RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Ways of reading, ways of teaching: Literary theory as a reading strategy.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12106560

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Traditional reading strategies focus on reading for information - summarizing and recalling main ideas. Reading literature, however, requires discipline-specific reading strategies (Lee, 2004). Just as historiography informs the reading of history, (Wineburg, 1998), literary theory informs the study of literature (Scholes, 1985). One's theoretical perspective determines the focus of interpretation - whether on the text itself, the context of textual production, or the experience of the reader (Grossman, 1991). This study frames disciplinary literacy in literature studies as grounded in literary theory and explores the implications for teacher learning and student learning. It connects professional development, teacher knowledge, classroom practice, and student learning; that is, what it would mean for teachers and students to develop this kind of disciplinary knowledge, and what it would take to get them there.
    This research explored twelve literature teachers' prior knowledge and practice and examined their participation in a professional development intervention, during which the teachers: explored their own and alternative approaches to texts, deepened their understanding of literary theory, and developed unit plans to teach multiple theoretical approaches to literature. Following the workshop, I observed and supported four teachers' practice and assessed their students' learning. Data include: teacher and student interviews, classroom observations, student learning assessments, and artifacts of teacher and student work.
    A series of three free-standing papers - with corresponding literature reviews and methods sections - tease out individual threads of the interwoven study. The first paper, examining teacher learning, develops a three-dimensional model of the reciprocal, mutually supportive relationship between content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and pedagogical knowledge as structured around a teacher's orientation to the discipline. The second, a case study of one classroom, connects teacher learning and student learning, and highlights the importance of representation and ownership of ideas. The third paper explores literary theory as a framework for interpretive reading strategies, examining student learning across four 9th grade classes, and focusing primarily on the experiences of marginalized readers. Data suggest that interpretive frameworks empowered students to deepen comprehension and develop multiple theoretically-grounded interpretations of literary and non-school texts.
    번역하기

    Traditional reading strategies focus on reading for information - summarizing and recalling main ideas. Reading literature, however, requires discipline-specific reading strategies (Lee, 2004). Just as historiography informs the reading of history, (...

    Traditional reading strategies focus on reading for information - summarizing and recalling main ideas. Reading literature, however, requires discipline-specific reading strategies (Lee, 2004). Just as historiography informs the reading of history, (Wineburg, 1998), literary theory informs the study of literature (Scholes, 1985). One's theoretical perspective determines the focus of interpretation - whether on the text itself, the context of textual production, or the experience of the reader (Grossman, 1991). This study frames disciplinary literacy in literature studies as grounded in literary theory and explores the implications for teacher learning and student learning. It connects professional development, teacher knowledge, classroom practice, and student learning; that is, what it would mean for teachers and students to develop this kind of disciplinary knowledge, and what it would take to get them there.
    This research explored twelve literature teachers' prior knowledge and practice and examined their participation in a professional development intervention, during which the teachers: explored their own and alternative approaches to texts, deepened their understanding of literary theory, and developed unit plans to teach multiple theoretical approaches to literature. Following the workshop, I observed and supported four teachers' practice and assessed their students' learning. Data include: teacher and student interviews, classroom observations, student learning assessments, and artifacts of teacher and student work.
    A series of three free-standing papers - with corresponding literature reviews and methods sections - tease out individual threads of the interwoven study. The first paper, examining teacher learning, develops a three-dimensional model of the reciprocal, mutually supportive relationship between content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and pedagogical knowledge as structured around a teacher's orientation to the discipline. The second, a case study of one classroom, connects teacher learning and student learning, and highlights the importance of representation and ownership of ideas. The third paper explores literary theory as a framework for interpretive reading strategies, examining student learning across four 9th grade classes, and focusing primarily on the experiences of marginalized readers. Data suggest that interpretive frameworks empowered students to deepen comprehension and develop multiple theoretically-grounded interpretations of literary and non-school texts.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼