RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    초등교사의 업무 시간 배분 유형에 따른 교사 효능감, 사기, 직무 만족도 비교 = Comparing Teacher Self-Efficacy, Morale, and Job Satisfaction Across Work Time Allocation Profiles of Elementary School Teachers

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110245051

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study empirically examined how elementary school teachers’ work time is allocated across key task domains and how distinct time-allocation patterns are associated with teacher self-efficacy, morale, and job satisfaction. Using survey data from 4,048 elementary teachers in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea, we conducted latent profile analysis based on teachers’ self-reported percentages of time devoted to seven task categories: regular instruction and related activities, after-school and remedial instruction, student counseling and guidance, professional learning community and training, grade-level collaboration and coordination, administrative and school operation tasks, and other tasks. Although model-fit indices favored a five-profile solution, a consistently emerging very small class (approximately 0.7%) reported an unusually high proportion of “other” tasks and was deemed implausible; these cases were excluded, yielding four interpretable profiles: instruction-focused (44.2%), guidance-focused (33.5%), administration-focused (12.6%), and grade-collaboration-focused (9.0%). One-way ANOVA indicated no significant differences across profiles in instructional self-efficacy, and differences in guidance self-efficacy were statistically significant but negligible in magnitude. In contrast, teacher morale and job satisfaction (both satisfaction with the teaching profession and satisfaction with the school) differed significantly across profiles: the instruction-focused group reported the highest levels, whereas the administration-focused group reported the lowest levels consistently. These findings suggest that diagnosing teachers’ work challenges requires attention not only to workload volume but also to the structural composition of time allocation. Policy implications include profile-tailored strategies that combine redesigning administrative task ownership and procedures, strengthening counseling and student-support systems, institutionally protecting instructional time, and refining the organization and functioning of collaborative work.
    번역하기

    This study empirically examined how elementary school teachers’ work time is allocated across key task domains and how distinct time-allocation patterns are associated with teacher self-efficacy, morale, and job satisfaction. Using survey data from ...

    This study empirically examined how elementary school teachers’ work time is allocated across key task domains and how distinct time-allocation patterns are associated with teacher self-efficacy, morale, and job satisfaction. Using survey data from 4,048 elementary teachers in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea, we conducted latent profile analysis based on teachers’ self-reported percentages of time devoted to seven task categories: regular instruction and related activities, after-school and remedial instruction, student counseling and guidance, professional learning community and training, grade-level collaboration and coordination, administrative and school operation tasks, and other tasks. Although model-fit indices favored a five-profile solution, a consistently emerging very small class (approximately 0.7%) reported an unusually high proportion of “other” tasks and was deemed implausible; these cases were excluded, yielding four interpretable profiles: instruction-focused (44.2%), guidance-focused (33.5%), administration-focused (12.6%), and grade-collaboration-focused (9.0%). One-way ANOVA indicated no significant differences across profiles in instructional self-efficacy, and differences in guidance self-efficacy were statistically significant but negligible in magnitude. In contrast, teacher morale and job satisfaction (both satisfaction with the teaching profession and satisfaction with the school) differed significantly across profiles: the instruction-focused group reported the highest levels, whereas the administration-focused group reported the lowest levels consistently. These findings suggest that diagnosing teachers’ work challenges requires attention not only to workload volume but also to the structural composition of time allocation. Policy implications include profile-tailored strategies that combine redesigning administrative task ownership and procedures, strengthening counseling and student-support systems, institutionally protecting instructional time, and refining the organization and functioning of collaborative work.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼