RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      "A funny thing happened on the way to ratification": U.S. strategic nuclear arms control policy, 1963--2000.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10577212

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examines U.S. strategic nuclear arms control efforts from the early 1960s to 2000. It seeks to understand why this arms control process yielded only moderate results after some 40 years. The U.S. and Russia retain sizable nuclear forces despite the end of the superpower competition. These large strategic nuclear forces remain a matter of concern. The goal is to learn from these past efforts in order to assess the possibilities for further strategic nuclear arms reductions.
      The negotiations for the SALT I, SALT II, START I and START II treaties provide four historical cases studies to examine how consecutive domestic political windows of opportunity for strategic arms control have opened and closed. To analyze the political process, the significant factors that determine political outcomes in the U.S. political system are examined: the President, his administration, the Congress, the important federal bureaucracies, the public, and the media. Relevant international events are incorporated into this framework: Soviet actions, international crises, etc.
      A variety of sources-from historical archives, recently declassified documents and those released under the Freedom of Information Act, presidential papers, official histories, oral histories, memoirs, congressional hearings and reports, contemporary media accounts, specialist publications, interviews, and important secondary scholarship—are used to investigate the cases.
      Most analyses of strategic nuclear arms control were completed during the Cold War. Few were done in the 1990s and none have examined the four treaty cases. One conclusion is that previous analyses underestimated the difficulties of advancing any major piece of public policy, including arms control, in the face of the crowded political agenda. The problems strategic nuclear arms control have faced are not intrinsic to it per se, but result from many outside circumstances or political opponents' deliberate interference. No easy public policy solution exists to these problems. Students of the president's domestic political agenda have noted, however, the likelihood of the success of any major policy initiative is greater if it is launched earlier in a presidential administration and pursued consistently without too much competition from other initiatives. The same applies for strategic nuclear arms control.
      번역하기

      This study examines U.S. strategic nuclear arms control efforts from the early 1960s to 2000. It seeks to understand why this arms control process yielded only moderate results after some 40 years. The U.S. and Russia retain sizable nuclear forces de...

      This study examines U.S. strategic nuclear arms control efforts from the early 1960s to 2000. It seeks to understand why this arms control process yielded only moderate results after some 40 years. The U.S. and Russia retain sizable nuclear forces despite the end of the superpower competition. These large strategic nuclear forces remain a matter of concern. The goal is to learn from these past efforts in order to assess the possibilities for further strategic nuclear arms reductions.
      The negotiations for the SALT I, SALT II, START I and START II treaties provide four historical cases studies to examine how consecutive domestic political windows of opportunity for strategic arms control have opened and closed. To analyze the political process, the significant factors that determine political outcomes in the U.S. political system are examined: the President, his administration, the Congress, the important federal bureaucracies, the public, and the media. Relevant international events are incorporated into this framework: Soviet actions, international crises, etc.
      A variety of sources-from historical archives, recently declassified documents and those released under the Freedom of Information Act, presidential papers, official histories, oral histories, memoirs, congressional hearings and reports, contemporary media accounts, specialist publications, interviews, and important secondary scholarship—are used to investigate the cases.
      Most analyses of strategic nuclear arms control were completed during the Cold War. Few were done in the 1990s and none have examined the four treaty cases. One conclusion is that previous analyses underestimated the difficulties of advancing any major piece of public policy, including arms control, in the face of the crowded political agenda. The problems strategic nuclear arms control have faced are not intrinsic to it per se, but result from many outside circumstances or political opponents' deliberate interference. No easy public policy solution exists to these problems. Students of the president's domestic political agenda have noted, however, the likelihood of the success of any major policy initiative is greater if it is launched earlier in a presidential administration and pursued consistently without too much competition from other initiatives. The same applies for strategic nuclear arms control.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼