RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Effects of Field and Strength Training Load on Injury Risk in Japanese Collegiate American Football Players

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110286015

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    OBJECTIVES In this study, we aimed to assess relationships between field and strength training loads and injury occurrence in Japanese Division II collegiate American football players, focusing on both same-day and previous-day effects of strength training load. It was hypothesized that higher strength training load, particularly when combined with high field training load, would increase injury risk.


    METHODS Twenty male Japanese collegiate American football players were observed over a 21-week training period. Daily training loads were recorded using the session rating of perceived exertion (session-RPE) for both field and strength sessions; strength training volume load was also calculated. Injuries were documented by certified athletic trainers and expressed per 1,000 athlete-exposures (AEs). Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between training load categories (rest, middle, high) and injury risk, considering sameday and previous-day effects and interaction terms between field and strength training loads.


    RESULTS A total of 26 injuries (10.4 per 1,000 AEs) were recorded. High session-RPE (≥ 875 AU) for field training was significantly associated with increased injury risk in both same-day and previous-day models: odds ratio (OR) = 7.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.99-31.39, p = 0.003) and OR = 7.78 (95% CI: 1.95-31.08, p = 0.004), respectively. However, neither session-RPE for strength training nor total volume load for strength training was associated with injury risk in any model.


    CONCLUSIONS Field training load appears to be the primary factor associated with non-contact injury risk in Japanese collegiate American football players, highlighting the importance of careful monitoring and management of field training demands. In contrast, supervised strength training showed no harmful association with injury risk and may support injury prevention when appropriately integrated within a structured training program.
    번역하기

    OBJECTIVES In this study, we aimed to assess relationships between field and strength training loads and injury occurrence in Japanese Division II collegiate American football players, focusing on both same-day and previous-day effects of strength tra...

    OBJECTIVES In this study, we aimed to assess relationships between field and strength training loads and injury occurrence in Japanese Division II collegiate American football players, focusing on both same-day and previous-day effects of strength training load. It was hypothesized that higher strength training load, particularly when combined with high field training load, would increase injury risk.


    METHODS Twenty male Japanese collegiate American football players were observed over a 21-week training period. Daily training loads were recorded using the session rating of perceived exertion (session-RPE) for both field and strength sessions; strength training volume load was also calculated. Injuries were documented by certified athletic trainers and expressed per 1,000 athlete-exposures (AEs). Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between training load categories (rest, middle, high) and injury risk, considering sameday and previous-day effects and interaction terms between field and strength training loads.


    RESULTS A total of 26 injuries (10.4 per 1,000 AEs) were recorded. High session-RPE (≥ 875 AU) for field training was significantly associated with increased injury risk in both same-day and previous-day models: odds ratio (OR) = 7.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.99-31.39, p = 0.003) and OR = 7.78 (95% CI: 1.95-31.08, p = 0.004), respectively. However, neither session-RPE for strength training nor total volume load for strength training was associated with injury risk in any model.


    CONCLUSIONS Field training load appears to be the primary factor associated with non-contact injury risk in Japanese collegiate American football players, highlighting the importance of careful monitoring and management of field training demands. In contrast, supervised strength training showed no harmful association with injury risk and may support injury prevention when appropriately integrated within a structured training program.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼