『열녀함양박씨전(烈女咸陽朴氏傳)』의 구조와 글쓰기 방식 = The Structure and The Way of writing of 「Yeleohamyangparksigeon(烈女咸陽朴氏傳)」

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is to reveal the structure and the sense of subject in 「Yel- eohamyangparksigeon」in terms of contexts and a way of writing of Yeon Am. Considering the point that the main reason of argument in inter- preting the writing comes from a unique form and a style of talking, this study approaches the writing with attention to Yeon Am`s way of writing. First of all, it looks into a structure of the writing. It makes the background of his writing inference from the title of writing found in the manuscript of Yeon Min Publication. The types of three widows are all typical possible cases which at that time of Chosun Dynasty all the others could experience. Yeon Am criticized the activity of excessive virtuous woman remained faithful to the deceased husband and stood by the lustful desire. He looked at the widow of remaining faithful to her deceased husband and Mrs. Park died in defense of her chastity, with an eye of pity. This issue is approached to be considered in a traditional writing of that time and Yeon Am`s writing style. The critical mind of 「Yeleo- hamyangparksigeon」looks serious, but not dangerous, because of the way of talking. Yeon Am talked with a lovely, warm heart, at the same time, he criticized the society. In his critics, a narrator talks to the direction from inner to external, in this writing of 「Yeleohamyangparksigeon」. He destines to inner, himself. This study finds the attitude of Yeon Am toward human. He has the attitude of warm heart to isolated human, even of weak points, but he has the attitude of critical mind to social structure and system of pressing human. The widow personally is a scapegoat in a society, in a social structure she is a prototype of excessive faithful woman died in defense of her chastity. Yeon Am made efforts to be a position of woman, not man, with full compassion to her. His talks and critics are toward the social reality leading her to the death. Most of noblemen criticized this book as a mere story of one woman overcoming her lustful desire, but Yeon Am`s real critical point is on the social reality which made human painful and dead. For Yeon Am, the key way is not only about the subject of argument itself, but also the way of making understand and persuading the world. In a mood of society where the activity of the widow remaining faithful to her deceased husband is a virtue, the direct dispute about it is no practical use. The effective way for him is to approach with tender, flexible mind and draw common understanding and agreement in a reasonable way. These kinds of background are found in 「Yeleohamyangparksigeon」which looks unclear and contradictory.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김일근, "烈女咸陽朴氏傳과 朴氏의 旌閭記攷" 건국대국문학연구회 11 : 1987

2 이우성, "한국의 역사상" 창작과비평사 1982

3 박일용, "조선후기 傳과 小說을 통해서 본 事實과 虛構, 그리고 소설적 眞實" 한국중국소설학회 13 : 2001

4 김혈조, "열하일기 1-3" 돌베개 2009

5 강명관, "열녀의 탄생" 돌베게 2009

6 박지원, "연암집 상․중․하" 돌베개 2007

7 "연암제각기"

8 이가원, "연암소설연구" 을유문화사 1965

9 "연암산방집"

10 단국대 동양학연구원, "연민문고 소장 연암 박지원 작품 필사본 총서 9-14" 문예원 2012

11 "담총외기"

12 김혈조, "燕巖의 『烈女咸陽朴氏傳』再考 -새로운 자료 소개를 겸하여-" 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회) (24) : 339-374, 2006

13 신향림, "烈女傳의 사회적 역할과 박지원의 烈女咸陽朴氏傳" 고려대 한자한문연구소 4 : 2008

14 李植, "澤堂集" 민족문화추진위원회

15 강명관, "『열녀함양박씨전』 재론" 동양한문학회 32 (32): 5-24, 2011

16 이월영, "<烈女咸陽朴氏傳> 硏究 -문학적 전략을 중심으로-" 한국고전여성문학회 (24) : 159-187, 2012

17 박기석, "<烈女咸陽朴氏傳> 硏究" 한국어교육학회 (111) : 13-366, 2003

18 박수밀, "<호질>의 원작자, 맥락으로 다시 읽기" 한국고전문학교육학회 (23) : 235-266, 2012

19 서은아, "<열녀함양박씨전>의 박씨와 『삼강행실도: 열녀편』의 관계를 통해 본 열녀제작의 심리적 요인" 한국고전문학교육학회 (16) : 273-296, 2008

20 김수중, "<열녀함양박씨전>에 나타난 정절의식 분석" 한국언어문학회 (76) : 63-83, 2011

21 최지녀, "<열녀 함양박씨전>(烈女咸陽朴氏傳) 연구" 국문학회 16 (16): 165-186, 2007