RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Essays on the theory of auctions and economic rents.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10601012

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Transaction cost economics focuses on when firms should buy resources, whereas resource based view focuses on what resources firms should buy. This dissertation focuses on how firms should buy resources in factor markets to create competitive advantages.
      In the first chapter, I model resource acquisition by operationalizing pricing as an endogenous component of competitive strategy and compare negotiation, auction and posted price mechanisms. I identify 5 factors, which affect a firm's choice between each market mechanism. Using a hypothetical entrepreneurial firm, I model the sale of a unique resource (a patent), and argue that the question of "how a firm should buy/sell resources" is critical for our understanding of firm competitiveness.
      In the second chapter, I apply the model predictions of my first essay to market for firms, and study how an entrepreneurial firm should be sold. Using initial public offerings as auctions and mid-market mergers and acquisitions as negotiations, I examine the performance effects of the discrete choices entrepreneurial firms make when they sell their firm (e.g. a bundle of resources).
      In the third chapter, I study an application of the auction theory in practice and I investigate business-to-business online auctions and auctioneers, and their effects on firm competitiveness using an in depth analysis of intermediary firms and exchange rules by analyzing 4 online auctioneers.
      In my dissertation I focus on how firms should buy resources in factor markets to create competitive advantages. When competing in factor or product markets to acquire resources or sell goods, firms often have to make strategic decisions whether to use spot market transactions with posted prices, negotiation markets with bargaining, or auction markets with bidding. Given these three different market mechanisms, what are the firm and industry specific factors that determine different selling/buying devices to occur simultaneously in the market? By endogenizing pricing as a strategic variable, managers can choose among different market mechanisms in pursuit of rents. In this paper I model dynamic resource acquisition in equilibrium, simultaneously taking into account the characteristics of factor markets from both the sellers' and the buyers' perspectives. Auctions, negotiations and spot markets are compared given heterogeneity of expectations, bargaining power of the participants, market thickness, risk propensity and search costs.
      I further investigated the use of auctions in buying and selling resources in the context of business-to-business online marketplaces. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
      번역하기

      Transaction cost economics focuses on when firms should buy resources, whereas resource based view focuses on what resources firms should buy. This dissertation focuses on how firms should buy resources in factor markets to create competitive advanta...

      Transaction cost economics focuses on when firms should buy resources, whereas resource based view focuses on what resources firms should buy. This dissertation focuses on how firms should buy resources in factor markets to create competitive advantages.
      In the first chapter, I model resource acquisition by operationalizing pricing as an endogenous component of competitive strategy and compare negotiation, auction and posted price mechanisms. I identify 5 factors, which affect a firm's choice between each market mechanism. Using a hypothetical entrepreneurial firm, I model the sale of a unique resource (a patent), and argue that the question of "how a firm should buy/sell resources" is critical for our understanding of firm competitiveness.
      In the second chapter, I apply the model predictions of my first essay to market for firms, and study how an entrepreneurial firm should be sold. Using initial public offerings as auctions and mid-market mergers and acquisitions as negotiations, I examine the performance effects of the discrete choices entrepreneurial firms make when they sell their firm (e.g. a bundle of resources).
      In the third chapter, I study an application of the auction theory in practice and I investigate business-to-business online auctions and auctioneers, and their effects on firm competitiveness using an in depth analysis of intermediary firms and exchange rules by analyzing 4 online auctioneers.
      In my dissertation I focus on how firms should buy resources in factor markets to create competitive advantages. When competing in factor or product markets to acquire resources or sell goods, firms often have to make strategic decisions whether to use spot market transactions with posted prices, negotiation markets with bargaining, or auction markets with bidding. Given these three different market mechanisms, what are the firm and industry specific factors that determine different selling/buying devices to occur simultaneously in the market? By endogenizing pricing as a strategic variable, managers can choose among different market mechanisms in pursuit of rents. In this paper I model dynamic resource acquisition in equilibrium, simultaneously taking into account the characteristics of factor markets from both the sellers' and the buyers' perspectives. Auctions, negotiations and spot markets are compared given heterogeneity of expectations, bargaining power of the participants, market thickness, risk propensity and search costs.
      I further investigated the use of auctions in buying and selling resources in the context of business-to-business online marketplaces. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼