RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    사례를 통해 본 전쟁종결에 관한 연구 = A Study on The Case of Conditions for The Ends of War

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11632935

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Although there has been various studies on general's leadership and what causes a war, studies on the end of war are not good enough. The end of war, however, is very important as well as interesting. For example, even though the U.S. declared the end of Iraq war only after 43 days from the first attack in 2003, it is still making much efforts without evident outcomes of stabilities. One of the reason for that is there was not an adequate end of war at that time.
    A study on the end of war may provide a systematic approach method on a form of end of war, conditions and a proper time. It is applicable to inter-Korean peace agreement and conflicts against other nations.
    For the purpose mentioned above, this paper thus attempts to provide analysis framework through a theoretical study on war and the end of war. It also identifies the key factors on the end of war from the studies on the reasons of war and cases of the end of war. Additionally, it shows how the end of war influences an international order.
    The results of this study are as followings.
    First, this study established analysis framework through diverse researches on the end of war. It examined variables which influence the end of war based on the studies by Lewis A Coser, Carroll and Jonghak Lee. The variables of the end of war was divided into two categories: external factors(an international order after war and internatinal opinions) and internal factors(politics, capabilities to wage war and unity of the people.) The way of the end of war was limited to the conditions that there was a peace treay in case of obvious win and lose based on the studies by Paul R. Pillar, Takamine Hideyuki, Changil On and Youngjun Park.
    Second, it identified the reasons why the nations entered the war(the First and Second World War, the Gulf War and the Iraq War) from the view of winner nations based on the analysis framework, and analyzed national and military strategy. After that, how those strategies affected the end of war was examined.
    Lastly, this study drew prior considerations for the end of war, modern and future war, through analyzing the process and form of the end of war, how the key factors for them and the way of the end of war influenced a post-war international order.
    번역하기

    Although there has been various studies on general's leadership and what causes a war, studies on the end of war are not good enough. The end of war, however, is very important as well as interesting. For example, even though the U.S. declared the end...

    Although there has been various studies on general's leadership and what causes a war, studies on the end of war are not good enough. The end of war, however, is very important as well as interesting. For example, even though the U.S. declared the end of Iraq war only after 43 days from the first attack in 2003, it is still making much efforts without evident outcomes of stabilities. One of the reason for that is there was not an adequate end of war at that time.
    A study on the end of war may provide a systematic approach method on a form of end of war, conditions and a proper time. It is applicable to inter-Korean peace agreement and conflicts against other nations.
    For the purpose mentioned above, this paper thus attempts to provide analysis framework through a theoretical study on war and the end of war. It also identifies the key factors on the end of war from the studies on the reasons of war and cases of the end of war. Additionally, it shows how the end of war influences an international order.
    The results of this study are as followings.
    First, this study established analysis framework through diverse researches on the end of war. It examined variables which influence the end of war based on the studies by Lewis A Coser, Carroll and Jonghak Lee. The variables of the end of war was divided into two categories: external factors(an international order after war and internatinal opinions) and internal factors(politics, capabilities to wage war and unity of the people.) The way of the end of war was limited to the conditions that there was a peace treay in case of obvious win and lose based on the studies by Paul R. Pillar, Takamine Hideyuki, Changil On and Youngjun Park.
    Second, it identified the reasons why the nations entered the war(the First and Second World War, the Gulf War and the Iraq War) from the view of winner nations based on the analysis framework, and analyzed national and military strategy. After that, how those strategies affected the end of war was examined.
    Lastly, this study drew prior considerations for the end of war, modern and future war, through analyzing the process and form of the end of war, how the key factors for them and the way of the end of war influenced a post-war international order.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 第1章 서론 = 1
    • 第1節 연구목적 및 문제의 제기 = 1
    • 第2節 연구 범위 및 방법 = 4
    • 第2章 전쟁에 관한 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 第1節 전쟁의 개념 = 6
    • 第1章 서론 = 1
    • 第1節 연구목적 및 문제의 제기 = 1
    • 第2節 연구 범위 및 방법 = 4
    • 第2章 전쟁에 관한 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 第1節 전쟁의 개념 = 6
    • 第2節 전쟁의 원인 = 9
    • 第3節 전쟁종결에 관한 제이론 = 21
    • 第4節 분석의 틀 = 26
    • 第3章 제1차 세계대전 이후 사례 분석 = 28
    • 第1節 주요 전쟁별 원인 / 배경 = 28
    • 1. 제1차 세계대전 = 28
    • 2. 제2차 세계대전 = 30
    • 3. 걸프전 = 32
    • 4. 이라크 전쟁 = 34
    • 第2節 각 전쟁의 국가전략 및 군사전략 = 37
    • 1. 제1차 세계대전 = 37
    • 2. 제2차 세계대전 = 40
    • 3. 걸프전 = 43
    • 4. 이라크 전쟁 = 46
    • 第4章 주요 전쟁의 종결 사례 분석 = 49
    • 제1節 각 전쟁의 종결과정 = 49
    • 1. 제1차 세계대전 = 49
    • 2. 제2차 세계대전 = 52
    • 3. 걸프전 = 54
    • 4. 이라크 전쟁 = 56
    • 第2節 전쟁종결에 영향을 미친 요인 분석 = 57
    • 1. 제1차 세계대전 = 57
    • 2. 제2차 세계대전 = 61
    • 3. 걸프전 = 66
    • 4. 이라크 전쟁 = 70
    • 第3節 전쟁종결 방식이 국제질서에 미친 영향 = 73
    • 1. 제1차 세계대전 = 73
    • 2. 제2차 세계대전 = 74
    • 3. 걸프전 = 76
    • 4. 이라크 전쟁 = 78
    • 第5章 결론 = 80
    • 參考文獻 = 85
    • ABSTRACT = 92
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼