DISC행동유형과 건강증진행위 및 건강상태와의 관계 = (A) study on health promotion behaviors and health conditions related to DISC behavior characteristics

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

ABSTRACT

A Study on Health Promotion Behaviors and Health Conditions Related to DISC Behavior Characteristics


Lim, Wan-Sook
Major in Nursing Administration
Graduate School of Public Administration
Kyung Hee University

This study is to grasp individual's DISC behavior characteristic, health promotion behavior, and health condition in order to provide foundation data for efficient health care by analyzing the coefficient correlation of health promotion behavior and health condition.
The subject of this study is 370 female and male adult residents in Seoul and Kyeonggi-do, who are over twenty years old. The survey was held between March 20th to April 15, 2009.
The DISC behavior examination, health promotion behavior and health condition measuring tools were used for the research tools.
According to the study purpose, collected data were analyzed by the SPSS win 15.0 Program to the percentage, average and standard deviation, and pearsons coefficient correlation.

Following is the results of this study.

1) The general characteristics of subjects were that 56% of subjects were 30 to 49 years old and the average age was 39.56. Among subjects there were more female, college graduates, non-smokers, religious ones, and employers also most of subjects were non-drinkers, occasionally work out, and have breakfast everyday.

2) The distribution of subjects' DISC behavior characteristic was , D(Dominance), I(Influence), S(Steadiness), C(Conscientiousness) as in order.
Confirming the results subjects' health promotion achievement degree, average of 2.60 out of 4 as a full marks. The interpersonal relation behaviors and the self-realization behavior achievement degree was the highest.
The result of subjects's health condition was that subjects complained 12 symptoms out of 82 symptoms, and among the symptoms fatigue was the most then digestion and skin; muscle and skeletal complaints were the least.
Comparing the achievement degree of the health promotion affected by the DISC behavior characteristics, every results showed significant differences among them I(Influence) was the highest and S(Steadiness) was the lowest. Although there was no significant differences between the DISC behavior characteristics and health condition. In addition, among health condition I(Influence) was the best in the health condition, S(Steadiness) was the worst in the health condition.

3) There was positive correlation coefficient between DISC behavior characteristics and health promotion behavior, but there wasn't any correlation coefficient between the DISC behavior and the health condition. I(Influence) had the highest corelation coefficient then C(Conscientiousness), D(Dominance), S(Steadiness) as in order. I(Influence) had positive corelation coefficient with the health promotion behavior, and S(Steadiness) had negative corelation coefficient with the health promotion behavior.
Aslo, the health promotion behavior and health condition had positive corelation coefficient.

According to the results, the DISC behavior characteristics don't directly affect individual health condition, however, the DISC behavior characteristics do significantly affect health promotion behavior. As the research found that the high health promotion behavior degree promotes health condition, the DISC behavior characteristic affects health promotion behavior and health condition direct and indirectly. Hence, finding many plans, which considered self DISC behavior characteristic, will be efficient to increase health promotion achievements.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• Ⅰ. 서 론 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯1
• 2. 연구목적⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯3
• 3. 용어의 정의 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯4
• Ⅱ. 문헌고찰⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 6
• 1. DISC 행동 유형과 건강과의 관계 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 6
• 2. 건강 증진 행위와 건강 상태와의 관계 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 10
• 3. 선행연구⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 12
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 14
• 1. 연구설계⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 14
• 2. 연구대상 및 자료수집 방법⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 14
• 3. 연구도구⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 14
• 4. 자료 분석 방법⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 16
• 5. 연구의 제한점 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 17
• Ⅳ. 연구결과⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 18
• 1. 연구 대상자들의 일반적 특성 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 18
• 2. 연구대상자들의 DISC 행동유형⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯20
• 3. 연구대상자들의 건강 증진 행위수행 정도 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯21
• 4. 연구대상자들의 건강 상태 정도 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯22
• 5. DISC 행동유형에 따른 건강증진행위 비교 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 24
• 6. DISC 행동유형에 따른 건강상태 비교 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 25
• 7. DISC행동유형과 건강증진행위, 건강상태간의 상관관계 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 27
• Ⅴ. 논 의 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 29
• Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 34
• 1. 결 론⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 34
• 2. 제 언⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯ 36
• 참고 문헌
• 부 록
• ABSTRACT