RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Regional integration and the challenge of economic development: The case of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA).

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10743970

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      [S.l.]: Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark 2005

    • 학위수여대학

      Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark

    • 수여연도

      2005

    • 작성언어

      영어

    • 주제어
    • 학위

      Ph.D.

    • 페이지수

      238 p.

    • 지도교수/심사위원

      Director: Carlos Seiglie.

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Many African countries consider regional integration as a vehicle for achieving economic development. This could be seen from the many regional integration frameworks aimed at promoting intra-regional trade, investment and development. Several studies have been conducted on the "failure" of regional integration in Africa, focusing on the security arrangements and the static effects of integration. As a result, little has been done on the dynamic effects of regional integration in Africa. This case study focuses on the political and economic aspects of regional integration in Eastern and Southern Africa. It discusses how harmonization of policy in infrastructure, trade and investment and multilateral negotiations can address the economic development of the region.
    Using the case-study methodology, the research considers the measures taken by the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (Comesa) to promote trade, investment, and infrastructure development as well as to advance the goals of the region in multilateral negotiations. The eclectic approach used in the analysis benefits from political science theory on regional integration as well as the customs union theory of economics thus providing a robust approach to the study of Comesa. This includes the use of computable general equilibrium (CGE) models to compute trade creation and trade diversion, intra-regional trade and infrastructure statistics, reports and interviews with stakeholders.
    The results indicate that Comesa has made major advancements in establishing the institutional architecture to promote regional integration and development. There is a lot of progress in the harmonization of policy, coordination of multilateral negotiations as well as increased intra-Comesa trade with the establishment of the Free Trade Area. However, inspite of the positive results of CGE models, intra-regional trade remains minimal at 15% of global trade. In addition, the harmonization of policy and development of joint programmes is hampered by lack of political will and limited resources, among other constraints.
    The findings suggest new approaches to regional integration in Africa focused on the dynamic effects such as policy harmonization and multilateral negotiations. It further suggests policy recommendations that would address the political, economic and institutional constraints to regional integration in Africa.
    번역하기

    Many African countries consider regional integration as a vehicle for achieving economic development. This could be seen from the many regional integration frameworks aimed at promoting intra-regional trade, investment and development. Several studie...

    Many African countries consider regional integration as a vehicle for achieving economic development. This could be seen from the many regional integration frameworks aimed at promoting intra-regional trade, investment and development. Several studies have been conducted on the "failure" of regional integration in Africa, focusing on the security arrangements and the static effects of integration. As a result, little has been done on the dynamic effects of regional integration in Africa. This case study focuses on the political and economic aspects of regional integration in Eastern and Southern Africa. It discusses how harmonization of policy in infrastructure, trade and investment and multilateral negotiations can address the economic development of the region.
    Using the case-study methodology, the research considers the measures taken by the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (Comesa) to promote trade, investment, and infrastructure development as well as to advance the goals of the region in multilateral negotiations. The eclectic approach used in the analysis benefits from political science theory on regional integration as well as the customs union theory of economics thus providing a robust approach to the study of Comesa. This includes the use of computable general equilibrium (CGE) models to compute trade creation and trade diversion, intra-regional trade and infrastructure statistics, reports and interviews with stakeholders.
    The results indicate that Comesa has made major advancements in establishing the institutional architecture to promote regional integration and development. There is a lot of progress in the harmonization of policy, coordination of multilateral negotiations as well as increased intra-Comesa trade with the establishment of the Free Trade Area. However, inspite of the positive results of CGE models, intra-regional trade remains minimal at 15% of global trade. In addition, the harmonization of policy and development of joint programmes is hampered by lack of political will and limited resources, among other constraints.
    The findings suggest new approaches to regional integration in Africa focused on the dynamic effects such as policy harmonization and multilateral negotiations. It further suggests policy recommendations that would address the political, economic and institutional constraints to regional integration in Africa.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼