동북아 주요국의 중재법제 비교연구 = A Comparative Study on Arbitration Law of Some Contries in the North-East Asia

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this thesis lies on building the foundation for the further activation of trade among the Northeast Asian countries such as South Korea, Japan, China, Russia, and North Korea through an analytical comparison of their arbitration systems.
Further activation of trade cannot be reached without previously building safety measures on the negotiation of exports, the control on defective imported merchandise, the returns on investments, and the stable management of businesses.
Throughout this thesis an analytical compahson of these five countries' most important areas on arbitration will be carried out. These areas are the arbitration laws and organizations; the structures of the laws; scope of arbitration; form of arbitration agreement, appointment of arbitratiors, Place of arbitration, hearing, court assistance in taking evidence, governing law, decision making by panel of arbitrators, form and contents of awards, effective of award, recourse against award, recognition and enforcement of awards, etc.
It was found in each of the areas cases to be identical, similar or verydifferent; also, cases unable to arbitrate. This phenomenon was found to occur due to the differences in political and economic systems and perception of arbitration among these countries. Additionally, this thesis points out what should each country do for its integration.
It is also suggested the organization of a common arbitration research body to continue the efforts for raising the awareness, building trust, and mutual recognition among the countries to ultimately create a common arbitration system. Lastly, it is a personal will that this thesis will serve as the starting point for in depth researches in each of the presented areas.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 서론
• II. 국가별 중재법제 비교분석
• III. 요약 및 시사점
• IV. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "한일중재법상 중재판정의 비교법적 고찰" 한국중재학회 16 (16): 2006.3

2 "한국중재법, 법률제 6083호" 1999

3 김석철, "칭따오 진출 한국기업을 위한 중재절차 통일화에 관한 연구" 15 (15): 2005.8

4 "중화인민공화국 중재법의 내용과 문제점 고찰" 한중법학회 1998

5 이주원, "중국중재제도의 특징에 관한 소고" 15 (15): 2005.12

6 김병준, "중국의 섭외 중재계약법과 분쟁해결에 관한 연구" 고려대학교대학원 박사학위 논문 1994

7 "외국중재법규집" 대한상사중재원 2005

8 "상사분쟁해결추진을 위한 한,중 중재기관간 협력방안" 2005.5

9 "무역분쟁해결을 위한 한, 중 조정제도 비교연구" 한국중재학회 14 (14): 2004.8

10 "대한상사중재원 중재규칙, 2000.4.27 대법원 승인" 2000

11 신군제, "남북한 및 중국중제제도 비교연구" 한국중재학회 17 (17): 2007.8

12 "국제상사중재론" 두남 2004.3

13 "http：//www.globalarbitrationreview.com/handbook/3/section/6/cha 2007.7.29" 2007

14 "The Maritime Arbitration Commission At the Chamber and Industry of the Russia Federation"

15 "The International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber and Industry of the Russia Federation"

16 "The Fedrak Law on Arbitration Courts"

17 "Law of the Russia Federation on Int'l commercial Arbitration"

18 "Japan Maritime Arbitration Rule of Japan shipping Exchange Inc"

19 "Japan International Commercial Arbitration Rule of Japan International Arbitration Association"

20 "Japan Construction Arbitration Rule of the Central and Perfectual Tribunal For The Settlement of Construction Work dispute"

21 "Arbitration Rule of the Russia Maritime Arbitration Commission"

22 "Arbitration Rule of CMAC"

23 "Arbitration Rule of CIETAC"