.
The purpose of this study is first, to see the possibility of direct application of UNCLOS regime to North East Asia region, second, to review the functions of each regional ocean regimes including fisheries and sea shelf agreements, third, to find the influence and applicability of international tribunals such as ICJ and ITLOS, as a solution of North East Asia ocean conflicts focusing on some of their cases, finally to seek the ways of regional cooperation on the sea of North East Asia.
UNCLOS has been evaluated as one of the most successful international regime and has been acting its role in North East Asia. However, due to the character of enclosed-sea, universal application of UNCLOS on North East Asia region has limits. Also, the regional ocean regimes established to surmount the limits of UNCLOS do not have much actual effect.
Eventually, the formation of multilateral regional regime led by unaffected interaction between each participants in the process of socialization through the international order is needed. Especially, the adoption of New Regionalism to North East Asia ocean regime and cooperation from the bottom should be considered.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 1
• 제1절 문제의 제기 1
• 제2절 연구의 목적과 범위 1
• 제2장 유엔해양법협약과 한·중·일 해양레짐 5
• 제1절 국제레짐 이론의 성립과 흐름 5
• 1.1 국제레짐의 정의와 이론 5
• 1.2 국제레짐으로서의 유엔해양법협약 10
• 제2절 한·중·일 해양레짐으로서 유엔해양법협약의 가능성 16
• 2.1 한·중·일 해양현황 16
• 2.2 UNCLOS상 해양경계관련 규정 17
• 제3장 해양경계획정에 관한 한·중·일 지역해양레짐 23
• 제1절 한‧일 어업협정과 해양경계획정 25
• 1.1 한‧일 어업협정의 수립과 주요내용 25
• 1.2 중간수역과 독도영유권분쟁 28
• 1.3 한‧일 대륙붕협정 33
• 제2절 한‧중 어업협정과 해양경계획정 39
• 2.1 한‧중 어업협정의 수립과 주요내용 39
• 2.2 이어도 분쟁 44
• 2.3 소결 48
• 제4장 ICJ와 ITLOS의 해양경계획정분쟁 판결 동향 50
• 제1절 ICJ의 해양경계확정분쟁에 관한 판례 50
• 1.1 등거리선(Equidistance) 및 특별한 상황(Special Circumstance)의 법칙 50
• 1.2 그 밖의 주요 판결내용 52
• 제2절 ITLOS의 해양경계획정판결 56
• 2.1 미얀마‧방글라데시 배타적경제수역 및 대륙붕 경계획정분쟁에 관한 판례 56
• 2.2 소결 64
• 제5장 결론: 다자간 지역해양레짐 구축을 통한 동북아 지역 협력의 모색 67
• 제1절 동북아 지역해양레짐의 구축 67
• 1.1 동북아 해양갈등의 UNCLOS레짐을 통한 해결가능성 67
• 1.2 동북아 해양레짐에 대한 신지역주의적 접근 70
• 제2절 결어 75
• 참고문헌 78