RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      the construction and deconstruction of orientalism in robinson crusoe , the king and I and m. butterfly

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12676537

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        부산 : 동의대학교 대학원, 2012

      • 학위논문사항

        Thesis(Master) -- 동의대학교 대학원 , 영어영문학과

      • 발행연도

        2012

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 발행국(도시)

        대한민국

      • 형태사항

        ; 26cm

      • 소장기관
        • 동의대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this paper is to analyze Robinson Crusoe (1719), The King and I (1945), and M. Butterfly (1988) from the perspective of Edward W. Said’s Orientalism (1978). Robinson Crusoe and The King and I have been used as favored texts for the scholars of Orientalism to reveal the origin and development of the mechanism of Orientalism. Lots of research on M. Butterfly has been done in the context of post-colonialism, multiculturalism and postmodernism. In this paper, the three works are combined and analyzed in the context of Orientalism. Considering the close relationship between post-colonialism and Orientalism, and the two faces of Orientalism, M. Butterfly can serve as the counter part to Robinson Crusoe and The King and I in the discourse of Orientalism. In a sense, the construction of the Orientalism in the two works is fully deconstructed by M. Butterfly.
      From the perspectives of post-colonialism, cultural imperialism and multiculturalism, there is a lot of research that has been completed on Robinson Crusoe, The King and I and M. Butterfly. There are also some authors of different countries that have researched Orientalism successfully in each of the three works. But no one combines the different works together to reflect the dual characters of Orientalism. In this study, through the analysis of the three works, the meaning of the construction and deconstruction of Orientalism can be clearly revealed to readers. With the background of the Orientalism, it also shows readers the whole process from the construction of Orientals to the deconstruction of Orientals.
      In each of these works, the Orient as “the Other” plays a pivotal role in the construction and deconstruction of the Orientalism. This paper will comprehensively explain the changes in the role and function of “the Other” as it relates to the construction and deconstruction of Orientalism.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this paper is to analyze Robinson Crusoe (1719), The King and I (1945), and M. Butterfly (1988) from the perspective of Edward W. Said’s Orientalism (1978). Robinson Crusoe and The King and I have been used as favored texts for the sc...

      The purpose of this paper is to analyze Robinson Crusoe (1719), The King and I (1945), and M. Butterfly (1988) from the perspective of Edward W. Said’s Orientalism (1978). Robinson Crusoe and The King and I have been used as favored texts for the scholars of Orientalism to reveal the origin and development of the mechanism of Orientalism. Lots of research on M. Butterfly has been done in the context of post-colonialism, multiculturalism and postmodernism. In this paper, the three works are combined and analyzed in the context of Orientalism. Considering the close relationship between post-colonialism and Orientalism, and the two faces of Orientalism, M. Butterfly can serve as the counter part to Robinson Crusoe and The King and I in the discourse of Orientalism. In a sense, the construction of the Orientalism in the two works is fully deconstructed by M. Butterfly.
      From the perspectives of post-colonialism, cultural imperialism and multiculturalism, there is a lot of research that has been completed on Robinson Crusoe, The King and I and M. Butterfly. There are also some authors of different countries that have researched Orientalism successfully in each of the three works. But no one combines the different works together to reflect the dual characters of Orientalism. In this study, through the analysis of the three works, the meaning of the construction and deconstruction of Orientalism can be clearly revealed to readers. With the background of the Orientalism, it also shows readers the whole process from the construction of Orientals to the deconstruction of Orientals.
      In each of these works, the Orient as “the Other” plays a pivotal role in the construction and deconstruction of the Orientalism. This paper will comprehensively explain the changes in the role and function of “the Other” as it relates to the construction and deconstruction of Orientalism.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I.Introduction 1
      • II.Edward Said and Orientalism 4
      • III. Construction of Orientalisilm 8
      • I.Introduction 1
      • II.Edward Said and Orientalism 4
      • III. Construction of Orientalisilm 8
      • A. The West as Savior: Robinson Crusoe 9
      • B. The West as Teacher: The King and I 18
      • IV. Deconstruction of Orientalism: The West as Victim in M. Butterfly 27
      • V.Conclusion 36
      • Works Cited 38
      • Abstract 40
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼