RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    환동해권에서 발해유적 세계유산 등재 전망과 의미 = Prospects and Meaning of World Heritage Listing of Balhae Historic Sites in the East Sea Region

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110219802

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the significance of Balhae culture in the East Sea region centered on the East Sea, such as the East Sea region of the Korean Peninsula, the Japanese archipelago, the Amur and Usuri rivers, and the Primorsky Krai regions, not the center of China’s central region. The order of development of this article was to first investigate the value of the Pan-East Sea region, which encompasses the Russian Primorsky Krai and the lower Amur River, and the east and southeast coasts of the two Koreas, and the status of Balhae country, which built the best advanced culture in the Pan-East Sea region from the 7th century to the early 10th century. Second, the Chinese government is currently making a lot of investment and effort to register Balhae ruins as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Then, I summarized what candidates for registration among Balhae relics were. Third, I investigated what approach would be possible if it was registered and what the meaning of registration was. At the end of the final conclusion, the purpose of the study was achieved by proposing the role of Korea from the standpoint of Balhae, the subject of the Pan-East Sea region, not the center of China.
    China’s efforts to protect its Balhae relics should be respected at a time when many of them are being damaged. However, we should be wary of the attitude of utilizing cultural heritage for political purposes. Efforts will be needed to recognize and protect the many countries and peoples that were in the past in the East Sea region, where the border was fluid, as a common history in East Asia, away from the monopoly of history to interpret it only as China’s history. It should be faced that not only China, but all countries related to the East Sea region, including South Korea, North Korea, and Russia, have a role together.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the significance of Balhae culture in the East Sea region centered on the East Sea, such as the East Sea region of the Korean Peninsula, the Japanese archipelago, the Amur and Usuri rivers, and the Primorsk...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the significance of Balhae culture in the East Sea region centered on the East Sea, such as the East Sea region of the Korean Peninsula, the Japanese archipelago, the Amur and Usuri rivers, and the Primorsky Krai regions, not the center of China’s central region. The order of development of this article was to first investigate the value of the Pan-East Sea region, which encompasses the Russian Primorsky Krai and the lower Amur River, and the east and southeast coasts of the two Koreas, and the status of Balhae country, which built the best advanced culture in the Pan-East Sea region from the 7th century to the early 10th century. Second, the Chinese government is currently making a lot of investment and effort to register Balhae ruins as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Then, I summarized what candidates for registration among Balhae relics were. Third, I investigated what approach would be possible if it was registered and what the meaning of registration was. At the end of the final conclusion, the purpose of the study was achieved by proposing the role of Korea from the standpoint of Balhae, the subject of the Pan-East Sea region, not the center of China.
    China’s efforts to protect its Balhae relics should be respected at a time when many of them are being damaged. However, we should be wary of the attitude of utilizing cultural heritage for political purposes. Efforts will be needed to recognize and protect the many countries and peoples that were in the past in the East Sea region, where the border was fluid, as a common history in East Asia, away from the monopoly of history to interpret it only as China’s history. It should be faced that not only China, but all countries related to the East Sea region, including South Korea, North Korea, and Russia, have a role together.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼