김대중 정부 시기 북한의 통일.대남정책과 남북관계 변화 = The Study on the North Korea's South Korean policy and the change of relation between South and North Korea : focused on the period of Kim Dae Jung government

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This dissertation focused on the understanding of general idea and analysing of co-relations between North Korea's unification and South Korean policy. Be based on the concept, North Korea's unification and South Korean policy was researched by using the concept of succession and transformation. Before 1990s, the definition of two policies were ambiguous, however, North Korea's policy could be classified in the period of Kim Dea Jung government.
'Namchosunhukmyoungron'(Revolutionalism of South Korean) and '3daehukmyoungganwharon'(Enforcement of Three Revolutions) could recaged as North Korea's unification policies, it was sufficiently explaining the North Korea's South Korean policy as North Korean was willing to reunify by their absorbing South Korean between 1980s to 1990s. Nevertheless, North Korea had suffered difficult that it was impossible to explain the two policies' definitions as changing of international environment such as Post-Cold War, the collapse of USSR and their economical crisis since 1990s.
North Korean government executed aggressive unification policy towards South Korea during the Cold War, the South Korean policy was a part of their unification policy. This trend continued until South Korean's economic outcome overtaken North Korean's one by the end of 1980s. However, at the same time of collapse of Cold War, North Korean's unification strategies were faltering. Unification policy was not unification under communism and for survival of its state, South Korean policy modified towards peaceful existence. South Korean Policy was not curbed physically and spiritually from unification policy in the period of Post-Cold War. In this time, North Korean's two policies adapted political environment and its features were realism, after the 2000 South-North Korean summit, these policies changed towards realism and utilitarianism.
North Korean unification strategies were more focused on the national reconciliation than revolution of Korean Peninsular since 2000s. North Korean official went against principal of 'former anti-external circumstance', they focused 'later the person directly involved solution'. Moreover, their strategies changed of direction from 'radical unification' to 'gradual unification'.
According to the 6.15 announcement, the South-North relation expanded quantitatively as well as qualitatively. The aggressive perspective about South Korean had changed and two countries had hold the minister-level discussion as the overall responsibility for the relations. Over the years, much about the organization has changed, most noticeably its transformation into the department of minister about South Korean policy and new association established by government.
Undergo a transformation, it was non-homogeneity each realms that political and military sectors made slow process than socio-cultural exchange and cooperation relatively. Notwithstanding of non-homogeneity, South Korean government's perspective was an affirmative response about North Korea's two policies.
Kim Dae Jung government tried to change the environment of South - North relations from competitive to peaceful since 1998. In based on the national security problems, South Korean's engagement policy towards North Korea reduced the Korean Peninsular's tension and risk, and then it could change the North Korean's unification policy and South Korean policy.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구목적과 필요성 = 1
• 제2절 선행연구 검토 = 2
• 제3절 연구의 방법과 범위 = 6
• 제2장 북한의 통일과 대남정책의 개념과 상관관계 = 7
• 제1절 통일정책과 대남정책의 개념 = 7
• 제2절 통일정책과 대남정책의 상관관계 = 17
• 제3장 김대중 정부 시기 북한의 통일 및 대남정책 = 19
• 제1절 북한의 통일 및 대남정책 결정요인 = 19
• 1. 대내적 요인: 심각한 경제난과 체제위기 의식 = 19
• 2. 대외적 요인: 사회주의권 붕괴와 남한의 대북포용 정책 = 23
• 제2절 북한의 통일정책 변화 = 26
• 1. ′남조선혁명론′에서 ′우리민족끼리′론으로 = 26
• 2. ′배타적 자주′에서 ′열린 자주′로 = 29
• 3. ′급진적 통일′에서 ′단계적 통일′로 = 31
• 제3절 북한의 대남정책 변화 = 34
• 1. 대정부 인식의 변화: 적대적에서 우호적으로 = 34
• 2. 대남정책기구의 변화 = 43
• 제4장 남북관계 발전 = 49
• 제1절 경협의 제도화 = 49
• 1. 남북경제협력추진위원회 = 50
• 2. 경제협력의 성과와 과제 = 54
• 제2절 사회문화 교류의 확대 = 61
• 1. 분야별 교류협력 활성화 = 62
• 2. 남북문화 교류의 성과와 과제 = 65
• 제3절 대남 군사 정책의 변화: 낮은 수준에서의 협력 모색 = 68
• 1. 남북 군사회담 = 69
• 2. 군사대화의 성과와 과제 = 74
• 제5장 결론 = 76
• 참고문헌 = 80
• Abstract = 87