RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국제중재에서 이해충돌에 관한 2024년 개정 IBA 지침에 관한 연구 = A Study on the 2024 IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the 2024 IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration by comparing them with the 2014 Guidelines. Building on the 2014 framework of General Standards and the color lists, the 2024 revision responds to developments in arbitral practice by refining the management of conflicts of interest.
    The analysis focuses on the key structural updates reflected in General Standards 1–7 and the revised Red/Orange/Green Lists, including expanded treatment of party-equivalent entities, disclosure and waiver timelines, and the allocation of responsibilities among arbitrators, parties, and arbitral institutions. It also considers how the revised IBA framework aligns with, and may inform, institutional practice under major arbitration regimes (including ICC, LCIA, SIAC, and ICSID), and how far it functions as a de facto interpretive standard despite its formally non-binding character.
    Based on these comparisons, the study highlights the practical significance of the 2024 Guidelines as a conflict-of-interest benchmark and outlines implications for domestic rulemaking and conflict management in Korea, and the treatment of arbitral secretaries under the Korean Arbitration Act and KCAB International Rules. The findings aim to provide a structured reference point for legislators, institutions, and practitioners seeking to align Korean arbitration practice with evolving global standards on arbitrator independence and impartiality.
    번역하기

    This study examines the 2024 IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration by comparing them with the 2014 Guidelines. Building on the 2014 framework of General Standards and the color lists, the 2024 revision responds to develo...

    This study examines the 2024 IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration by comparing them with the 2014 Guidelines. Building on the 2014 framework of General Standards and the color lists, the 2024 revision responds to developments in arbitral practice by refining the management of conflicts of interest.
    The analysis focuses on the key structural updates reflected in General Standards 1–7 and the revised Red/Orange/Green Lists, including expanded treatment of party-equivalent entities, disclosure and waiver timelines, and the allocation of responsibilities among arbitrators, parties, and arbitral institutions. It also considers how the revised IBA framework aligns with, and may inform, institutional practice under major arbitration regimes (including ICC, LCIA, SIAC, and ICSID), and how far it functions as a de facto interpretive standard despite its formally non-binding character.
    Based on these comparisons, the study highlights the practical significance of the 2024 Guidelines as a conflict-of-interest benchmark and outlines implications for domestic rulemaking and conflict management in Korea, and the treatment of arbitral secretaries under the Korean Arbitration Act and KCAB International Rules. The findings aim to provide a structured reference point for legislators, institutions, and practitioners seeking to align Korean arbitration practice with evolving global standards on arbitrator independence and impartiality.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼