RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Association of extubation failure rate with patient outcomes

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110326183

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background: While the propensity of evidence indicates the potential harm of failed extubation attempts, avoidance of any such risk may unnecessarily expose patients to prolonged invasive ventilation. We aimed to study the effects of extubation failure rate (EFR) on patient mortality and ventilation-free days (VFD).Methods: Adult patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit who underwent planned extubation were included. Extubation failure was defined as death or return to invasive positive pressure ventilation within 7 days from extubation. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and the secondary outcome was VFD. For each calendar month, the average 30-day mortality or VFD was plotted against the EFR, with polynomial regression models of increasing complexity fitted until no further increase in the adjusted R<sup>2</sup> could be achieved.Results: Of the 774 patients included in final analysis, 262 (33.8%) failed extubation. Matched by the propensity for extubation failure, the 30-day mortality analysis for both groups showed no significant difference (18.4% vs. 16.2%, P=0.34). The relationship between monthly EFR and 30-day survival or VFD was best described by a quadratic regression model (adjusted R<sup>2</sup>=0.816 and 0.624, respectively). Based on this model, the optimal EFR was calculated at 33.1% (for 30-day survival) and 28.8% (for VFD).Conclusions: Our data support the notion of an optimal EFR. This optimum may be higher than the minimal failure rate achievable.
    번역하기

    Background: While the propensity of evidence indicates the potential harm of failed extubation attempts, avoidance of any such risk may unnecessarily expose patients to prolonged invasive ventilation. We aimed to study the effects of extubation failur...

    Background: While the propensity of evidence indicates the potential harm of failed extubation attempts, avoidance of any such risk may unnecessarily expose patients to prolonged invasive ventilation. We aimed to study the effects of extubation failure rate (EFR) on patient mortality and ventilation-free days (VFD).Methods: Adult patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit who underwent planned extubation were included. Extubation failure was defined as death or return to invasive positive pressure ventilation within 7 days from extubation. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and the secondary outcome was VFD. For each calendar month, the average 30-day mortality or VFD was plotted against the EFR, with polynomial regression models of increasing complexity fitted until no further increase in the adjusted R<sup>2</sup> could be achieved.Results: Of the 774 patients included in final analysis, 262 (33.8%) failed extubation. Matched by the propensity for extubation failure, the 30-day mortality analysis for both groups showed no significant difference (18.4% vs. 16.2%, P=0.34). The relationship between monthly EFR and 30-day survival or VFD was best described by a quadratic regression model (adjusted R<sup>2</sup>=0.816 and 0.624, respectively). Based on this model, the optimal EFR was calculated at 33.1% (for 30-day survival) and 28.8% (for VFD).Conclusions: Our data support the notion of an optimal EFR. This optimum may be higher than the minimal failure rate achievable.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼