RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    이어도 및 해양과학기지의 법적 지위 = A study on the legal Regime of Ieodo and Marine Scientific Research Station

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99704635

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study has primarily focused on the Maritime Jurisdiction Regime of Korea and China with reference to Ieodo issue including the legal status of Marine Scientific Research Station. Ieodo is a submerged rock located 82 nautical miles south to the Marado island, the southern most korean territory. Traditionally Ieodo has been an special concern to korean people, as the rock had been told as an utopia to fishermen wrecked in a storm. The fact that Ieodo is really present was ascertained in 1900 when a british ship called Socotra found the rock. Ieodo is not an island which could has territorial sea, EEZ, and continental shelf around itself. According to the LOS Convention, Ieodo is neither a rock nor a low-tide elevation. It is only a submerged rock which any country could not claim sovereignty and establish maritime zones. What is certain is that the underwater rock is within Korea`s maritime jurisdiction. South Korea established a multi-purpose comprehensive Marine Scientific Research Station(installation) over the Ieodo in 2003. That installation could provide many kinds of useful informations on the ocean and weather forecasting, maritime traffic safety and disaster prevention by monitoring the marine conditions in real time. Regarding to the building of that Marine Scientific Research Station of Ieodo, China has contested that the location of the station is in the disputed area between Korea and China. The East China Sea resource controversy is one of the most contentious elements of international conflicts in maritime boundaries. Geographically, this semi-enclosed sea is surrounded by the continents including Korea, China, and Japan with irregular coasts and islands of all possible sizes, locations, and economic utilities. China claimed that East China Sea continental shelf is a single continental shelf as a whole which is originated from main land of China. China stressed the geographical characteristics of the continental shelf of the East China Sea should be considered as a relevant circumstance in maritime delimitation. And China claimed that delimitation of continental shelf in the East China Sea should be settled by consultation between the parties on the basis of the theory of natural prolongation of land territory. Regarding to the delimitation of continental shelf in the East China Sea, Korea has suggested the median line as a general rule on the legal basis of the delimitation of continental shelf and rejected China`s natural prolongation principle. Although some chinese NGOs have raised territorial claim over Ieodo, Chinese Government has never raised such claim over this tiny submerged rock. Given the fact that Ieodo is not entitled to maritime jurisdiction such as territorial sea, EEZ, and continental shelf, china`s protest against Korea`s maritime jurisdiction over Ieodo and its surrounding area seems to be related to the natural resources which may be found in the future. Which means that it is not a simple problem for Korea to neglect never. Besides keeping an eye on the maritime jurisdiction relating to exploitation and exploration of natural resources, the sensitiveness of location of Ieodo and Marine Scientific Research Station should not be ignored. For Ieodo is situated in a strategic point to watch Chinese navy`s deployment into the Pacific Ocean, it can play an essential role in China`s military acts and traffic routes over the countries along the Pacific Oceans costal. Many countries including China will give various their own opinions and interpretations about the new regime of law of the sea in the way that will do good for each country to ensure and strengthen their rights of the sea and these will remain a precedent effecting in the related fields in the future. Therefore, Korea should not only regard Ieodo just as a submerged rock, rather, need to make an effort to secure, rule and exercise maritime jurisdiction over Ieodo and it`s surrounding area on legal and realistic aspects, continually.
    번역하기

    This study has primarily focused on the Maritime Jurisdiction Regime of Korea and China with reference to Ieodo issue including the legal status of Marine Scientific Research Station. Ieodo is a submerged rock located 82 nautical miles south to the Ma...

    This study has primarily focused on the Maritime Jurisdiction Regime of Korea and China with reference to Ieodo issue including the legal status of Marine Scientific Research Station. Ieodo is a submerged rock located 82 nautical miles south to the Marado island, the southern most korean territory. Traditionally Ieodo has been an special concern to korean people, as the rock had been told as an utopia to fishermen wrecked in a storm. The fact that Ieodo is really present was ascertained in 1900 when a british ship called Socotra found the rock. Ieodo is not an island which could has territorial sea, EEZ, and continental shelf around itself. According to the LOS Convention, Ieodo is neither a rock nor a low-tide elevation. It is only a submerged rock which any country could not claim sovereignty and establish maritime zones. What is certain is that the underwater rock is within Korea`s maritime jurisdiction. South Korea established a multi-purpose comprehensive Marine Scientific Research Station(installation) over the Ieodo in 2003. That installation could provide many kinds of useful informations on the ocean and weather forecasting, maritime traffic safety and disaster prevention by monitoring the marine conditions in real time. Regarding to the building of that Marine Scientific Research Station of Ieodo, China has contested that the location of the station is in the disputed area between Korea and China. The East China Sea resource controversy is one of the most contentious elements of international conflicts in maritime boundaries. Geographically, this semi-enclosed sea is surrounded by the continents including Korea, China, and Japan with irregular coasts and islands of all possible sizes, locations, and economic utilities. China claimed that East China Sea continental shelf is a single continental shelf as a whole which is originated from main land of China. China stressed the geographical characteristics of the continental shelf of the East China Sea should be considered as a relevant circumstance in maritime delimitation. And China claimed that delimitation of continental shelf in the East China Sea should be settled by consultation between the parties on the basis of the theory of natural prolongation of land territory. Regarding to the delimitation of continental shelf in the East China Sea, Korea has suggested the median line as a general rule on the legal basis of the delimitation of continental shelf and rejected China`s natural prolongation principle. Although some chinese NGOs have raised territorial claim over Ieodo, Chinese Government has never raised such claim over this tiny submerged rock. Given the fact that Ieodo is not entitled to maritime jurisdiction such as territorial sea, EEZ, and continental shelf, china`s protest against Korea`s maritime jurisdiction over Ieodo and its surrounding area seems to be related to the natural resources which may be found in the future. Which means that it is not a simple problem for Korea to neglect never. Besides keeping an eye on the maritime jurisdiction relating to exploitation and exploration of natural resources, the sensitiveness of location of Ieodo and Marine Scientific Research Station should not be ignored. For Ieodo is situated in a strategic point to watch Chinese navy`s deployment into the Pacific Ocean, it can play an essential role in China`s military acts and traffic routes over the countries along the Pacific Oceans costal. Many countries including China will give various their own opinions and interpretations about the new regime of law of the sea in the way that will do good for each country to ensure and strengthen their rights of the sea and these will remain a precedent effecting in the related fields in the future. Therefore, Korea should not only regard Ieodo just as a submerged rock, rather, need to make an effort to secure, rule and exercise maritime jurisdiction over Ieodo and it`s surrounding area on legal and realistic aspects, continually.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김병렬, "이어도를 아십니까" 홍일문화 1997

    2 김부찬, "이어도 및 이어도 주변수역의 해양법적 지위" 2007

    3 박찬호, "유엔해양법협약 해설서 1" 지인북스 2009

    4 이석용, "우리나라와 중국간 해양경계획정" 대한국제법학회 52 (52): 259-284, 2007

    5 이석용, "국제해양분쟁해결" 한남대학교출판부 <글누리> 2007

    6 University of Virginia Center for Oceans Law and Policy, "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 : A Commentary" 1993-, 1993

    7 Van Dyke, J. M., "Uninhabited Islands : Their Impact on the Ownership of the Ocean's Resources" 12 : 1983

    8 Antunes, Nuno Marques, "Towards the Conceptualization of Maritime Delimitation : Legal and Technical Aspects of a Political Process" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2003

    9 Oxman, Bernard B., "The Territorial Temptation : A Siren Song at Sea" 100 : 2006

    10 Mcdorman, Ted, "The Role of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf : A Technical Body in a Political World" 16 : 2002

    1 김병렬, "이어도를 아십니까" 홍일문화 1997

    2 김부찬, "이어도 및 이어도 주변수역의 해양법적 지위" 2007

    3 박찬호, "유엔해양법협약 해설서 1" 지인북스 2009

    4 이석용, "우리나라와 중국간 해양경계획정" 대한국제법학회 52 (52): 259-284, 2007

    5 이석용, "국제해양분쟁해결" 한남대학교출판부 <글누리> 2007

    6 University of Virginia Center for Oceans Law and Policy, "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 : A Commentary" 1993-, 1993

    7 Van Dyke, J. M., "Uninhabited Islands : Their Impact on the Ownership of the Ocean's Resources" 12 : 1983

    8 Antunes, Nuno Marques, "Towards the Conceptualization of Maritime Delimitation : Legal and Technical Aspects of a Political Process" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2003

    9 Oxman, Bernard B., "The Territorial Temptation : A Siren Song at Sea" 100 : 2006

    10 Mcdorman, Ted, "The Role of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf : A Technical Body in a Political World" 16 : 2002

    11 Jayewardene, Hiran W., "The Regime of Islands in International Law" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 3-4, 1990

    12 Kwiatkowska, Barbara, "The Qatar v. Bahrain Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions Case" 33 :

    13 Rosenne, S, "The Qatar v. Bahrain Case : What is the Treaty? A Framework Agreement and the Seising of the Court" 8 : 1995

    14 C. R. Symmons, "The Maritime Zones of Islands in International Law" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers Co. 23-, 1979

    15 Bowett, D. W., "The Legal Regime of Islands in International Law" Oceana Publications Inc 1979

    16 Clingan, Thomas A., "The Law of the Sea : Ocean Law and Policy" Austin & Winfield 1994

    17 Churchill, R. R., "The Law of the Sea" Manchester University Press 1999

    18 Kwiatkowska, Barbara, "The Landmark 2006 UNCLOS Annex Ⅶ Barbados/ Trinidad and Tobago Maritime Delimitation Award" 39 : 2008

    19 Brown, E. D., "The International Law of the Sea" Dartmouth Publishing Co 1994

    20 Nordquist, M. H., "Security Flashpoints" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1998

    21 Charney, Jonathan, "Rocks that cannot Sustain Human Habitation" 93 : 1999

    22 Parson, Lindsay, "Non-living and Living Resources of the Seafloor beyond 200 Nautical Miles and Their Significance for Application of Article 82 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea" 2009

    23 Caminos Hugo, "Law of the Sea" Ashgate 2001

    24 Rothwell, Donald R., "Issues and Strategies for Outer Continental Shelf Claims" 23 : 2008

    25 R. D. Hodgson, "Islands : Normal and Special Circumstances, In The Law of the Sea : The Emerging Regime of the Oceans" Ballinger Publishing Co. 1973

    26 Shaw, Malcolm N., "International Law" Cambridge 1997

    27 Sohn, Louis B., "Cases and Materials on the Law of the Sea" Transnational Publishers 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2007-05-09 학회명변경 한글명 : 과학기술법연구소 -> 과학기술법연구원
    영문명 : Institute for Law of science & Technology -> Institute for Law of Science & Technology
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.51 0.51 0.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.48 0.42 0.66 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼