Variable insurance separate account held by life insurers can be said to be a sort of trust fund of the policyholders, but its occurring income in variable insurance, as an exception of taxation on trust fund are added intogeneral account of life insu...
Variable insurance separate account held by life insurers can be said to be a sort of trust fund of the policyholders, but its occurring income in variable insurance, as an exception of taxation on trust fund are added intogeneral account of life insurance company before being taxed, so profit and loss occurring in transaction is considered as taxable income, but profit and loss on valuation is treated as unrealized profit and loss and not taxed.
Such corporate tax system creates an opportunity for life insurers to adjust transaction timing of trading securities, a major investment under separate account of variable insurance, to lesson burden on corporate tax on their general account. But the problem here is that there arises a possible conflict of interest among variable policy holders.
Therefore, purpose of this study is to identify whether or not adjustment of transaction timing of trading securities under separate account of variable insurance depending on change in marginal tax rate and taxable income creates a possibility of the conflict of interest among investors (i.e. variable insurance policyholders), with substantial evidence.
To do this, the study conducted empirical analysis on all life insurers operating in Korea from the period of 2003 – 2007.
Summary of the study results is as follows.
First, the univariate analysis t-test showed that life insurers with higher marginal tax rate (when deficit carried over remains) saw meaningful changes in an average discretionary profit and loss ratio on valuation of trading securities at the year-end variable separate account.
Second, the regression analysis found that marginal tax rate of life insurers (whether or not they have deficit carried over) significantly affected discretionary profit and loss ratio on valuation of trading securities at the year-end variable separate account.
Third, the regression analysis result did not find evidence that growth in fiscal income has a meaningful impact on discretionary profit and loss ratio on valuation at the year-end variable separate account. However, the study assumes that that outcome was due to a possible error in the research methodology.
Taking all these into consideration, life insurers make timing adjustment for trading securities transaction, a major investment under variable insurance separate account, to reduce their corporate tax burden on general account. But it does not necessarily mean that such adjustments made by life insurers directly lead to creation of a conflict of interest among variable insurance policyholders. At least, the study found that there is a possibility for it.
In the meantime, this study has limitations as follows.
First, number of this study sample is just 85,although it surveyed all life insurers operating in Korea from the period of 2003 – 2007, which can affect reliability of the study. However not enough the number of samples may be, the study targeted all life insurers in the Korean market for the period when sales of variable insurance have activated, so the research had inevitably go on.
Second, the study failed to find significant evidence that shows growth in taxable income affects timing of transaction of trading securities under variable insurance separate account. It might be because of incomparability of change in taxable income and fiscal income, which should be dealt with possibly in next research.
Third, the study presumed that life insurers with fiscal income growth,but no carried-over deficit have higher marginal tax rate. In the meantime, Grahan (1996a, 1996b) and Jong Kwon, Ko (2002) assumed that the past time-series taxable income follows randomwalk model with trend component, and used taxable income forecast of the next 5 years in simulation to measure marginal tax rate. If this study used this sophisticated methodology for obtaining marginal tax rate, it could increase its reliability furthermore.
Fourth, the research and survey of this study was conducted when many life insurers had their deficit carried over deducted for their corporate tax income. Therefore, these companies could have made more active selective transactions for variable insurance securities than those with deficit carried over in tax deduction period. However, the study looks into impact of deficit carried over on transaction of variable insurance securities only as the study could not obtain many samples. The study results could be more interesting and compelling when it draws on many samples and surveys.