RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Between Ukrainian cinema and modernism: Alexander Dovzhenko's silent trilogy.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10546282

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Along with Dziga Vertov, Sergei Eisenstein and Vsevolod Pudovkin, Alexander Dovzhenko is regarded as one of Soviet cinema's golden or heroic age masters. Through the silent cinema's early aspirations and aesthetic's converging ground, this work looks at Dovzhenko's Soviet Ukrainian trilogy (<italic>Zvenyhora., Arsenal, Earth</italic>, 1928–1930).
      More than a few critics have labelled these films at the height of Dovzhenko's directorial career and at the silent cinema aesthetic's apogee. In theme and subject matter, the three masterpieces, <italic>Zvenyhora, Arsenal</italic> and <italic>Earth</italic> present Ukrainian cinema's birth. Historically, the films are foundational in speaking about Ukrainian culture, collectivization and struggles for social revolution and national emancipation.
      Contextualizing Alexander Dovzhenko's silent trilogy, this examination focuses on a more often quoted than known film trilogy through lenses of lesser known buried histories: Ukrainian Modernism, the early twentieth century Ukrainian literary and fine art debates, Neo-Classicists, peasant writers (Pluh), Futurism, the politico-literary organization VAPLITE, Berezil Theatre, the Ukrainian struggle's historical background and importance of Ukraine's poet laureate, Taras Shevchenko, ‘Ukrainian’ literature and aesthetics, the 1917–21 Ukrainian Revolution, Borotbyst Party, Skovoroda, Byzantine iconology, Eastern European philosophy and modernist aesthetics.
      Redressing idealization regarding the Soviet heroic film period's utopian Marxism and ‘Union’ ideology from the context of a former Soviet republic and the silencing of that country's histories, this study presents a textual analysis of the silent trilogy in wider parameters of the Ukrainian Cultural Renaissance (1917–31).
      This work places itself in liminal territories in recent heterodox disciplinary sets (i.e. Cinema Studies (visual cultural studies), Slavic Studies (Ukrainian Studies), Art History (Byzantine iconology/other's modernisms). It excavates misaligned fault lines to critique historic Soviet film paradigms. It conducts syncretic micrologic examination and takes a step into the less-trodden territories of silenced histories and what exist now as a grouping of little understood nations.
      번역하기

      Along with Dziga Vertov, Sergei Eisenstein and Vsevolod Pudovkin, Alexander Dovzhenko is regarded as one of Soviet cinema's golden or heroic age masters. Through the silent cinema's early aspirations and aesthetic's converging ground, this work looks...

      Along with Dziga Vertov, Sergei Eisenstein and Vsevolod Pudovkin, Alexander Dovzhenko is regarded as one of Soviet cinema's golden or heroic age masters. Through the silent cinema's early aspirations and aesthetic's converging ground, this work looks at Dovzhenko's Soviet Ukrainian trilogy (<italic>Zvenyhora., Arsenal, Earth</italic>, 1928–1930).
      More than a few critics have labelled these films at the height of Dovzhenko's directorial career and at the silent cinema aesthetic's apogee. In theme and subject matter, the three masterpieces, <italic>Zvenyhora, Arsenal</italic> and <italic>Earth</italic> present Ukrainian cinema's birth. Historically, the films are foundational in speaking about Ukrainian culture, collectivization and struggles for social revolution and national emancipation.
      Contextualizing Alexander Dovzhenko's silent trilogy, this examination focuses on a more often quoted than known film trilogy through lenses of lesser known buried histories: Ukrainian Modernism, the early twentieth century Ukrainian literary and fine art debates, Neo-Classicists, peasant writers (Pluh), Futurism, the politico-literary organization VAPLITE, Berezil Theatre, the Ukrainian struggle's historical background and importance of Ukraine's poet laureate, Taras Shevchenko, ‘Ukrainian’ literature and aesthetics, the 1917–21 Ukrainian Revolution, Borotbyst Party, Skovoroda, Byzantine iconology, Eastern European philosophy and modernist aesthetics.
      Redressing idealization regarding the Soviet heroic film period's utopian Marxism and ‘Union’ ideology from the context of a former Soviet republic and the silencing of that country's histories, this study presents a textual analysis of the silent trilogy in wider parameters of the Ukrainian Cultural Renaissance (1917–31).
      This work places itself in liminal territories in recent heterodox disciplinary sets (i.e. Cinema Studies (visual cultural studies), Slavic Studies (Ukrainian Studies), Art History (Byzantine iconology/other's modernisms). It excavates misaligned fault lines to critique historic Soviet film paradigms. It conducts syncretic micrologic examination and takes a step into the less-trodden territories of silenced histories and what exist now as a grouping of little understood nations.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼