RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    자살관여행위의 가벌성 근거  :  The Basis of Punishability for Suicide Participation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82585835

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The core of the problem of the crime of aiding and abetting suicide(§252②, Criminal Law) is a rational explanation for the basis of punishability for suicide participation and its commencement of the commission from premises that suicide participation is provided in the same article with murder upon request and homicide with consent and it has same statutory penalty. Although it is the predominant view that suicide participation is a separate principal offense type in spite of the act patterns of committing abetment and assist, actual profit of distinction suicide participation that is provided in the form of accomplice from murder upon request in the form of principal is not inconsiderable. Even though suicide participation is punishable enough by being prepared its special constituent requisite, the dependency of accomplice shall not be disregarded for the reasons of act of committing in the accomplice form of abetting and assist. In many cases, the legality theory of suicide or the legal free zone theory of suicide is supported by the independent crime theory of suicide, but we shall not regard disposal of life as legal conduct or evaluation-suspended conduct. Because the interest of respect for each individual's self-determination right should not accomplished in the matter of life disposal that means destruction of each individual. In the concern of life disposal, both of the right self-determination(autonomy) and life(existence) are violated in homicide, but only life(existence) is violated in the crimes of homicide with consent. Such difference between these two types of crime is the base of reduction illegality and punishment of homicide with consent and suicide participation against homicide. Suicide is illegal misconduct although it has committed on one's responsibility. Because blocking commitment of suicide is completely legal and adequate behavior without composing violence whether suicide is self-answerable or not.
    번역하기

    The core of the problem of the crime of aiding and abetting suicide(§252②, Criminal Law) is a rational explanation for the basis of punishability for suicide participation and its commencement of the commission from premises that suicide participat...

    The core of the problem of the crime of aiding and abetting suicide(§252②, Criminal Law) is a rational explanation for the basis of punishability for suicide participation and its commencement of the commission from premises that suicide participation is provided in the same article with murder upon request and homicide with consent and it has same statutory penalty. Although it is the predominant view that suicide participation is a separate principal offense type in spite of the act patterns of committing abetment and assist, actual profit of distinction suicide participation that is provided in the form of accomplice from murder upon request in the form of principal is not inconsiderable. Even though suicide participation is punishable enough by being prepared its special constituent requisite, the dependency of accomplice shall not be disregarded for the reasons of act of committing in the accomplice form of abetting and assist. In many cases, the legality theory of suicide or the legal free zone theory of suicide is supported by the independent crime theory of suicide, but we shall not regard disposal of life as legal conduct or evaluation-suspended conduct. Because the interest of respect for each individual's self-determination right should not accomplished in the matter of life disposal that means destruction of each individual. In the concern of life disposal, both of the right self-determination(autonomy) and life(existence) are violated in homicide, but only life(existence) is violated in the crimes of homicide with consent. Such difference between these two types of crime is the base of reduction illegality and punishment of homicide with consent and suicide participation against homicide. Suicide is illegal misconduct although it has committed on one's responsibility. Because blocking commitment of suicide is completely legal and adequate behavior without composing violence whether suicide is self-answerable or not.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 들어가며
    • Ⅱ. 자살적법설과 자살관여죄의 처벌근거
    • Ⅲ. 자살위법설과 자살관여죄의 처벌근거
    • Ⅳ. 나오며
    • [참고문헌]
    • Ⅰ. 들어가며
    • Ⅱ. 자살적법설과 자살관여죄의 처벌근거
    • Ⅲ. 자살위법설과 자살관여죄의 처벌근거
    • Ⅳ. 나오며
    • [참고문헌]
    • 〈Abstract〉
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 배종대, "형법각론(제6전정판)" 홍문사 2003

    2 임웅, "형법각론(개정판보정)" 법문사 2005

    3 김상호, "형법각론" 세종출판사 2004

    4 김일수, "한국형법 Ⅲ[개정판]" 박영사 1997

    5 정창운, "자살의 죄책성" 1966

    6 성낙현, "자살관여행위의 가벌성에 관한 한국과 독일형법의 비교" 한국비교형사법학회 6 (6): 417-444, 2004

    7 정성근, "살인죄와 자살관여죄의 한계" 97 (97):

    8 김영환, "법철학의 근본문제" 홍문사 2006

    9 전지연, "간접정범의 기본구조와 자살참가에서의 간접정범" (6) : 1993

    10 若尾岳志, "自殺関与罪の處罰根拠(一)" (94) : 2000

    1 배종대, "형법각론(제6전정판)" 홍문사 2003

    2 임웅, "형법각론(개정판보정)" 법문사 2005

    3 김상호, "형법각론" 세종출판사 2004

    4 김일수, "한국형법 Ⅲ[개정판]" 박영사 1997

    5 정창운, "자살의 죄책성" 1966

    6 성낙현, "자살관여행위의 가벌성에 관한 한국과 독일형법의 비교" 한국비교형사법학회 6 (6): 417-444, 2004

    7 정성근, "살인죄와 자살관여죄의 한계" 97 (97):

    8 김영환, "법철학의 근본문제" 홍문사 2006

    9 전지연, "간접정범의 기본구조와 자살참가에서의 간접정범" (6) : 1993

    10 若尾岳志, "自殺関与罪の處罰根拠(一)" (94) : 2000

    11 秋葉悅子, "自殺関与罪に関する考察" 32 (32): 1989

    12 谷直之, "自殺関与罪に関する一考察" 44 (44): 1994

    13 林幹人, "自殺関与罪" (402) : 1988

    14 塩谷毅, "自殺関与事例における被害者自己答責性(二)" (257) : 1998

    15 上田健二, "自殺-違法か,適法か,それとも何か" 2 : 2000

    16 권오걸, "生命保護의 觀點에서 본 自殺 敎唆?幇助罪의 검토" 한국형사법학회 19 (19): 421-440, 2007

    17 福田雅章, "大阪地裁安楽死事件解題" (108) : 1978

    18 大塚仁, "刑法槪說(總論)[改訂增補版]" 1992

    19 大塚仁, "刑法槪說(各論)[第3版]" 1996

    20 曾根威彦, "刑法における正当化の理論" 成文堂 1980

    21 上田健二, "刑事法学の動き-秋葉論文に対する書評" 64 (64): 1992

    22 Noll, "Übergesetzliche Rechtfertigungsgrunde im besondern die Einwilligung des Verletzten"

    23 Weigend, "Über die Begründung der Straflosigkeit bei Einwilligung des Betroffenen" 98 : 1986

    24 Marx, "Zur Definition des Begriffs. Rechtsgut"

    25 Jakobs, "Zum Unrecht der Selbsttötung und der Tötung auf Verlangen, FS-Kaufmann"

    26 Tröndle, "Warum ist die Sterbehilfe ein rechtliches Problem?" 99 : 1987

    27 Bringewat, "Unbeachtlicher Selbsttötungswille und ernstliches Tötungsverlangenen Wilderspruch?, Suizid und Euthanasie" 1976

    28 Noll, "Tatbestand und Rechtswidrigkeit: Die Wertabwäagung als Prinzip der Rechtfertugung" 77 : 1965

    29 Stratenwerth, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil I, 3. Aufl" 1981

    30 Galllas, "Strafbares Unterlassen im Fall einer Selbsttötung, Beitrage zur Verbrechenslehre"

    31 Schmidhäuser, "Selbstmord und Beteiligung am Selbstmord in strafrechtlicher Sicht, FS-Welzel"

    32 Stratenwerth, "Prinzipien der Rechtfertigung" 68 : 1956

    33 Feuerbach, "Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland geltenden Peinlichen Rechts"

    34 Williams, "Glanville The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law" 1957

    35 Dölling, "Fahrlässige Tötung bei Selbstgefährdung des Opfers"

    36 Hirsch, "Einwilligung und Selbstbestimmung, FS-Welzel"

    37 Keßler, "Einwilligung des Verleztenn" 1984

    38 Otto, "Eigenverantwortliche Selbstschädigung und gefähedung sowie einverstandliche Fremdschädigung und -gefährdung"

    39 Engisch, "Die Strafwürdigkeit der Unfruchtbarmachung mit Einwilligung"

    40 Neumann, "Die Strafbarkeit der Suizidbeteiligung als Problem der Eigenverantwortlichkeit des „Opfers“"

    41 Bringewat, "Die Strafbarkeit der Beteiligung an fremder Selbsttötung als Grenzproblem der Strafrechtsdogmatik" 87 : 1975

    42 Göbel, "Die Einwilligung im Strafrecht als Ausprägung des Selbstbestimmungsrechts"

    43 Arzt, "Die Delikte gegen das Leben" 83 : 1971

    44 Schroeder, "Beihilfe zum Selbstmord und Tötung auf Verlangen" 106 : 1994

    45 Hirsch, "Behandlungsabbruch und Sterbehilfe, FS-Lackner"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.94 0.94 0.95
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.94 0.89 1.109 0.3
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼