This study examines and typologizes university integration and alliance models in South Korea. Employing a mixed-methods design, it combines a systematic literature review of domestic and international scholarship with in-depth case analyses of major ...
This study examines and typologizes university integration and alliance models in South Korea. Employing a mixed-methods design, it combines a systematic literature review of domestic and international scholarship with in-depth case analyses of major Korean initiatives. The study proposes a two-stage hierarchical analytical framework centered on the degree of governance integration. Stage 1 distinguishes university integration from university alliance according to whether governance is unified. Stage 2 further classifies integration into merger, acquisition, unification, and consolidation, and alliances into collaboration, consortium, alliance, and federation.
The case analyses reveal distinctive patterns and outcomes across types: a government-led, regional-innovation merger model (Chonnam National University–Yeosu National University); a complementary-capabilities acquisition model (The Catholic University of Korea–Sacred Heart Women’s University); an innovative intra-corporation unification model (Wonkwang University–Wonkwang Health Science University); and a new-identity consolidation model (Gyeongsang National University). For alliances, models emerging in connection with the Glocal University policy include the Dong-A University–Dongseo University and the Handalbich Glocal Health Alliance University. However, legal and institutional constraints currently limit the realization of a fully fledged federation model in the Korean context. Building on these findings, the study discusses future directions for university integration and alliances in the Korean context.