이스라엘ㆍ미국 및 북한ㆍ중국 동맹의 안보딜레마 비교 = 정치주도형 안보파트너십 모형을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Conflict and cooperation are the common factors coexisting in the alliance relation, but unfortunately the previous study of security dilemma theory has been focused on simple matter of the entrapment or abandonment between the allied nations. The purpose of this thesis is to analyze beyond the preceding study of security dilemma theory by classifying the complex phenomena of conflict and cooperation in the alliance relation into a 2 2 matrix of security partnership in the political and military level, and analyze the security dilemma cases of the Israel-US and North Korea-China alliance.
Since the Israel-US and North Korea-China alliance had been shaped as Solidarity Security Partnership, the two alliances are now converting or have been converted to the Political-led Security Partnership, which compromises both political cooperation and military conflict, a new phenomenon differing from the preceeding partnership of entrapment or abandonment. Moreover, the initiative of alliance relation has been shifted from the weak to the strong. Instead of restricting the autonomy of the politically and economically weak nation in an asymmetrical relation, the stronger nation starts to be influenced by the politics of the other and draws spotlights of the criticism in the international community. One of the reasons is that the U.S. government is affected by the group of the pro-Israel, and that the Chinese government is attached to the geopolitical importance of Korean Peninsula’s Status quo. Additionally, in the perspective of alliance theory, two weak nations with Cold War’s glooming legacy in the free world and Communist world have been in the dispute, while the strong nations are trying to solve the conflicts with non-military methods. This raises doubts of the feasibility and durability of the peace-oriented paradigm in the international society.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김한규, "한중관계사" 도서출판 아르케 1999

2 "중국에 북은 미국의 이스라엘보다 중요"

3 국제위기감시기구."중국과 북한:영원한 동지인가?"아시아 보고서 N 112(, "중국과 북한: 영원한 동지인가?" 아시아 보고서 2006

4 최명해, "중국∙북한 동맹관계:불편한 동거의 역사" 도서출판 오름 2009

5 박찬기, "오바마 행정부의 대 중동· 헤즈볼라정책에 관한 연구" 국가안전보장문제연구소 53 (53): 105-135, 2010

6 윤형호, "안보파트너십과 한미안보동맹의 제도화" 국민대학교 정치외교학과 2009

7 노암 촘스키, "숙명의 트라이앵글" 도서출판 2001

8 최명해, "북한의 대중‘의존’과 중국의 대북 영향력 평가" 외교안보연구원 2010

9 최명해, "북∙중 동맹조약 체결에 관한 소고" 한국정치학회 42 (42): 317-340, 2008

10 리단, "북·중 동맹 변화에 관한 연구" 한국동북아학회 9 (9): 2004

11 박종평, "미국의 중동정책 기조와 부시행정부의 대중동정책 전망" 5 (5): 2001

12 이종택, "미국의 아랍-이스라엘 분쟁에 대한 정책" 21 (21): 2000

13 홍순남, "미국의 대 중동정책- 부시행정부를 중심으로 -" 지중해지역원 10 (10): 97-127, 2008

14 "미국-이스라엘 군사관계 어느 때 보다 강력, 미 행정부 관리들"

15 윤형호, "미국, 이스라엘, 그리고 이스라엘-팔레스타인 평화 전망 모델 : 오바마 행정부의 중도 조정자 역할과 이스라엘의 인식을 중심으로" 한국중동학회 31 (31): 1-46, 2010

16 이종택, "미-이스라엘간 특별한 관계와 팔레스타인평화" 13 (13): 2003

17 서상문, "모택동과 6∙25전쟁" 국방부 군사편찬연구소 2006

18 이옥정, "동아시아 전쟁사 최근연구 논문선집"

19 Walt, Stephen M., "Why Alliances Endure or Collapse" 39 (39): 1997

20 CBS News, "What Rift? Obama: U.S., Israel Bond Tight As Ever"

21 Huntington, Samuel P., "The Soldier and the State: the Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations" Harvard University Press 1957

22 Snyder, Glenn H., "The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics" 36 (36): 1984

23 Diller, Daniel C., "The Middle East (Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Inc.,1994)"

24 Mearsheimer, John J. and Stephen M. Walt, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy"

25 Kissinger, "Simon & Schuster"

26 Milbank, Dana, "Netanyahu hears no discouraging word from Obama"

27 Lider, Julian, "Military Theory: Concept, structure, problems" Gower Pub 1983

28 "FACTBOX-Israeli settlements are first hurdle to peace talks"

29 Morrow, James D., "Arms versus allies: trade-offs in the search for security" 47 (47): 1993

30 Liska,George F., "Alliance and the Third World" The Johns Hopkins Press 1968

31 Walt, Stephen M., "Alliance Formations and the Balance of World Power" 9 (9): 1985

32 Cha, Victor D., "Alignment Despite Antagonism: the United States-Korea-Japan Security Triangle" Stanford University Press 1999