This paper describes perception and writing styles of Yeon Cheon Hong Seok Joo that are presented in Biji scripts. The very first analytical view of Yeon Cheon on Biji scripts is to answer the question. ``who wrote it``. The reason that lies behind pr...
This paper describes perception and writing styles of Yeon Cheon Hong Seok Joo that are presented in Biji scripts. The very first analytical view of Yeon Cheon on Biji scripts is to answer the question. ``who wrote it``. The reason that lies behind problematizing the author of the scripts draws upon his judgement that in order to examine correctly, the authorship is crucial. Moreover he emphasized the importance of description of objective facts: and argued for mastering data proving a fact. This argument of Yeon Cheon came from his perception of Biji scripts as a history: and from a implicit rejection against tendency in those days describing emotions. This kind of attitude was presented in the sentence theory of Bill that covers his use of words and construction change. Specially Yeon Cheon tried to recover the dynamics of sentences through the change in construction and description style of sentences. By doing this Yeon Cheon overcome the limit of Biii scripts: and approached very concretely the extent of Kyong Seo and Dang Song Kho Mun. The way to describe a character that is found in the writing of Yeon Cheon is to locate core points upfront and the emphasis of subsequent mentioning according to characters. By doing this Yeon Cheon made it obvious the emphasizing points and described characters in a concrete shape. All of this was writing strategy of Veon Cheon that emphasized the characters of figures. Also this strategy is consistent with Dang Song Ghomun School during Myeong period including Mho Ghon. This implies that Yeon Cheon had many thoughts over Dang Song Ghomun.