동북아 해양 귀속권 분쟁 보도와 지역안보: 한·중·일 신문의 독도, 이어도, 조어도에 대한 보도를 중심으로 = A reporting about Northeast Asia maritime disputes and regional security: Mainly based on the report of Korean, Chinese and Japanese medias about Dokdo, Ieodo, Senkaku(Diaoyudao)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, there have emerged a series of maritime disputes including Dokdo, Ieodo and Senkaku(Diaoyudao) among South Korea, China, and Japan. As these three countries are major members of the Northeast Asian region, their disputes are challenging the regional stability without progress toward solution. Based on theoretical basis that the media reports can affect regional security, this article analyzes a reporting attitude of Korean, Chinese and Japanese medias about Dokdo, Ieodo and Senkaku(Diaoyudao) disputes from a view of International Politics. The main observation is that media of the three countries provided incorrect and biased facts regarding maritime disputes, although correct and unbiased information serves as a basis for people to address these issues in reasonable and diplomatic ways. When suggesting necessary responses as well, the media of three countries generally preferred a hard-line policy emphasizing inflexibility and resoluteness, which can negatively affect the regional security. Also, they showed stand-by or instigating the situation where the disputing countries reduced and almost severed dialogue and cultural exchanges in response to the maritime disputes. Despite variation in degrees among periods, this tendency was repeated and intensified when the maritime dispute issues were emerged. To make a more secure Northeast Asia, maritime disputes should be resolved through peaceful and reasonable ways. For this purpose, the media of three countries need to improve reporting attitudes about maritime disputes.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 白忠鉉, "領土紛爭의 解決方式과 證據" 17-37, 1982

2 강효백, "한중해양 경계획정 문제: 이어도를 중심으로" 한국동북아학회 14 (14): 85-107, 2009

3 이석우, "한국의 영토분쟁의 해결에 있어 역사비평적 접근의 시도" 서울국제법연구원 17 (17): 47-63, 2010

4 오미영, "커뮤니케이션 핵심이론" 커뮤니케이션북스 2005

5 김영구, "이어도 문제와 한중관계" (7) : 37-73, 2009

6 최태현, "외교적 방식에 의한 영토분쟁의 해결" 법학연구소 24 (24): 71-96, 2007

7 Bryant & Oliver, "언론 효과이론" 나남 2010

8 박인휘, "안보와 지역: 안보개념의 정립과 동북아안보공동체의 가능성" 세종연구소 16 (16): 33-62, 2010

9 김현수, "센카쿠(조어도)분쟁의 국제법적 고찰" 156-185, 1997

10 박성욱, "독도영유권을 둘러싼 한일 양국의 핵심쟁점 검토" 한국해사법학회 22 (22): 221-246, 2010

11 신용하, "독도. 세계인이 '독도문제'를 이해하기 위한 16포인트"

12 손석춘, "독도 저널리즘’의 실패" 58-61, 2005

13 최영재, "독도 : 국익과 진실보도 : 사실과 진실을 포기하고 국민 정서에 영합" 54-58, 2005

14 배진수, "기사도 국제법적 증거 인정 신중한 보도 자세 절실 : 독도보도와 국익" 54-57, 2008

15 박현모, "국제정치학" 인간사랑 2000

16 박춘호, "국제법 측면에서 본 독도 쟁점과 언론 보도 : 정부가 미워서? 황당무계한 ‘독도’ 논란" 52-55, 2006

17 김부찬, "韓中 漁業協定과 ‘이어도’ 주변수역의 법적 문제" 10 : 235-251, 2000

18 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室, "钓鱼岛是中国的固有领土(白皮书)" 2012

19 島根県, "調査研究成果․報告"

20 日本外務省, "竹島問題"

21 和田春樹., "東北アジア共同の家－新地域主義宣言" 平凡社 2003

22 日本外務省, "尖閣諸島の領有権についての基本見解"

23 网易, "外交部回应苏岩礁问题 称中韩无领土纷争"

24 刘力 主编, "国际政治双语教程" 旅游教育出版社 2009

25 朱锋, "国际关系理论与东亚安全" 中国人民大学出版社 2007

26 邢悦, "国际关系:理论历史与现实" 复旦大学出版社 2008

27 日本ABC協会, "全国紙の朝・夕刊別販売部数, 新聞発行社レポート 半期"

28 王德水, "从国际法视角看中日钓鱼岛主权争端" 3 : 65-69, 2007

29 猎讯军情网., "中国宣布在苏岩礁巡航, 急的韩国媒体上蹿下跳"

30 황성빈, "‘이성적 일본’과 ‘감정적 한국’ 대립 스토리로 구성 : 일본 언론의 독도 보도를 읽는다" 58-61, 2008

31 Blood, R. W., "Unobtrusive issues in the agenda-setting role of the press" Syracuse University 1981

32 Maxwell E. McCombs, "The agenda-setting function of mass media" 36 : 176-187, 1972

33 Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, "The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion" 24 (24): 43-51, 1974

34 David Baldwin, "The Concept of Security" 23 : 5-26, 1997

35 Jean Allain., "Orientalism and International Law : The Middle East as the Underclass of the International Legal Order" 17 : 391-404, 2004

36 J. Herz, "International Politics in the Atomic Age" Columbia University Press 157-,

37 Council on Foreign Relations, "Harold Brown on International Security"