RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    쵸서의 英語에 나타난 强變化1類動詞의 硏究 = A Study on the Strong Verbs of Class Ⅰ in Chaucer's English

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2096041

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this article is to prove the hypothesis that the strong verbs of class Ⅰ in Chaucer's English did not change to weak verbs as in the other works of the same period. The results of investigation obtained through my research and analysis of the 34 strong verbs of class Ⅰ in The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer edited by F. N. Robinson are as follow.
    In Chaucer's English there were 34 strong verbs of the class Ⅰ of which 20 verbs had strong forms, 2 verbs having weak form besides strong form, and 5 verbs chide, hyde, slitte, syke, swyve had only weak forms. They were originally weak verbs in OE but became strong verbs since Chaucer's time. The 5 verbs agryse, byte, dryve, stryve, wrye among 20 verbs began to have weak forms besides strong forms before or in Chaucer's time, but the 5 verbs had only strong forms in Chaucer's English so that the strong verbs of class Ⅰ in Chaucer's English kept relatively the good ablaut series in Chaucer's English. My research indicates that there were 52 past participle forms in Chaucer's English and of them 34 forms (35%) had prefix (i- or y-). This shows that Wright's suggestion (1928 : 177) that the prefix ??e-, later i-or y- of the past participle was rarely inflected in early ME is wrong.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this article is to prove the hypothesis that the strong verbs of class Ⅰ in Chaucer's English did not change to weak verbs as in the other works of the same period. The results of investigation obtained through my research and analysi...

    The purpose of this article is to prove the hypothesis that the strong verbs of class Ⅰ in Chaucer's English did not change to weak verbs as in the other works of the same period. The results of investigation obtained through my research and analysis of the 34 strong verbs of class Ⅰ in The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer edited by F. N. Robinson are as follow.
    In Chaucer's English there were 34 strong verbs of the class Ⅰ of which 20 verbs had strong forms, 2 verbs having weak form besides strong form, and 5 verbs chide, hyde, slitte, syke, swyve had only weak forms. They were originally weak verbs in OE but became strong verbs since Chaucer's time. The 5 verbs agryse, byte, dryve, stryve, wrye among 20 verbs began to have weak forms besides strong forms before or in Chaucer's time, but the 5 verbs had only strong forms in Chaucer's English so that the strong verbs of class Ⅰ in Chaucer's English kept relatively the good ablaut series in Chaucer's English. My research indicates that there were 52 past participle forms in Chaucer's English and of them 34 forms (35%) had prefix (i- or y-). This shows that Wright's suggestion (1928 : 177) that the prefix ??e-, later i-or y- of the past participle was rarely inflected in early ME is wrong.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼