RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      (The) ROK-US alliance cohesion under the Roh and Lee administrations

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12867930

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Under the Lee Myung-bak administration, the ROK-US alliance is often praised stronger than before. However, there is little academic study conducted to prove the rhetoric, and it is often assumed that it is a mere repercussion from the notoriously strained relations with the US during the immediately preceding Roh Moo-hyun administration. Therefore, this paper aims at testing whether the ROK-US alliance in the Lee presidency has become stronger than that in the Roh administration by performing academic analysis on a directional change of alliance strength measured in terms of alliance cohesion. To analyze alliance cohesion, four conventional indicators are employed and categorized into attitudinal and behavioral ones; threat perception and coherence in interest are the two attitudinal indicators while institutionalization and military jointness are defined as behavioral indicators. In addition, two of contemporary indicators, shared values and equitable partnership, are newly introduced in consideration of developments in the 21st-century alliance, and these six indicators forge a new model of alliance cohesion analysis. Through this new model, the study finally demonstrates that the overall cohesion level of the ROK-US alliance under the Lee administration is higher than that of the Roh administration, and it is largely due to differences in attitudinal indicators, rather than behavioral indicators. As defying the usual assumption that behaviors/actions, rather than ideational factors, bring immediate and manifest changes, it is concluded that attitudinal aspect plays a critical role in determining alliance cohesion in the case of the ROK-US alliance, and especially, attitudes and resolve of national leaders influence most. In this respect, facing change of both South Korean and US political leaderships in 2012 and the dissolution of CFC in 2015, the future of now-strong ROK-US alliance is about to hit the turbulent road ahead.
      번역하기

      Under the Lee Myung-bak administration, the ROK-US alliance is often praised stronger than before. However, there is little academic study conducted to prove the rhetoric, and it is often assumed that it is a mere repercussion from the notoriously str...

      Under the Lee Myung-bak administration, the ROK-US alliance is often praised stronger than before. However, there is little academic study conducted to prove the rhetoric, and it is often assumed that it is a mere repercussion from the notoriously strained relations with the US during the immediately preceding Roh Moo-hyun administration. Therefore, this paper aims at testing whether the ROK-US alliance in the Lee presidency has become stronger than that in the Roh administration by performing academic analysis on a directional change of alliance strength measured in terms of alliance cohesion. To analyze alliance cohesion, four conventional indicators are employed and categorized into attitudinal and behavioral ones; threat perception and coherence in interest are the two attitudinal indicators while institutionalization and military jointness are defined as behavioral indicators. In addition, two of contemporary indicators, shared values and equitable partnership, are newly introduced in consideration of developments in the 21st-century alliance, and these six indicators forge a new model of alliance cohesion analysis. Through this new model, the study finally demonstrates that the overall cohesion level of the ROK-US alliance under the Lee administration is higher than that of the Roh administration, and it is largely due to differences in attitudinal indicators, rather than behavioral indicators. As defying the usual assumption that behaviors/actions, rather than ideational factors, bring immediate and manifest changes, it is concluded that attitudinal aspect plays a critical role in determining alliance cohesion in the case of the ROK-US alliance, and especially, attitudes and resolve of national leaders influence most. In this respect, facing change of both South Korean and US political leaderships in 2012 and the dissolution of CFC in 2015, the future of now-strong ROK-US alliance is about to hit the turbulent road ahead.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. Introduction
      • II. Literature Review
      • 1. The Concept of Alliance
      • 2. Alliance Theories
      • III. Theoretical Framework
      • I. Introduction
      • II. Literature Review
      • 1. The Concept of Alliance
      • 2. Alliance Theories
      • III. Theoretical Framework
      • 1. Research Design
      • 2. Conventional Indicators of Alliance Cohesion
      • 3. Contemporary Indicators of Alliance Cohesion
      • IV. Evolution of the ROK-US Alliance
      • 1. History of the ROK-US Alliance
      • 2. Alliance of the 21st Century
      • V. A Directional Change of the ROK-US Alliance Cohesion
      • 1. Change in Behavioral Indicators
      • 2. Change in Attitudinal Indicators
      • 3. Change in Alliance Cohesion
      • VI. Conclusion
      • Bibliography
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼