RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

    발생액의 질과 재무분석가의 정보 환경이 이익예측 정확도에 미치는 영향 = The effect of accrual quality and analysts` information environments on analysts` forecast accuracy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A95939139

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines how accruals quality and individual analysts` information environments affect on the accuracy of analysts` earnings forecasts. Barron et al.(1998) reveal about the properties of analysts` information environments, developing BKLS consensus, which is the measure of information commonality individual analysts possess at the time they announce earnings forecasts. BKLS consensus assumes analysts` information can be represented as either common to all analysts or idiosyncratic to some individual analysts. Thus, by using BKLS consensus, we can measure the degree to which analysts base their forecasts on common information relative to idiosyncratic information. Francis et al.(2005) suggest that accruals quality is a proxy for the information risk associated with earnings because this measure tells investors about the mapping of accrual-based accounting earnings into cash flows. Relatively poor accruals quality weakens this mapping and, therefore, increases information risk. First, we investigate whether accruals quality is associated with BKLS consensus, the ratio of common-to-total information in the average analysts` forecasts. Second, we examine whether analysts` behavior to change the degree of information commonality depending on accruals quality contributes to improve the accuracy of earnings forecasts. We find that higher accruals quality decreases BKLS consensus, which shows lower information risk decreases investors` demands on common information which is publicly available to all investors. Accordingly, such investors` demands enable analysts to generate more idiosyncratic information rather than common information. Our results are consistent with Indjeijikian(1991), which find that higher level of disclosures afford analysts more opportunity to develop and convey more uniquely private information in their individual forecasts. Further, we provide evidence that the accuracy of analysts` earnings forecasts decreases as BKLS consensus increases, which suggests that high ratio of common-to-total information in the average analysts` forecasts decreases analysts` earnings forecast accuracy. However, the increased reliance on common information as for firms with high accruals quality contributes to increase analysts` earnings forecast accuracy. Therefore, these findings suggest that, as for firms with high accruals quality, analysts do not have to spend their time and economic resources to acquire or develop idiosyncratic information because using common information is helpful to increase earings forecast accuracy. In sum, while analysts tend to place more reliance on idiosyncratic information rather than common information as for firms with high accruals quality, we find that their efforts on generating idiosyncratic information do not contribute to increase the accuracy of earnings forecasts. Our study suggests that it is cost effective for analysts to evaluate firms` accruals quality before they work harder to exploit more idiosyncratic information to increase the accuracy of earnings forecasts. Our results are consistent with Lobo et al.(2006) which find that low accruals quality are followed by a great number of analysts in response to greater demand on analyst services and more effort by analysts when firms have high information risk. Prior studies find that corporate disclosures are important source for analysts in forming their earnings forecasts. Byard and Shaw(2002) find that analysts rely more heavily on publicly available financial data rather than privileged communication with management. Evidence on how analysts use accounting information is still one of the main issues among those interested in understanding analysts` role as information intermediaries. Our study contributes to better understand how analysts react to market participants by analyzing that earnings forecast accuracy differs according to not only information environments but also its interaction effect with the quality of accounting information.
    번역하기

    This study examines how accruals quality and individual analysts` information environments affect on the accuracy of analysts` earnings forecasts. Barron et al.(1998) reveal about the properties of analysts` information environments, developing BKLS c...

    This study examines how accruals quality and individual analysts` information environments affect on the accuracy of analysts` earnings forecasts. Barron et al.(1998) reveal about the properties of analysts` information environments, developing BKLS consensus, which is the measure of information commonality individual analysts possess at the time they announce earnings forecasts. BKLS consensus assumes analysts` information can be represented as either common to all analysts or idiosyncratic to some individual analysts. Thus, by using BKLS consensus, we can measure the degree to which analysts base their forecasts on common information relative to idiosyncratic information. Francis et al.(2005) suggest that accruals quality is a proxy for the information risk associated with earnings because this measure tells investors about the mapping of accrual-based accounting earnings into cash flows. Relatively poor accruals quality weakens this mapping and, therefore, increases information risk. First, we investigate whether accruals quality is associated with BKLS consensus, the ratio of common-to-total information in the average analysts` forecasts. Second, we examine whether analysts` behavior to change the degree of information commonality depending on accruals quality contributes to improve the accuracy of earnings forecasts. We find that higher accruals quality decreases BKLS consensus, which shows lower information risk decreases investors` demands on common information which is publicly available to all investors. Accordingly, such investors` demands enable analysts to generate more idiosyncratic information rather than common information. Our results are consistent with Indjeijikian(1991), which find that higher level of disclosures afford analysts more opportunity to develop and convey more uniquely private information in their individual forecasts. Further, we provide evidence that the accuracy of analysts` earnings forecasts decreases as BKLS consensus increases, which suggests that high ratio of common-to-total information in the average analysts` forecasts decreases analysts` earnings forecast accuracy. However, the increased reliance on common information as for firms with high accruals quality contributes to increase analysts` earnings forecast accuracy. Therefore, these findings suggest that, as for firms with high accruals quality, analysts do not have to spend their time and economic resources to acquire or develop idiosyncratic information because using common information is helpful to increase earings forecast accuracy. In sum, while analysts tend to place more reliance on idiosyncratic information rather than common information as for firms with high accruals quality, we find that their efforts on generating idiosyncratic information do not contribute to increase the accuracy of earnings forecasts. Our study suggests that it is cost effective for analysts to evaluate firms` accruals quality before they work harder to exploit more idiosyncratic information to increase the accuracy of earnings forecasts. Our results are consistent with Lobo et al.(2006) which find that low accruals quality are followed by a great number of analysts in response to greater demand on analyst services and more effort by analysts when firms have high information risk. Prior studies find that corporate disclosures are important source for analysts in forming their earnings forecasts. Byard and Shaw(2002) find that analysts rely more heavily on publicly available financial data rather than privileged communication with management. Evidence on how analysts use accounting information is still one of the main issues among those interested in understanding analysts` role as information intermediaries. Our study contributes to better understand how analysts react to market participants by analyzing that earnings forecast accuracy differs according to not only information environments but also its interaction effect with the quality of accounting information.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최관, "현금전환가능성에 따른 발생액의 질과 시장이상현상" 한국회계학회 32 (32): 1-26, 2007

    2 안윤영, "재무분석가의 특성이 이익예측정확성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 1-23, 2006

    3 정석우, "재무분석가의 분석기업 결정과 예측특성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 61-84, 2003

    4 김지홍, "재무분석가수의 결정요인: IBES를 이용한 분석" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 31-54, 2003

    5 나종길, "유동발생의 예측오차와 감사인 유형에 따른 재량적 발생의 정보성 차이" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 117-142, 2004

    6 안윤영, "외국인투자자와 정보비대칭 간의 관계" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 109-131, 2005

    7 문상혁, "기업지배구조의 특성과 유동발생의 예측오차" 한국산업경영학회 21 (21): 217-257, 2006

    8 오원정, "공정공시제도의 시행효과 및 공정공시제도를 통한 정보 제공 여부와 관련된 기업특성에 관한 연구" 한국경영학회 35 (35): 1449-1478, 2006

    9 조중석, "경영자의 기회주의적 재량권이 재무분석가의 이익예측에 미치는 영향" 대한회계학회 14 (14): 147-173, 2009

    10 Amir, E, "What value analysts?" London Business School 2000

    1 최관, "현금전환가능성에 따른 발생액의 질과 시장이상현상" 한국회계학회 32 (32): 1-26, 2007

    2 안윤영, "재무분석가의 특성이 이익예측정확성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 1-23, 2006

    3 정석우, "재무분석가의 분석기업 결정과 예측특성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 61-84, 2003

    4 김지홍, "재무분석가수의 결정요인: IBES를 이용한 분석" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 31-54, 2003

    5 나종길, "유동발생의 예측오차와 감사인 유형에 따른 재량적 발생의 정보성 차이" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 117-142, 2004

    6 안윤영, "외국인투자자와 정보비대칭 간의 관계" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 109-131, 2005

    7 문상혁, "기업지배구조의 특성과 유동발생의 예측오차" 한국산업경영학회 21 (21): 217-257, 2006

    8 오원정, "공정공시제도의 시행효과 및 공정공시제도를 통한 정보 제공 여부와 관련된 기업특성에 관한 연구" 한국경영학회 35 (35): 1449-1478, 2006

    9 조중석, "경영자의 기회주의적 재량권이 재무분석가의 이익예측에 미치는 영향" 대한회계학회 14 (14): 147-173, 2009

    10 Amir, E, "What value analysts?" London Business School 2000

    11 Leone, A, "What does it take to become a superstar? Evidence from institutional investor rankings of financial analysts" Penn State University 2007

    12 Barron, O, "Using analysts’ forecasts to measure properties of analysts’ information environment" 73 (73): 421-433, 1998

    13 Botosan, C, "The role of information precision in determining the cost of equity capital" 9 : 233-259, 2004

    14 Imhoff, E, "The relation between perceived accounting quality and economic characteristics of firm" 11 (11): 97-118, 1992

    15 Ahn, Y, "The relation between analyst activity and earnings quality and its impact on the firm value" 19 (19): 933-959, 2006

    16 Dechow, P. M, "The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors" 77 (77): 35-59, 2002

    17 Subramanyam, K. R, "The pricing of abnormal accruals" 22 : 249-281, 1996

    18 Indjejikian, R, "The impact of costly information interpretation on firm disclosure decisions" 29 (29): 277-301, 1991

    19 Ahn, Y, "The impact of R&D expenditures on financial analysts’ forecast accuracy and forecast demands" 30 (30): 1-23, 2005

    20 Fang, L, "The effectiveness of reputation as a disciplinary mechanism in sell-side research" 22 (22): 3735-3777, 2009

    21 Ke, B, "The effect of issuing biased earnings forecasts on analysts’ access to management and survival" 44 (44): 965-999, 2006

    22 Holthausen, R. W, "The effect of informedness and consensus on price and volume behavior" 65 (65): 191-208, 1990

    23 Jeong, S. W, "The effect of earnings persistence on analysts’ forecast error and accuracy" 30 (30): 209-235, 2005

    24 Ahn, Y, "The determinants of analyst reputation, the relations between analyst reputation and performance: An analysis of best-analyst" 81-107, 2005

    25 Basu, S, "The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings" 24 (24): 3-38, 1997

    26 Barfield, R, "The accuracy of analysts’ forecasts of earnings per share" 3 : 241-252, 1975

    27 McNichols, M, "Self-selection and analyst coverage" 35 : 167-199, 1997

    28 Elton, E, "Professional expectations: Accuracy and diagnosis of errors" 19 (19): 351-363, 1984

    29 Atiase, R, "Pre-disclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around financial report releases" 23 (23): 21-36, 1985

    30 Kim, O, "Pre-announcement and event-period private information" 24 (24): 396-419, 1997

    31 Watts, R, "Positive Accounting Theory, Englewood Cliffs" Prentice-Hall 1986

    32 Kim, O, "Market liquidity and volume around earnings announcement" 17 (17): 41-67, 1994

    33 Hur, S. K, "IPO, earnings accuracy and determinants of estimation error" 12 (12): 1-26, 1991

    34 Mohanram, P, "How has regulation FD affected the operations of financial analysts?" 23 (23): 491-525, 2006

    35 송민섭, "How Do Quarterly Earnings Announcements Affect Analyst Forecasts?" 한국경영학회 37 (37): 1425-1460, 2008

    36 Lee, Y. W, "Firms’ characteristics and financial analysts’ earnings forecast accuracy" 17 (17): 89-108, 1993

    37 Bhushan, R, "Firm characteristics and analyst following" 11 (11): 255-274, 1989

    38 Waymire, G, "Earnings volatility and voluntary management forecast disclosure" 23 (23): 268-269, 1985

    39 Barron, O, "Earnings surprises that motivate to reduce average forecasts error" 83 (83): 303-325, 2008

    40 Eames, M, "Earnings predictability and the directing of analysts’ earnings forecast errors" 78 (78): 707-724, 2003

    41 Miller, G, "Earnings performance and discretionary disclosure" 40 (40): 173-204, 2002

    42 Burgstahler, D, "Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses" 24 (24): 99-126, 1997

    43 Das, S, "Earings predictability and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts" 73 (73): 277-294, 1998

    44 Bowen, R, "Do conference calls affect analysts’ forecasts?" 77 (77): 285-317, 2002

    45 Bradshaw, M. T, "Do analysts and auditors use information in accruals?" 39 (39): 45-74, 2001

    46 McNichols, M, "Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors" 77 (77): 61-69, 2002

    47 Byard, D, "Corporate disclosure quality and properties of analysts’ information environment" 18 (18): 355-378, 2003

    48 Lang, M, "Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior" 71 (71): 467-492, 1996

    49 Frankel, R, "Characteristics of a firm’s information environment and the information asymmetry between insiders and outsiders" 37 (37): 229-259, 2004

    50 Barron, O, "Changes in analysts’ information around earnings announcements" 77 (77): 821-846, 2002

    51 Peasnell, K. V, "Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals?" 32 : 1311-1346, 2005

    52 O’Brien, P. C, "Analysts’ forecasts as earnings expectations" 10 (10): 53-83, 1988

    53 Schipper, K, "Analysts’ forecasts" 5 (5): 105-121, 1991

    54 Lee, K. J, "Analysts’ ability to forecast firms’ earnings" 14 (14): 193-214, 1992

    55 Kim, C, "Analyst forecast inefficiency in reaction to earnings news: cognitive bias vs. economic incentives" City University of Hong Kong 2007

    56 O’Brien. P. C, "Analyst following and institutional ownership" 28 : 55-76, 1990

    57 Barth, M. E, "Analyst coverage and intangible assets" 39 (39): 1-34, 2001

    58 Eddy, A, "An examination of hypotheses concerning earnings forecast errors" 31 (31): 22-37, 1992

    59 Penman, S. H, "An evaluation of accounting rates of return" 6 : 233-255, 1991

    60 Lobo, J, "Accruals quality and analyst coverage" University of Houston 2006

    61 Lee, J, "A study on the value of IPO firms and the determinants of issue price of IPO stocks" 83 : 3-25, 1995

    62 Freeman, R, "A nonlinear model of security price responses to unexpected earnings" 30 (30): 185-209, 1992

    63 Basi, B. A, "A comparison of the accuracy of corporate and security analysts’ forecasts of earnings" 51 (51): 244-254, 1976

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼