RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      권필(權필)과 허균(許筠)의 교유(交遊)와 그 당대적(當代的) 의미(意味) = Association between Kwon Pil and Heo Gyun and Its Historical Meanings

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The objective of the present study is to examine the pattern of association between Kwon Pil (1569-1612) and Heo Gyun (1569-1618) and its historical meanings. The two persons have drawn people`s attention as critics and poets representing the mid Chosun Dynasty. Their similar position as outsiders induced them to have free and individual consciousness and to share the thematic dimension with each other to some degree. Through the two persons and people who associated with them, we can identify the pattern of outside beings engendered through various paths different from the past. In addition, through literary association, they played the role of a meaningful critic to each other. We can see that they pinpointed the merits of each other`s poems and formalized them in the context of the history of poetry, and showed continuous interest in each other`s works through creation and criticism. Another characteristic to be mentioned is that they were involved in the publication of anthologies and the writing of forewords for each other with some understanding of the literary tradition of each other`s family. On the other hand, with regard to the influence and acceptance of literary trends in the late Ming Dynasty, which is one of keywords in understanding the history of literature in those days, we can find a difference between the two. The difference in accepting literary trends from the Ming Dynasty can be an important clue for explaining phenomena in the literary circle in those days. That is, the literary circle of Chosun in the late 16th century and the early 17th century did not accept widely the writings of the earlier seven masters and later seven masters of the Ming Dynasty, or accepted them selectively. This needs to be explained further through close examination of their works during this period, and making topographical maps according to the grouping of literati.
      번역하기

      The objective of the present study is to examine the pattern of association between Kwon Pil (1569-1612) and Heo Gyun (1569-1618) and its historical meanings. The two persons have drawn people`s attention as critics and poets representing the mid Chos...

      The objective of the present study is to examine the pattern of association between Kwon Pil (1569-1612) and Heo Gyun (1569-1618) and its historical meanings. The two persons have drawn people`s attention as critics and poets representing the mid Chosun Dynasty. Their similar position as outsiders induced them to have free and individual consciousness and to share the thematic dimension with each other to some degree. Through the two persons and people who associated with them, we can identify the pattern of outside beings engendered through various paths different from the past. In addition, through literary association, they played the role of a meaningful critic to each other. We can see that they pinpointed the merits of each other`s poems and formalized them in the context of the history of poetry, and showed continuous interest in each other`s works through creation and criticism. Another characteristic to be mentioned is that they were involved in the publication of anthologies and the writing of forewords for each other with some understanding of the literary tradition of each other`s family. On the other hand, with regard to the influence and acceptance of literary trends in the late Ming Dynasty, which is one of keywords in understanding the history of literature in those days, we can find a difference between the two. The difference in accepting literary trends from the Ming Dynasty can be an important clue for explaining phenomena in the literary circle in those days. That is, the literary circle of Chosun in the late 16th century and the early 17th century did not accept widely the writings of the earlier seven masters and later seven masters of the Ming Dynasty, or accepted them selectively. This needs to be explained further through close examination of their works during this period, and making topographical maps according to the grouping of literati.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼