RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대규모 언어모델을 활용한 질적 데이터의 양적 지표화 : 물리치료 융합을 위한 새로운 방법론 = (Quantification of Qualitative Data Using Large Language Models: A Novel Methodology for Physical Therapy Integration)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110180257

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Qualitative analysis constitutes an essential methodological approach in physical therapy research, offering comprehensive insights into patients' subjective experiences, perceptions of therapeutic interventions, and recovery trajectories, thereby facilitating evidence-based intervention development and optimizing clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, conventional qualitative analytical approaches applied to physical therapy patient interviews encounter substantial limitations regarding analytical efficiency and inter-rater reliability. The present study examines the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into qualitative research methodologies within the physical therapy domain to address these methodological constraints. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with one stroke patient as a pilot case, and three LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini) were employed with 160 iterative measurements each to implement the Large Language Model Quotient (LLMq) methodology—a quantitative framework for systematic qualitative coding—to evaluate its validity and applicability within the physical therapy research context. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis demonstrated ICC(3,1) of 0.802 and ICC(3,k) of 0.924, meeting Cicchetti's (1994) criteria for excellent reliability. Findings demonstrate that this analytical approach significantly enhances the efficiency of qualitative data analysis (reducing analysis time from weeks-months to hours-days) while mitigating subjective interpretive bias (ICC 0.802), thereby substantiating the considerable methodological value that LLM-based approaches confer upon physical therapy research endeavors.
    번역하기

    Qualitative analysis constitutes an essential methodological approach in physical therapy research, offering comprehensive insights into patients' subjective experiences, perceptions of therapeutic interventions, and recovery trajectories, thereby fac...

    Qualitative analysis constitutes an essential methodological approach in physical therapy research, offering comprehensive insights into patients' subjective experiences, perceptions of therapeutic interventions, and recovery trajectories, thereby facilitating evidence-based intervention development and optimizing clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, conventional qualitative analytical approaches applied to physical therapy patient interviews encounter substantial limitations regarding analytical efficiency and inter-rater reliability. The present study examines the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into qualitative research methodologies within the physical therapy domain to address these methodological constraints. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with one stroke patient as a pilot case, and three LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini) were employed with 160 iterative measurements each to implement the Large Language Model Quotient (LLMq) methodology—a quantitative framework for systematic qualitative coding—to evaluate its validity and applicability within the physical therapy research context. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis demonstrated ICC(3,1) of 0.802 and ICC(3,k) of 0.924, meeting Cicchetti's (1994) criteria for excellent reliability. Findings demonstrate that this analytical approach significantly enhances the efficiency of qualitative data analysis (reducing analysis time from weeks-months to hours-days) while mitigating subjective interpretive bias (ICC 0.802), thereby substantiating the considerable methodological value that LLM-based approaches confer upon physical therapy research endeavors.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼