RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      THE U.S. FOREIGN POLICY SHIFT TOWARD CHINA : Why did the George W. Bush administration define China's role as a responsible stakeholder? = 미국 대중정책의 변화; 왜 부시행정부는 중국의 역할을 책임있는 이해상관자로 정의했는가?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11753907

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The U.S.-China relations under the George W. Bush administration are divided into 4 periods; the growing tensions period (2001. 1 - 2001. 9), the cooperative period (2001. 9 - 2004. 12), the frozen period (2005. 1 - 2005. 8), and the reshaping period (2005. 9 - ). Both countries experienced 3 transitions in their bilateral relations and it was mainly influenced by the U.S. foreign policy shifts toward China. Particularly, in September 2005, the U.S. began to reshape its relationship with China by defining China's role as a responsible stakeholder in the international community. It implied that the U.S. urged China to be more responsible for global issues and more integrated into the international system.
      Several factors led to the U.S. foreign policy shift toward China and led the U.S. to recognise China as a stakeholder. Those factors can be categorised into external (international) factors and internal (domestic) factors. External factors are the rising China, the Middle East problem (Iran and Iraq), North Korea and China's leading role in the Six Party Talks, U.S.-China economic relations, and China's needs. Internally, the shift was derived from the improved public view on China, the growing concerns of the U.S. Congress about China, and the favourable perception of China at the cabinet level.
      The current U.S. policy toward China could be described as 'Concessional and Conforming Engagement'. By supporting the peaceful rise of China, the U.S. has admitted China's growing power, concerned how China would use its growing power, and required China to follow international common values shared by other states.
      번역하기

      The U.S.-China relations under the George W. Bush administration are divided into 4 periods; the growing tensions period (2001. 1 - 2001. 9), the cooperative period (2001. 9 - 2004. 12), the frozen period (2005. 1 - 2005. 8), and the reshaping period ...

      The U.S.-China relations under the George W. Bush administration are divided into 4 periods; the growing tensions period (2001. 1 - 2001. 9), the cooperative period (2001. 9 - 2004. 12), the frozen period (2005. 1 - 2005. 8), and the reshaping period (2005. 9 - ). Both countries experienced 3 transitions in their bilateral relations and it was mainly influenced by the U.S. foreign policy shifts toward China. Particularly, in September 2005, the U.S. began to reshape its relationship with China by defining China's role as a responsible stakeholder in the international community. It implied that the U.S. urged China to be more responsible for global issues and more integrated into the international system.
      Several factors led to the U.S. foreign policy shift toward China and led the U.S. to recognise China as a stakeholder. Those factors can be categorised into external (international) factors and internal (domestic) factors. External factors are the rising China, the Middle East problem (Iran and Iraq), North Korea and China's leading role in the Six Party Talks, U.S.-China economic relations, and China's needs. Internally, the shift was derived from the improved public view on China, the growing concerns of the U.S. Congress about China, and the favourable perception of China at the cabinet level.
      The current U.S. policy toward China could be described as 'Concessional and Conforming Engagement'. By supporting the peaceful rise of China, the U.S. has admitted China's growing power, concerned how China would use its growing power, and required China to follow international common values shared by other states.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Chapter 1. Introduction = 1
      • Chapter 2. Theoretical Backgrounds and Framework of the Analysis = 5
      • 2.1. Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) = 5
      • 2.2. Levels of analysis and comparative perspective = 7
      • 2.3. Globalisation and intermestic approach = 9
      • Chapter 1. Introduction = 1
      • Chapter 2. Theoretical Backgrounds and Framework of the Analysis = 5
      • 2.1. Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) = 5
      • 2.2. Levels of analysis and comparative perspective = 7
      • 2.3. Globalisation and intermestic approach = 9
      • 2.4. Structure of the thesis = 13
      • Chapter 3. Comparative Analysis of U.S.-China Relations = 14
      • 3.1. Brief history of U.S.-China relations = 14
      • 3.2. The U.S.-China relations under the Bush administration = 16
      • 3.2.1. The growing tensions period (2001. 1 - 2001. 9) = 17
      • 3.2.2. The cooperative period (2001. 9 - 2004. 12) = 18
      • 3.2.3. The frozen period (2005. 1 - 2005. 8) = 19
      • 3.2.4. The reshaping period (2005. 9 - ) = 22
      • 3.3. The U.S. view of China as a responsible stakeholder = 26
      • 3.4. Intermestic factors affecting the reshaping of U.S.-China relations = 27
      • 3.4.1. External factors = 27
      • 3.4.1.1. The rising of China = 27
      • 3.4.1.2. The Middle East problem = 29
      • 3.4.1.3. North Korea and the Six Party Talks = 33
      • 3.4.1.4. U.S.-China economic relations = 35
      • 3.4.1.5. China's needs = 37
      • 3.4.2. Internal factors = 38
      • 3.4.2.1. The public view on China improving = 38
      • 3.4.2.2. The growing concerns of the U.S. Congress about China = 40
      • 3.4.2.3. The favourable perception of China in the cabinet = 44
      • Chapter 4. Conclusion : The U.S. engagement with China = 50
      • References = 55
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼