RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Words without swords: International institutions and crisis diplomacy.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10549032

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      International institutions shape world politics through domestic framing effects. In other words, international rules and customs influence how political actors define and explain foreign issues for domestic audiences and, in turn, this domestic framing shapes subsequent foreign policy and international outcomes. For example, international institutions influence whether great power concerts succeed. Great power concerts involve the world's strongest countries jointly managing threats to international security. A particularly difficult challenge for great power concerts arises when one member attacks an important client of another, provoking a spin-off crisis between members. While concerts usually fail to peacefully resolve such disputes, sometimes they succeed. This study helps understand why. Sometimes the explicit and customary rules of a great power concert provide leaders the grounds for publicly protesting their rival's actions without committing themselves to a particular response. When this occurs, leaders use concert principles such as prior consultation to frame the foreign threat for domestic audiences. This type of public protest helps leaders legitimize in advance a broader range of potential crisis policies, thereby helping them better position themselves relative to possible domestic opponents. In this way, concert-based frames enable leaders to pursue the nuanced diplomacy needed to peacefully resolve these complex disputes.
      The record of great power concerts over the last two centuries comports with the theory. So far no war between great powers has arisen out of a dispute covered by a prior consultation obligation embedded in great power agreements and customs, even though such institutions have covered some challenging issues. Indeed, focused comparison shows great power concert success with these rules, in a spinoff dispute otherwise more severe than one that ended in great power war. Process tracing with historical methods and materials shows that the domestic framing effects of concert rules can play a decisive role in spin-off disputes.
      International institutions in general have more robust and varied effects than we had previously thought. Even with weak rules in dangerous disputes between strong countries, international institutions can have decisive effects on world politics by helping political actors in their domestic legitimation struggles.
      번역하기

      International institutions shape world politics through domestic framing effects. In other words, international rules and customs influence how political actors define and explain foreign issues for domestic audiences and, in turn, this domestic fram...

      International institutions shape world politics through domestic framing effects. In other words, international rules and customs influence how political actors define and explain foreign issues for domestic audiences and, in turn, this domestic framing shapes subsequent foreign policy and international outcomes. For example, international institutions influence whether great power concerts succeed. Great power concerts involve the world's strongest countries jointly managing threats to international security. A particularly difficult challenge for great power concerts arises when one member attacks an important client of another, provoking a spin-off crisis between members. While concerts usually fail to peacefully resolve such disputes, sometimes they succeed. This study helps understand why. Sometimes the explicit and customary rules of a great power concert provide leaders the grounds for publicly protesting their rival's actions without committing themselves to a particular response. When this occurs, leaders use concert principles such as prior consultation to frame the foreign threat for domestic audiences. This type of public protest helps leaders legitimize in advance a broader range of potential crisis policies, thereby helping them better position themselves relative to possible domestic opponents. In this way, concert-based frames enable leaders to pursue the nuanced diplomacy needed to peacefully resolve these complex disputes.
      The record of great power concerts over the last two centuries comports with the theory. So far no war between great powers has arisen out of a dispute covered by a prior consultation obligation embedded in great power agreements and customs, even though such institutions have covered some challenging issues. Indeed, focused comparison shows great power concert success with these rules, in a spinoff dispute otherwise more severe than one that ended in great power war. Process tracing with historical methods and materials shows that the domestic framing effects of concert rules can play a decisive role in spin-off disputes.
      International institutions in general have more robust and varied effects than we had previously thought. Even with weak rules in dangerous disputes between strong countries, international institutions can have decisive effects on world politics by helping political actors in their domestic legitimation struggles.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼