RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    오바마 행정부의 대 중동,헤즈볼라정책에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Obama Administration`s Foreign Policies on the Middle East and Hezbollah

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the Obama Administration`s foreign policies on the Middle East and Hezbollah. The traditional U.S. foreign policy guideline since WWII has emphasized the superiority of military and economic power, construction of a worldwide political-military network, trade, and financial liberalization. Obama`s foreign policies, however, differ from these traditional guidelines. Instead, Obama argues that the U.S. should recognize its decline of influence in world affairs and thereby pursue a managed decline. This outlook implies that Obama strives to establish multilateral relations with other countries and applies soft-power foreign policies as a win-win game. In spite of his ambitious foreign policy initiative, there has not been much progress made in the Middle East and Hezbollah. Concerning the conflict between Israel and Palestine, the Obama administration adheres to the original two-state solution but has not made further progress in this area. Additionally, the issue of Iranian uranium enriching has not been resolved, and the Taliban`s influence and territorial control in Afghanistan have increased despite the increased number of U.S. troops in the region. The Obama administration continues to list Hezbollah as a foreign terrorist organization and does not maintain any communications with the group. In the meantime, Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah have formed a tripartite alliance to combat Israeli aggression. How can we explain Obama`s slow progress in foreign policy in the Middle East? Although we can argue that Obama was more focused on domestic issues such as health care reform during his early period of presidency, the main reason for his slow progress is the limitation of his soft-power foreign policies. Soft-power foreign policies differ from hard-power policies, which were well-employed by the Bush administration. Soft-power foreign policy is time-consuming and requires diplomatic skills. To obtain better results in his Middle Eastern and Hezbollah policies in the future, Obama should apply a mixture of soft-power and hard-power diplomacy based on a constructivist approach.
    번역하기

    The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the Obama Administration`s foreign policies on the Middle East and Hezbollah. The traditional U.S. foreign policy guideline since WWII has emphasized the superiority of military and economic power, construc...

    The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the Obama Administration`s foreign policies on the Middle East and Hezbollah. The traditional U.S. foreign policy guideline since WWII has emphasized the superiority of military and economic power, construction of a worldwide political-military network, trade, and financial liberalization. Obama`s foreign policies, however, differ from these traditional guidelines. Instead, Obama argues that the U.S. should recognize its decline of influence in world affairs and thereby pursue a managed decline. This outlook implies that Obama strives to establish multilateral relations with other countries and applies soft-power foreign policies as a win-win game. In spite of his ambitious foreign policy initiative, there has not been much progress made in the Middle East and Hezbollah. Concerning the conflict between Israel and Palestine, the Obama administration adheres to the original two-state solution but has not made further progress in this area. Additionally, the issue of Iranian uranium enriching has not been resolved, and the Taliban`s influence and territorial control in Afghanistan have increased despite the increased number of U.S. troops in the region. The Obama administration continues to list Hezbollah as a foreign terrorist organization and does not maintain any communications with the group. In the meantime, Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah have formed a tripartite alliance to combat Israeli aggression. How can we explain Obama`s slow progress in foreign policy in the Middle East? Although we can argue that Obama was more focused on domestic issues such as health care reform during his early period of presidency, the main reason for his slow progress is the limitation of his soft-power foreign policies. Soft-power foreign policies differ from hard-power policies, which were well-employed by the Bush administration. Soft-power foreign policy is time-consuming and requires diplomatic skills. To obtain better results in his Middle Eastern and Hezbollah policies in the future, Obama should apply a mixture of soft-power and hard-power diplomacy based on a constructivist approach.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박찬기, "헤즈볼라(Hezbollah)의 형성과정에 관한 연구" 한국국제정치학회 48 (48): 199-232, 2008

    2 "헤럴드경제"

    3 "주간조선"

    4 "조선일보"

    5 김영호, "오바마 행정부의 핵군축 정책과 한국 안보" 국가안전보장문제연구소 53 (53): 47-69, 2010

    6 박찬기, "오바마 행정부의 對 중동정책과 헤즈볼라. in: 버락 오바마 시대의 중동(The Middle East in the Era of Barack Obama" 건국대 중동연구소 2008

    7 "연합뉴스"

    8 김영호, "스마트 파워 전략과 한국군의 국제평화활동" 동아시아국제정치학회 12 (12): 47-67, 2009

    9 김영미, "미 아프간주둔 사령관, 일부러 쫓겨났나?"

    10 이종택, "레바논 히즈불라(Hizballah in Lebanon)" 11 : 2001

    1 박찬기, "헤즈볼라(Hezbollah)의 형성과정에 관한 연구" 한국국제정치학회 48 (48): 199-232, 2008

    2 "헤럴드경제"

    3 "주간조선"

    4 "조선일보"

    5 김영호, "오바마 행정부의 핵군축 정책과 한국 안보" 국가안전보장문제연구소 53 (53): 47-69, 2010

    6 박찬기, "오바마 행정부의 對 중동정책과 헤즈볼라. in: 버락 오바마 시대의 중동(The Middle East in the Era of Barack Obama" 건국대 중동연구소 2008

    7 "연합뉴스"

    8 김영호, "스마트 파워 전략과 한국군의 국제평화활동" 동아시아국제정치학회 12 (12): 47-67, 2009

    9 김영미, "미 아프간주둔 사령관, 일부러 쫓겨났나?"

    10 이종택, "레바논 히즈불라(Hizballah in Lebanon)" 11 : 2001

    11 문정인, "레바논 분쟁의 이해: 종파적 분열과 외세개입을 중심으로 한 분석" 7 : 1988

    12 Heydemann, Steven, "Why Syria Needs to get a Grip" 20 : 2010

    13 SteveySA, "What the different between democrat and republican?"

    14 Abdul-Hussain, Hussain, "What the Scud Crisis Revealed" 10 : 2010

    15 "Washington Times"

    16 Noe, Nicholas, "Voice of Hezbollah: The Statements of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah" Verso 2007

    17 Hovsepian, Nubar, "The War on Lebanon: A Reader" Olive Branch Press 2008

    18 Salibi, Kamal, "The Modern History of Lebanon" Caravan Books 1999

    19 Mearsheimer, John J., "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2007

    20 Nye, Jr., Joseph S, "Testing Obama's Foreign Policy"

    21 Anderson, James H, "Syria's Record Intact" 5 : 2010

    22 Brooks, David, "Politics in the Age of Distrust" 22 : 2010

    23 Pilkington, "Obama's Year One" 2010

    24 Kagan, Robert, "Obama's Year One" 2010

    25 Lane, Charles, "Obama's Year One" 2010

    26 "Now Lebanon"

    27 "New York Times"

    28 Dias, Tom, "Lightning out of Lebanon: Hezbollah Terrorists on American Soil" Ballantine Books 2006

    29 Picard, Elizabeth, "Lebanon: A Shattered Country: Myths and Realities of the Wars in Lebanon" Holmes & Meier 2002

    30 Mackey, Sandra, "Lebanon: A House Divided" W.W. Norton & Company 2006

    31 Safran, Nadav, "Israel: The Embattled Ally" Harvard University Press 1981

    32 Harris, William, "Iran, Hezbollah, and the Bomb" 7 : 2010

    33 Athahasiadis, Iason, "Iran between Dictatorship and a Hobbesian Free-for-All" 19 : 2010

    34 MEMRI, "Inquiry & Analysis Series Report" 23 (23): 2005

    35 Hamzeh, Ahmad Nizar, "In The Path of Hizbullah" Syracuse University Press 2004

    36 Qassem, Naim, "Hizbullah: The Story from Within" Saqi Books 2005

    37 Saad-Ghorayeb, Amal, "Hizbu'llah: Politics and Religion" Pluto Press 2002

    38 Harik, Judith Palmer, "Hezbollah: The Changing Face of Terrorism" I.B. Tauris 2006

    39 Jaber, Hala, "Hezbollah: Born with a Vengeance" Columbia University Press 1997

    40 Norton, Augustus Richard, "Hezbollah: A Short History" Princeton University Press 2007

    41 Pillai, Prabhakar, "Differences Between the Democratic and the Republican Party"

    42 "Daily Star"

    43 Khalaf, Samir, "Civil and Uncivil Violence in Lebanon" Columbia University Press 2002

    44 Dawahare, Michael D., "Civil Society and Lebanon" Brown Walker Press 2000

    45 "Christian Science Monitor"

    46 "Chosun.com"

    47 Bahour, Sam, "An Unexpected Leap on the Palestine Issue" 24 : 2010

    48 Norton, Augustus Richard, "Amal and the Shi'a: Struggle for the Soul of Lebanon" University of Texas Press 1987

    49 Parthasarathy, G., "AFPAK for Dummies" 2010

    50 Salibi, Kamal, "A House of Many Mansions: The History of Lebanon Reconsidered" University of California Press 1988

    51 Peter, Tom A., "A Hizbullah Victory Would Strain Ties with the US and with Pro-Western Nations like Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia" 7 : 2009

    52 Traboulsi, Fawwaz, "A History of Modern Lebanon" Pluto Press 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-08-22 학회명변경 영문명 : Research Institute On National Security Affairs -> Research Institute for National Security Affairs KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.61 0.972 0.29
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼