RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    신학자 폴 틸리히의‘중심된 자기’의 존재론적 양극성관점에서 본 기독교상담의 정체성 = The Identity of Christian Counseling Based On the Concept of‘the Centered Self’of Ontological Polarity in Paul Tillich

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103798142

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The intention of this article starts from struggling and confusing
    ambiguities between general psychology and christian counseling. As a
    pastoral counselor I have encountered lots of psychologists and christian
    counselors who have used psychological counseling methods without
    figuring out the identity of christian counseling. Starting this ambiguous
    identity of Christian counseling, I presuppose two categories which interrupt
    and make confusion to Christian counseling. First presupposition is that
    contemporary society has emphasized the role of ‘the self’in which we
    have been recognized the possibilities and potentialities of the self. The
    possibility of self has shaped incredibly the identity of counselor and
    provides the positive self images which make christian counselors lean on
    totally themselves not the eternal. Second thing is that we christian
    counselors have trusted too much on counseling methodologies rather than
    focusing on or trusting on christian faith. In these processes it seems to me
    that we have lost so many christian heritages such as tradition, theology and
    so on. Theology, especially, is the product of christian struggles to identify
    who are humans and God, and it has continued for more than 2000 years.
    To be effective christian counselors we need and reflect this heritage in
    which our christian ancestors struggled for christian identities. In this sense I
    select theologian Paul Tillich who thought most deeply about depth
    psychology and theology to connect the both sides for the understandings
    of human. His answering theology, first of all, is based on human
    predicaments in which we humans have showed various symptoms. In this
    perspective his definition of human is that we humans have the potentiality
    which has been named as the image of God. But, simultaneously, it always
    has temptations which have attempted to be free from one’s boundary and
    finitude. Our human boundary and finitude have been called in his theology
    as unbelief, hubris and concupiscence. In addition, he indicates that psychological methods and ways are needed for effective counseling. But
    these elements should not be considered as first rather than preparing the
    space for the ultimate concern. The difference between christian counseling
    and general counseling is that christian counseling should consider the
    participation of Ultimate Concern who embraces and transcends the
    limitations of counselors. During the counseling, we need to invite first the
    participation of the Ultimate Concern and other counseling methodologies
    should be consider as the secondary sources. This attitude is the major
    difference. As we have reflected christian heritages, comparing with
    psychological understandings of humans and methodologies, we christian
    counselors will have effective and affluent resources for christian counseling.
    번역하기

    The intention of this article starts from struggling and confusing ambiguities between general psychology and christian counseling. As a pastoral counselor I have encountered lots of psychologists and christian counselors who have used psychological c...

    The intention of this article starts from struggling and confusing
    ambiguities between general psychology and christian counseling. As a
    pastoral counselor I have encountered lots of psychologists and christian
    counselors who have used psychological counseling methods without
    figuring out the identity of christian counseling. Starting this ambiguous
    identity of Christian counseling, I presuppose two categories which interrupt
    and make confusion to Christian counseling. First presupposition is that
    contemporary society has emphasized the role of ‘the self’in which we
    have been recognized the possibilities and potentialities of the self. The
    possibility of self has shaped incredibly the identity of counselor and
    provides the positive self images which make christian counselors lean on
    totally themselves not the eternal. Second thing is that we christian
    counselors have trusted too much on counseling methodologies rather than
    focusing on or trusting on christian faith. In these processes it seems to me
    that we have lost so many christian heritages such as tradition, theology and
    so on. Theology, especially, is the product of christian struggles to identify
    who are humans and God, and it has continued for more than 2000 years.
    To be effective christian counselors we need and reflect this heritage in
    which our christian ancestors struggled for christian identities. In this sense I
    select theologian Paul Tillich who thought most deeply about depth
    psychology and theology to connect the both sides for the understandings
    of human. His answering theology, first of all, is based on human
    predicaments in which we humans have showed various symptoms. In this
    perspective his definition of human is that we humans have the potentiality
    which has been named as the image of God. But, simultaneously, it always
    has temptations which have attempted to be free from one’s boundary and
    finitude. Our human boundary and finitude have been called in his theology
    as unbelief, hubris and concupiscence. In addition, he indicates that psychological methods and ways are needed for effective counseling. But
    these elements should not be considered as first rather than preparing the
    space for the ultimate concern. The difference between christian counseling
    and general counseling is that christian counseling should consider the
    participation of Ultimate Concern who embraces and transcends the
    limitations of counselors. During the counseling, we need to invite first the
    participation of the Ultimate Concern and other counseling methodologies
    should be consider as the secondary sources. This attitude is the major
    difference. As we have reflected christian heritages, comparing with
    psychological understandings of humans and methodologies, we christian
    counselors will have effective and affluent resources for christian counseling.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 임경수, "신학과 심리학의 연계적 학문을 통한 기독교상담의 정체성" 7 : 231-257, 2004

    2 신명숙, "목회상담의 정체성 확립을 위한 신학적 근거" 7 : 141-176, 2004

    3 Rogers, W., "Tillich and depth psychology. The thought of Paul Tillich" New York: Harper & Row 1985

    4 Adams, L., "The thought of Paul Tillich" New York: Harper & Row 1985

    5 McKelway, A., "The systematic theology of Paul Tillich: A review and analysis" Delta Book 1964

    6 Tillich, P., "The meaning of health: Essays in existentialism psychoanalysis and religion. Chicago: Exploration Press of Chicago Theological Seminary"

    7 Tillich, P., "The Spiritual situation in our technical society" Mercer University Press 1988

    8 Tillich, P., "The Courage to be" Yale University Press 1952

    9 Ulanov, A., "The Anxiety of being" Harper & Row 1985

    10 Tillich, P., "Systematic theology Vol. 3" University of Chicago Press 1963

    1 임경수, "신학과 심리학의 연계적 학문을 통한 기독교상담의 정체성" 7 : 231-257, 2004

    2 신명숙, "목회상담의 정체성 확립을 위한 신학적 근거" 7 : 141-176, 2004

    3 Rogers, W., "Tillich and depth psychology. The thought of Paul Tillich" New York: Harper & Row 1985

    4 Adams, L., "The thought of Paul Tillich" New York: Harper & Row 1985

    5 McKelway, A., "The systematic theology of Paul Tillich: A review and analysis" Delta Book 1964

    6 Tillich, P., "The meaning of health: Essays in existentialism psychoanalysis and religion. Chicago: Exploration Press of Chicago Theological Seminary"

    7 Tillich, P., "The Spiritual situation in our technical society" Mercer University Press 1988

    8 Tillich, P., "The Courage to be" Yale University Press 1952

    9 Ulanov, A., "The Anxiety of being" Harper & Row 1985

    10 Tillich, P., "Systematic theology Vol. 3" University of Chicago Press 1963

    11 Tillich, P., "Systematic theology Vol. 2" University of Chicago Press 1957

    12 Tillich, P., "Systematic theology Vol. 1" University of Chicago Press 1951

    13 Tayer, N., "Spirituality and pastoral care" Fortress Press 1985

    14 Tillich, P., "Psychoanalysis existentialism and theology" 87 : 16-17, 1958

    15 Tillich, P., "Psychoanalysis existentialism and theology" 87 : 16-17, 1958

    16 Cooper, T., "Paul tillich and psychology: Historic and contemporary exploration in theology, psychotherapy and ethics" Mercer University Press 2006

    17 Tillich, P., "On the boundary" Charles Scribner’s Sons 1966

    18 Capps, D., "Life cycle theory and pastoral care" Fortress Press 1983

    19 Lester, A., "Hope in pastoral care and counseling" Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press 1995

    20 Yalom, I., "Existential psychotherapy" Basic Books 1980

    21 Tillich, P., "Courage to be" Yale University Press 1952

    22 Freud, S., "Civilization and its discontents" Norton and Company 1961

    23 Clinebell, H., "Basic types of pastoral care & counseling" Abingdon Press 1990

    24 Davidson, C., "A theory of natural change revisited: Theology psychology and pastoral counseling" 47 (47): 1999

    25 Tillich, P., "A history of christian thought" Simon and Schuster 1968

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-06-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국기독교상담심리치료학회 -> 한국기독교상담심리학회
    영문명 : Korean Association of Christian Counseling & Psychotherapy -> Korean Association of Christian Counseling & Psychology
    KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.18 0.18 0.34
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.42 0.42 0.56 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼