RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    1950년대 신중국 작가 양성 제도의 변용과 문학장의 정치 -중앙문학연구소에서 작가협회문학강습소까지- = The Transformation of Writer Training Institutions and the Politics of the Literary Field in 1950s PRC China : From the Central Institute of Literature to the Writers’ Association Literature Training School

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110179306

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article analyzes the institutional mechanisms through which the state sought to systematically cultivate socialist writers in early PRC China during the 1950s, focusing on the Central Institute of Literature (1950–1953) and the Literature Training School under the Chinese Writers’ Association (1953–1957). Following the founding of the PRC, the Chinese Communist Party redefined writers not as autonomous creative subjects but as agents of political and cultural practice, and the Central Institute of Literature emerged as the most concentrated embodiment of this state project. By tracing the Institute’s establishment, debates over its name and institutional status, its transformation into a training school, and shifts in educational objectives and operational modes, this study demonstrates that the system for cultivating socialist writers was not the result of linear policy implementation. Rather, it was continuously adjusted and reconfigured through power relations and conflicts within the literary field. In particular, the article examines the tensions between a drive toward specialization and formalization modeled on the Gorky Institute of World Literature and a revolutionary praxis grounded in the Yan’an literary tradition, as well as the struggles over authority and leadership among Party cultural officials, established revolutionary writers, and emerging literary cadres. Through this analysis, the article argues that the Central Institute of Literature functioned not merely as an educational institution but as a key site where political power and literary institutions intersected and were restructured in the formative years of the PRC literary field.
    번역하기

    This article analyzes the institutional mechanisms through which the state sought to systematically cultivate socialist writers in early PRC China during the 1950s, focusing on the Central Institute of Literature (1950–1953) and the Literature Train...

    This article analyzes the institutional mechanisms through which the state sought to systematically cultivate socialist writers in early PRC China during the 1950s, focusing on the Central Institute of Literature (1950–1953) and the Literature Training School under the Chinese Writers’ Association (1953–1957). Following the founding of the PRC, the Chinese Communist Party redefined writers not as autonomous creative subjects but as agents of political and cultural practice, and the Central Institute of Literature emerged as the most concentrated embodiment of this state project. By tracing the Institute’s establishment, debates over its name and institutional status, its transformation into a training school, and shifts in educational objectives and operational modes, this study demonstrates that the system for cultivating socialist writers was not the result of linear policy implementation. Rather, it was continuously adjusted and reconfigured through power relations and conflicts within the literary field. In particular, the article examines the tensions between a drive toward specialization and formalization modeled on the Gorky Institute of World Literature and a revolutionary praxis grounded in the Yan’an literary tradition, as well as the struggles over authority and leadership among Party cultural officials, established revolutionary writers, and emerging literary cadres. Through this analysis, the article argues that the Central Institute of Literature functioned not merely as an educational institution but as a key site where political power and literary institutions intersected and were restructured in the formative years of the PRC literary field.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼