RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소셜벤처의 비즈니스모델 유형에 따른 사회성과의 효율성, 구성, 측정 방법론 분석 = Analyzing Social Impact Efficiency, Composition, and Valuation Methodologies across Business Model Types in Social Ventures

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110193042

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study empirically examines the relationships among business model (BM) types, social impact efficiency, impact composition, and valuation methodologies within social ventures. Drawing on monetized performance data from 122 Korean social ventures, we explore the alignment patterns between hybrid organizational modes and social value creation. The findings reveal that BM types do not yield statistically significant differences in overall impact efficiency, suggesting that the scale of impact is driven more by the integrative density between social mission and business operations than by the outward BM form. In contrast, the composition of social impact varies systematically across BM types, as social ventures tend to concentrate on specific impact domains aligned with their underlying operational mechanisms. Furthermore, the selection of impact valuation methodologies differs by BM type, reflecting variations in how social performance is conceptualized and measured.
    Collectively, these results indicate that business models are not mere determinants of impact scale per se; they serve as structural frameworks that shape how social impact is structured, interpreted, and validated. By shifting the focus from simple efficiency metrics to the patterned interplay among BMs, impact composition, and valuation methodologies, this study provides a robust empirical foundation for a contingency-based perspective on social venture performance.
    번역하기

    This study empirically examines the relationships among business model (BM) types, social impact efficiency, impact composition, and valuation methodologies within social ventures. Drawing on monetized performance data from 122 Korean social ventures,...

    This study empirically examines the relationships among business model (BM) types, social impact efficiency, impact composition, and valuation methodologies within social ventures. Drawing on monetized performance data from 122 Korean social ventures, we explore the alignment patterns between hybrid organizational modes and social value creation. The findings reveal that BM types do not yield statistically significant differences in overall impact efficiency, suggesting that the scale of impact is driven more by the integrative density between social mission and business operations than by the outward BM form. In contrast, the composition of social impact varies systematically across BM types, as social ventures tend to concentrate on specific impact domains aligned with their underlying operational mechanisms. Furthermore, the selection of impact valuation methodologies differs by BM type, reflecting variations in how social performance is conceptualized and measured.
    Collectively, these results indicate that business models are not mere determinants of impact scale per se; they serve as structural frameworks that shape how social impact is structured, interpreted, and validated. By shifting the focus from simple efficiency metrics to the patterned interplay among BMs, impact composition, and valuation methodologies, this study provides a robust empirical foundation for a contingency-based perspective on social venture performance.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼