RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Dying for attention: Television coverage and American participation in humanitarian crises during the post-Cold War era.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10602007

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The increase in 'real-time' coverage of international events has lead some policymakers to believe television media, rather than traditional foreign policy elites, set American policy agenda on complex humanitarian crises. This study analyses four such crises during the 1990's---Somalia, Sudan, Rwanda and East Timor---to determine the relationship between television news and American foreign policy. I argue that to determine if television media influences American foreign policy, it is necessary to analyze not only news content, but also administration policy decisions throughout a crisis.
      My analysis utilizes process tracing and content analysis over two issue areas: famine and genocide, testing three separate models---Indexing, the CNN Effect, and Mediated Policymaking---with each model predicting different patterns of agenda setting behavior. I draw upon a variety of primary sources to establish the news frames, pictorial images, and policies present during the crises, including news stories from the Vanderbilt Television News Archives, declassified government documents from the National Security Archive, and statements from the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents and Foreign Policy Bulletin.
      My findings indicate that television news did not influence policy in the four cases analyzed. Most crisis stories either aired simultaneously with administration policy decisions or shortly after decisions had been made, suggesting that television follows the government's lead during emerging humanitarian crises. Furthermore, when looking at the content of the media coverage, the trend is to support the administration's policy decisions, with instances of intervention garnering substantial airtime and positive portrayals of American efforts. In cases of non-intervention, minimal coverage to the crisis is given, and no effort is made to explain why the crisis is politically unimportant. Finally, while dramatic images of suffering do appear in coverage of all four cases, the dramatic impact of these compelling visuals is downplayed, when the verbal content of the stories is taken into account: story lines were devoted to issues other than the need for intervention. Given these results, I conclude that Indexing and Mediated Policymaking best describe the relationship between the media and policymakers.
      번역하기

      The increase in 'real-time' coverage of international events has lead some policymakers to believe television media, rather than traditional foreign policy elites, set American policy agenda on complex humanitarian crises. This study analyses four su...

      The increase in 'real-time' coverage of international events has lead some policymakers to believe television media, rather than traditional foreign policy elites, set American policy agenda on complex humanitarian crises. This study analyses four such crises during the 1990's---Somalia, Sudan, Rwanda and East Timor---to determine the relationship between television news and American foreign policy. I argue that to determine if television media influences American foreign policy, it is necessary to analyze not only news content, but also administration policy decisions throughout a crisis.
      My analysis utilizes process tracing and content analysis over two issue areas: famine and genocide, testing three separate models---Indexing, the CNN Effect, and Mediated Policymaking---with each model predicting different patterns of agenda setting behavior. I draw upon a variety of primary sources to establish the news frames, pictorial images, and policies present during the crises, including news stories from the Vanderbilt Television News Archives, declassified government documents from the National Security Archive, and statements from the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents and Foreign Policy Bulletin.
      My findings indicate that television news did not influence policy in the four cases analyzed. Most crisis stories either aired simultaneously with administration policy decisions or shortly after decisions had been made, suggesting that television follows the government's lead during emerging humanitarian crises. Furthermore, when looking at the content of the media coverage, the trend is to support the administration's policy decisions, with instances of intervention garnering substantial airtime and positive portrayals of American efforts. In cases of non-intervention, minimal coverage to the crisis is given, and no effort is made to explain why the crisis is politically unimportant. Finally, while dramatic images of suffering do appear in coverage of all four cases, the dramatic impact of these compelling visuals is downplayed, when the verbal content of the stories is taken into account: story lines were devoted to issues other than the need for intervention. Given these results, I conclude that Indexing and Mediated Policymaking best describe the relationship between the media and policymakers.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼