RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Developmentalism and its failings: Why rural development went wrong in 1960s and 1970s Tanzania.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10584070

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The central puzzle addressed by this study is the remarkable persistence of development agents, be they state officials or otherwise, in their pursuit of often ineffective or even harmful development policies. I contend that most existing approaches to explaining this phenomenon and concomitant developmental failures rely far too exclusively on a strategy of asserting that development policies ‘fail’ because they are typically usurped for unstated exploitative purposes. This study demonstrates that such an argument does not fit the Tanzanian record, suggesting also that the broader universe of cases might warrant a reexamination.
      The study's main empirical focus is the pillar of rural development policy in 1960s and 1970s Tanzania, the forced <italic>ujamaa</italic>/villagization program that culminated in the mid1970s and—according to official claims—resettled 70 per cent of Tanzania's rural population into ‘planned villages’. I seek to understand this policy and its problematic dimensions and failings as the product of what I call ‘developmentalism’. At the root of developmentalism lies state elites' strong sense of developmental mission and their unshakable conviction that in this mission they, as competent developers, confronted ‘backward’ rural masses. This study centers on an examination of these developmentalist imaginings and hierarchies.
      Developmentalism's most critical effect was that it apparently blinded Tanzanian developers to the fact that they often pushed initiatives with wholly inadequate forethought and preparation. As they read the rural populace as backward, ignorant, and in some instances indeed ‘savage’, riding roughshod over the often legitimate concerns of rural people—in the name of their development—seemed palatable to the interveners. I show through a series of micro-historical studies that coming to grips with developmentalism and its roots and effects is essential to an adequate understanding of the initiation and persistence of failing rural development policies in Tanzania. Through a close-up focus on agents and actions within their historical, social, and discursive matrices, this study seeks to produce an ethnography of the Tanzanian state in development.
      번역하기

      The central puzzle addressed by this study is the remarkable persistence of development agents, be they state officials or otherwise, in their pursuit of often ineffective or even harmful development policies. I contend that most existing approaches ...

      The central puzzle addressed by this study is the remarkable persistence of development agents, be they state officials or otherwise, in their pursuit of often ineffective or even harmful development policies. I contend that most existing approaches to explaining this phenomenon and concomitant developmental failures rely far too exclusively on a strategy of asserting that development policies ‘fail’ because they are typically usurped for unstated exploitative purposes. This study demonstrates that such an argument does not fit the Tanzanian record, suggesting also that the broader universe of cases might warrant a reexamination.
      The study's main empirical focus is the pillar of rural development policy in 1960s and 1970s Tanzania, the forced <italic>ujamaa</italic>/villagization program that culminated in the mid1970s and—according to official claims—resettled 70 per cent of Tanzania's rural population into ‘planned villages’. I seek to understand this policy and its problematic dimensions and failings as the product of what I call ‘developmentalism’. At the root of developmentalism lies state elites' strong sense of developmental mission and their unshakable conviction that in this mission they, as competent developers, confronted ‘backward’ rural masses. This study centers on an examination of these developmentalist imaginings and hierarchies.
      Developmentalism's most critical effect was that it apparently blinded Tanzanian developers to the fact that they often pushed initiatives with wholly inadequate forethought and preparation. As they read the rural populace as backward, ignorant, and in some instances indeed ‘savage’, riding roughshod over the often legitimate concerns of rural people—in the name of their development—seemed palatable to the interveners. I show through a series of micro-historical studies that coming to grips with developmentalism and its roots and effects is essential to an adequate understanding of the initiation and persistence of failing rural development policies in Tanzania. Through a close-up focus on agents and actions within their historical, social, and discursive matrices, this study seeks to produce an ethnography of the Tanzanian state in development.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼