RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      미국 대학의 기업화

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82363985

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The university has traditionally been supposed to be the autonomous community of professors and students in pursuit of knowledge. This tradition had been secured with the indoctrination of the right of self-rule
      and the financial support of the church and state to the community in the medieval age. The foundation of the University of Berlin by Wilhelm von Humboldt in the early 19th century established the notion of the university
      as the institution of pure scientific research in addition to the medieval tradition. The University of Berlin has functioned as a role model in the construction of university missions throughout the world. However, since the late 20th century American corporate universities have deteriorated the university mission for the interest of business corporations. This paper examines the emergence and functions of American corporate universities.
      The unique tradition of American private universities renders the university vulnerable to the interests of business corporations. The governing body of American universities has had to manage the institution economically, efficiently, and profitably with the limits of public financial support. Thereby, American universities have been transformed into business corporations in that economy, efficiency, and profit-making are what capitalistic corporations pursue for. Recently, for-profit universities such as the University of Phoenix and corporate universities per se, the employee-training institutions in corporations such as the Hamburger university of McDonald’s are joining corporatized higher education in the United States. The prosperity of corporate universities in the United States threatens the traditional university and its mission of knowledge pursuit. With the superpower influence of the United States in the contemporary world, the corporate management style of American universities is being instilled in the universities in the rest of the world. As a consequence, humanities in the university are in decline in most universities. However, prestigious private universities and liberal arts colleges in the United States still maintain humanities programs for the interests of the privileged class in the United States. Humanities are now privatized by prestigious rich elites
      in the American society and thereby function to maintain the status quo for them. The mission of humanities and the university is in ruins.
      번역하기

      The university has traditionally been supposed to be the autonomous community of professors and students in pursuit of knowledge. This tradition had been secured with the indoctrination of the right of self-rule and the financial support of the church...

      The university has traditionally been supposed to be the autonomous community of professors and students in pursuit of knowledge. This tradition had been secured with the indoctrination of the right of self-rule
      and the financial support of the church and state to the community in the medieval age. The foundation of the University of Berlin by Wilhelm von Humboldt in the early 19th century established the notion of the university
      as the institution of pure scientific research in addition to the medieval tradition. The University of Berlin has functioned as a role model in the construction of university missions throughout the world. However, since the late 20th century American corporate universities have deteriorated the university mission for the interest of business corporations. This paper examines the emergence and functions of American corporate universities.
      The unique tradition of American private universities renders the university vulnerable to the interests of business corporations. The governing body of American universities has had to manage the institution economically, efficiently, and profitably with the limits of public financial support. Thereby, American universities have been transformed into business corporations in that economy, efficiency, and profit-making are what capitalistic corporations pursue for. Recently, for-profit universities such as the University of Phoenix and corporate universities per se, the employee-training institutions in corporations such as the Hamburger university of McDonald’s are joining corporatized higher education in the United States. The prosperity of corporate universities in the United States threatens the traditional university and its mission of knowledge pursuit. With the superpower influence of the United States in the contemporary world, the corporate management style of American universities is being instilled in the universities in the rest of the world. As a consequence, humanities in the university are in decline in most universities. However, prestigious private universities and liberal arts colleges in the United States still maintain humanities programs for the interests of the privileged class in the United States. Humanities are now privatized by prestigious rich elites
      in the American society and thereby function to maintain the status quo for them. The mission of humanities and the university is in ruins.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 로렌스 솔리, "학계에 대한 기업의 새로운 야망 in: 대학과 제국: 학문과 돈, 권력의 은밀한 거래" 당대 319-345, 2004

      2 김누리, "주식회사 유니버시티 대학의 기업화와 학문공동체의 위기(Ⅰ)" 영미문학연구회 (27) : 163-187, 2009

      3 전국교수노동조합, "우리대학, 절망에서 희망으로" 노기연 2006

      4 이석우, "대학의 역사" 한길사 1998

      5 브루스 커밍스, "대학과 제국: 학문과 돈, 권력의 은밀한 거래" 당대 2004

      6 박정원, "교육혁명을 이루기 위한 고등교육재정 개혁방안 in: 우리대학, 절망에서 희망으로" 노기연 246-254, 2006

      7 Tuchman,Gaye, "Wannabe U:Inside the Corporate University" U of Chicago P 2009

      8 Washburn, Jennifer, "University Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education" Basic 2005

      9 Readings,Bill, "The University in Ruins" Harvard UP 1996

      10 Scott, John C., "The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations" 77 (77): 1-39, 2006

      1 로렌스 솔리, "학계에 대한 기업의 새로운 야망 in: 대학과 제국: 학문과 돈, 권력의 은밀한 거래" 당대 319-345, 2004

      2 김누리, "주식회사 유니버시티 대학의 기업화와 학문공동체의 위기(Ⅰ)" 영미문학연구회 (27) : 163-187, 2009

      3 전국교수노동조합, "우리대학, 절망에서 희망으로" 노기연 2006

      4 이석우, "대학의 역사" 한길사 1998

      5 브루스 커밍스, "대학과 제국: 학문과 돈, 권력의 은밀한 거래" 당대 2004

      6 박정원, "교육혁명을 이루기 위한 고등교육재정 개혁방안 in: 우리대학, 절망에서 희망으로" 노기연 246-254, 2006

      7 Tuchman,Gaye, "Wannabe U:Inside the Corporate University" U of Chicago P 2009

      8 Washburn, Jennifer, "University Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education" Basic 2005

      9 Readings,Bill, "The University in Ruins" Harvard UP 1996

      10 Scott, John C., "The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations" 77 (77): 1-39, 2006

      11 Donoghue,Frank, "The Last Professors:The Corporate University and the Fate of the Humanities" Fordham UP 2008

      12 Schultz, David, "The Corporate University in American Society" 4 (4): 1-16, 2004

      13 Johnson, Benjamin, "Steal This University:The Rise of the Corporate University and the Academic Labor Movement" Routledge 2003

      14 Miyoshi, Masao, "Ivory Tower in Escrow" 27 (27): 7-50, 2000

      15 Allen, Mark, "Introduction: What is a Corporate University and Why Should an Organization Have One?"

      16 Wallerstein,Immanuel, "Geopolitics and Geoculture:Essays on the Changing World-System" Cambridge UP 1991

      17 Apollo Group, Inc, "Creating Opportunities: 2009 Annual Report"

      18 Meister,Jeanne C., "Corporate Universities:Lessons in Building A World-Class Work Force" McGraw-Hill 1998

      19 Sporn, Barbara, "Convergence or Divergence in International Higher Education Policy: Lessons from Europe"

      20 Nelson, Cary, "Academic Keywords:A Devil’s Dictionary for Higher Education" Routledge 1999

      21 Thelin,John R., "A History of American Higher Education" Johns Hopkins UP 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학회명변경 영문명 : The Criticism And Theory Society Of Korea -> The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-11-28 학술지등록 한글명 : 비평과이론
      외국어명 : The Journal of Criticism and Theory
      KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.43 0.36 1.442 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼