RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    汉语新词构词特征及其语义呈现方式研究 = A Study of the Word-Formation Characteristics of Chinese Neologisms and Their Semantic Presentation Patterns

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110179530

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigates 116 Chinese neologisms (57 nouns, 48 verbs, and 11 adjectives) whose first recorded appearances date from 2016 to 2020, drawing on Hanyu Xinciyu as the primary corpus. These items are systematically examined from two complementary perspectives: word-formation patterns and modes of semantic realization.
    From a morphological perspective, neologisms from this period are predominantly formed through established structural relations, including coordination, modification, subject–predicate, verb–object, verb–complement constructions, and derivation. By contrast, non-structural strategies such as abbreviation, blending, and playful coinage function mainly as external formation strategies rather than internal word-formation mechanisms. This distribution indicates that the creation of contemporary Chinese neologisms remains strongly grounded in existing grammatical resources, with innovation largely achieved through the reorganization and compression of conventional structures rather than through radical departures from the grammatical system.
    From a semantic perspective, the meanings of these neologisms are realized through four major types of semantic presentation: (1) contextual reinterpretation of existing lexical meanings, (2) semantic specialization in network-mediated discourse, (3) the vernacularization of technical and professional terminology, and (4) identity marking through quasi-affixal formations. Rather than reflecting autonomous semantic mechanisms, these types capture recurrent ways in which lexical meanings are actualized under specific contextual and morphological conditions. In these processes, meanings are projected across categories, reconfigured within social contexts, and stabilized through context-dependent reinterpretation.
    Overall, the semantic development of Chinese neologisms between 2016 and 2020 cannot be reduced to simple semantic extension. Instead, it proceeds through a chained process of inter-category projection, functional reconfiguration, and contextualized reinterpretation. This pattern highlights how lexical innovation in contemporary Chinese emerges from the dynamic interaction between linguistic structure, digital media environments, and evolving social experience.
    번역하기

    This study investigates 116 Chinese neologisms (57 nouns, 48 verbs, and 11 adjectives) whose first recorded appearances date from 2016 to 2020, drawing on Hanyu Xinciyu as the primary corpus. These items are systematically examined from two complement...

    This study investigates 116 Chinese neologisms (57 nouns, 48 verbs, and 11 adjectives) whose first recorded appearances date from 2016 to 2020, drawing on Hanyu Xinciyu as the primary corpus. These items are systematically examined from two complementary perspectives: word-formation patterns and modes of semantic realization.
    From a morphological perspective, neologisms from this period are predominantly formed through established structural relations, including coordination, modification, subject–predicate, verb–object, verb–complement constructions, and derivation. By contrast, non-structural strategies such as abbreviation, blending, and playful coinage function mainly as external formation strategies rather than internal word-formation mechanisms. This distribution indicates that the creation of contemporary Chinese neologisms remains strongly grounded in existing grammatical resources, with innovation largely achieved through the reorganization and compression of conventional structures rather than through radical departures from the grammatical system.
    From a semantic perspective, the meanings of these neologisms are realized through four major types of semantic presentation: (1) contextual reinterpretation of existing lexical meanings, (2) semantic specialization in network-mediated discourse, (3) the vernacularization of technical and professional terminology, and (4) identity marking through quasi-affixal formations. Rather than reflecting autonomous semantic mechanisms, these types capture recurrent ways in which lexical meanings are actualized under specific contextual and morphological conditions. In these processes, meanings are projected across categories, reconfigured within social contexts, and stabilized through context-dependent reinterpretation.
    Overall, the semantic development of Chinese neologisms between 2016 and 2020 cannot be reduced to simple semantic extension. Instead, it proceeds through a chained process of inter-category projection, functional reconfiguration, and contextualized reinterpretation. This pattern highlights how lexical innovation in contemporary Chinese emerges from the dynamic interaction between linguistic structure, digital media environments, and evolving social experience.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼