RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    유사매매사례가액을 적용한 상속 증여재산 평가의 문제점과 개선방안 = A Study on the Issues and Proposed Improvements for the Valuation of Inherited and Gift Properties Using Comparable Sales Prices

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110326741

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    While the statutory period for determining the market value of inherited or gifted property has been extended to two years prior to the commencement of inheritance or the date of the gift, the heightened volatility of apartment prices in the Seoul metropolitan area has increased disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities regarding valuations based on comparable sales prices. This study analyzes Tax Tribunal precedents concerning special circumstances of price fluctuation and suggests measures for more rational adjudication.
    An analysis of 66 Tax Tribunal cases between 2020 and June 2025 revealed that most appeals involved properties in the Seoul metropolitan area, where the apartment market experienced significant volatility, with inheritance or gift dates concentrated between 2020 and 2022. The overall acceptance rate for these cases was 21.2%, lower than the general average for inheritance and gift tax appeals. However, this rate rose to 28.6%~30.0% from 2024. Furthermore, the acceptance rate increased with longer gaps between the valuation date and the sales contract date, reaching 45% for intervals of 18 months or more. Additional analysis of price indices indicated higher acceptance rates in cases where the price index had declined.
    To improve adjudicative fairness, this study proposes several measures. First, systematic data on various price indices and market trends must be provided. Since the burden of proof regarding the absence of special circumstances of price fluctuation lies with the tax authorities, their responsibility should be reinforced and formalized through the structured evidence reports. Additionally, the deliberation process of the National Tax Service’s Valuation Review Committee should be operated more substantively, with detailed results presented during the adjudication process. Finally, the study emphasizes the need to establish quantitative criteria for identifying special circumstances of price fluctuation.
    번역하기

    While the statutory period for determining the market value of inherited or gifted property has been extended to two years prior to the commencement of inheritance or the date of the gift, the heightened volatility of apartment prices in the Seoul met...

    While the statutory period for determining the market value of inherited or gifted property has been extended to two years prior to the commencement of inheritance or the date of the gift, the heightened volatility of apartment prices in the Seoul metropolitan area has increased disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities regarding valuations based on comparable sales prices. This study analyzes Tax Tribunal precedents concerning special circumstances of price fluctuation and suggests measures for more rational adjudication.
    An analysis of 66 Tax Tribunal cases between 2020 and June 2025 revealed that most appeals involved properties in the Seoul metropolitan area, where the apartment market experienced significant volatility, with inheritance or gift dates concentrated between 2020 and 2022. The overall acceptance rate for these cases was 21.2%, lower than the general average for inheritance and gift tax appeals. However, this rate rose to 28.6%~30.0% from 2024. Furthermore, the acceptance rate increased with longer gaps between the valuation date and the sales contract date, reaching 45% for intervals of 18 months or more. Additional analysis of price indices indicated higher acceptance rates in cases where the price index had declined.
    To improve adjudicative fairness, this study proposes several measures. First, systematic data on various price indices and market trends must be provided. Since the burden of proof regarding the absence of special circumstances of price fluctuation lies with the tax authorities, their responsibility should be reinforced and formalized through the structured evidence reports. Additionally, the deliberation process of the National Tax Service’s Valuation Review Committee should be operated more substantively, with detailed results presented during the adjudication process. Finally, the study emphasizes the need to establish quantitative criteria for identifying special circumstances of price fluctuation.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼